Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

fullPage.js VS Apache Traffic Server

Compare fullPage.js VS Apache Traffic Server and see what are their differences

fullPage.js logo fullPage.js

fullPage.js is a rich-featured plugin developed by Alvaro Trigo, which offers you a way to eliminate the full height restrictions from its section and slides.

Apache Traffic Server logo Apache Traffic Server

Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/S 2 and 1.1 compliant caching proxy server.
  • fullPage.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-16
  • Apache Traffic Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29

fullPage.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    fullPage.js is easy to implement and configure, allowing developers to create full-screen scrolling websites with minimal effort and code.
  • Built-in Navigation
    It provides built-in navigation options like dots, arrows, and keyboard navigation, enhancing user experience and accessibility.
  • Cross-browser Compatibility
    It is compatible with all modern browsers, ensuring consistent behavior across different environments.
  • Responsive Design
    fullPage.js supports responsive design, allowing sections to adapt to different screen sizes and orientations.
  • Rich Documentation
    It comes with comprehensive documentation, examples, and community support, making it easier for developers to troubleshoot and learn.

Possible disadvantages of fullPage.js

  • Performance Issues
    For very complex pages or older devices, some users may experience performance issues such as slow loading or laggy scrolling.
  • Limited Customization
    While fullPage.js offers many features, some highly specific customizations might not be easily achievable without additional coding.
  • Heavy for Simple Projects
    For simpler projects, fullPage.js might be too robust, adding unnecessary bulk to the codebase.
  • JavaScript Dependency
    As a JavaScript library, fullPage.js requires JavaScript to be enabled, which might pose issues for users or environments where JavaScript is disabled.
  • SEO Concerns
    Single-page style sites might face SEO challenges, as search engines may find it difficult to index content that dynamically loads.

Apache Traffic Server features and specs

  • High Performance
    Apache Traffic Server is designed for high-speed caching and can handle large volumes of traffic efficiently. Its architecture allows it to serve requests with low latency, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications.
  • Scalability
    It offers robust scalability features, allowing it to manage multiple terabytes of data and scale up to handle many clients simultaneously, which is beneficial for growing businesses and expanding infrastructure.
  • Extensibility
    Traffic Server supports plugins and extensions, enabling developers to customize and extend its functionality to suit specific needs, which adds flexibility for unique requirements.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Apache Traffic Server offers a free solution with a strong community support, allowing users to collaborate and contribute to its development and troubleshoot issues.
  • SSL Termination
    It provides the capability to handle SSL termination, which offloads the burden from backend servers, improving overall security and performance for HTTPS traffic.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Traffic Server

  • Complex Configuration
    The configuration of Apache Traffic Server can be complex, especially for beginners, which might require a steep learning curve and extensive documentation reading or seeking community help.
  • Limited Windows Support
    Traffic Server is primarily developed for Unix-based systems and has limited support for Windows, which can be a limitation for organizations that primarily operate in a Windows environment.
  • Community Support
    While it benefits from open-source community support, it may not have the same level of professional support or comprehensive documentation as some commercial alternatives, potentially leading to slower resolution of issues.
  • Resource Intensive
    When handling large amounts of traffic, Apache Traffic Server can become resource-intensive, which may necessitate higher hardware investments to maintain optimal performance.

fullPage.js videos

Fullpage.js Tutorial - Part 1: Introduction

More videos:

  • Review - Adding fullpage.js into your Webflow project
  • Review - Create a vertical fullscreen slider without FullPage.js

Apache Traffic Server videos

Transparent HTTP proxying with Apache Traffic Server

More videos:

  • Review - Yahoo's Adventure with Apache Traffic Server - Shu Kit Chan, Vijay Prashanth Hosahithlu

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to fullPage.js and Apache Traffic Server)
Proxy
48 48%
52% 52
Proxy Server
38 38%
62% 62
Development
100 100%
0% 0
DevOps Tools
32 32%
68% 68

User comments

Share your experience with using fullPage.js and Apache Traffic Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Traffic Server seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

fullPage.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of fullPage.js yet. Tracking of fullPage.js recommendations started around Jul 2021.

Apache Traffic Server mentions (6)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Traffic Server — A free, fast, and scalable HTTP caching system that improves network efficiency. It supports forward and reverse proxy caching and is configurable to run simultaneously on either or both options. It also provides authentication and basic authorization through plugins. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Wikipedia now has up to 1000X reduction of ATS disk read latency at the p999
    Apache Traffic Server: https://trafficserver.apache.org/ Here’s how they use it along with Varnish: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Caching_overview. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • How does Content delivery/distribution network work?
    The LARGE majority of CDNs use either Apache Traffic Server (https://trafficserver.apache.org/) or Nginx for their cache webserver, so the mechanisms used are pretty easy to find if you look through the docs. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Using Nginx as an Object Storage Gateway
    Apache Traffic Server (no relation to Apache itself) would be an excellent option: https://trafficserver.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Build a CDN in about 5 hours
    We have choices. We could use Varnish (scripting! Edge side includes! PHK blog posts!). We could use Apache Traffic Server (being the only new team this year to use ATS!). Or we could use NGINX (we're already running it!). The only certainty is that you'll come to hate whichever one you pick. Try them all and pick the one you hate the least. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing fullPage.js and Apache Traffic Server, you can also consider the following products

Clusterize.js - Clusterize.js is an all-in-one plugin mostly used by professional developers that dynamically create tables that often need in HTML service.

Squid Proxy - Website Content Acceleration and Distribution. Thousands of web-sites around the Internet use Squid to drastically increase their content delivery. Squid can reduce your server load and improve delivery speeds to clients.

Jmpress.js - Jmpress.js is a tool having the definitive source of one of the best JavaScript libraries, frameworks, and plugins.

3proxy - 3proxy freeware proxy server for Windows and Unix. HTTP, SOCKS, FTP, POP3

Infinite Scroll - New! JavaScript and jQuery plugin to automatically add next pages.

CCProxy - Want to share Internet connection? Get every computer online through a single Internet connection?