Software Alternatives & Reviews

JMP.chat VS Converse.JS

Compare JMP.chat VS Converse.JS and see what are their differences

JMP.chat logo JMP.chat

Social & Communications

Converse.JS logo Converse.JS

A free and open-source chat client for your website
  • JMP.chat Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19
  • Converse.JS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28

JMP.chat videos

Multiple phone numbers across devices with JMP.chat (MMS + Phone)

More videos:

  • Review - Denver Gingrich (JMP.chat) - Software Freedom Business Models

Converse.JS videos

Real-Time Chat on the Web How to use XMPP and Converse.js to integrate webchat into any website

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JMP.chat and Converse.JS)
Communication
82 82%
18% 18
Customer Support
0 0%
100% 100
Group Chat & Notifications
VoIP
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using JMP.chat and Converse.JS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JMP.chat seems to be a lot more popular than Converse.JS. While we know about 142 links to JMP.chat, we've tracked only 9 mentions of Converse.JS. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JMP.chat mentions (142)

  • Signal: Keep your phone number private with Signal usernames
    Why do you need a German phone number? Many countries let anyone have a phone number, with no proof of address or other identifying information. Just use one of those numbers instead. One example service is https://jmp.chat/ but there are many others. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Google Voice goes US only
    Https://jmp.chat/ has been great for me, uses bandwidth behind the scenes and wraps the experience in a nice XMPP UX. Calls and texts work, only issues I've run into are the usual some services don't accept VOIP numbers, and group texts > 10 people I can receive but not send messages (bandwidth provider limitation AFAIK). Bonus is that their stack is all open source and since it's XMPP you can use whatever clients... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Self-Hosted VOIP based around wifi calling
    TLDR - I want to be able to take a bunch of sim cards, and use them to forward phones and SMS's to my actual phone. This would enable me to easily split my phone numbers up to multiple services without relying on third party hosts like jmp.chat or voip.ms. Another key tenant is that I want to avoid doing the calls and SMS's themselves over cellular - instead, wanting to rely on wifi-calling (VoWifi) - The point of... Source: 6 months ago
  • Cophone – Your Virtual Smartphone
    You might try https://jmp.chat. I'm very happy with them, I get SMS for everything I've tried(though I haven't tried everything/much). - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Porting a number to Google Voice to protect a number from porting attacks...
    Lol. Yeah, expect no privacy on the number. SMS isn't encrypted and its a pretty insecure and outdated technology nowadays, and if you're using it through Google Voice, Google will 100% have full access to your texts and calls through the number, which is obviously pretty horrible for privacy, especially with Google's terrible reputation and track record. If privacy is your concern, I'd recommend JMP. Its very... Source: 10 months ago
View more

Converse.JS mentions (9)

  • An actually private messaging self hosted server
    I agree. IMHO the best variant is then to use something that is truely free. Like XMPP. There are a lot of servers and many clients to chose from and I can strongly recommend converse.js as a web client. It supports different ways of end to end encryption but I would recommend OMEMO which is basically the same encryption idea that you find in Signal. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Xmpp Bot with its own address.
    Hello, I recently started exploring xmpp, with snikket app and conversejs.org. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Matrix was worth the effort to self host.
    It is Converse.js (https://conversejs.org/) packaged into a one-click install for openfire (from the web admin). So, one-click install for an xmpp web client. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: What is your recommended stack for real time chat?
    My choice, because it's the stack I know very well, would be Prosody ( https://prosody.im/ - I'm one of the devs) and a web client such as Converse.js ( https://conversejs.org/ ). XMPP is highly extensible, Prosody is highly modular, which make them a good foundation for building on top of. That said, the right stack is generally the one that matches your requirements, and (if this isn't primarily a learning... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • No white list registering with conversejs.org
    Tried to register with conversejs.org today and got an error "your IP is not whitelisted". Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JMP.chat and Converse.JS, you can also consider the following products

VoIP.ms - VoIP.ms is a VoIP origination and termination tool.

tawk.to - tawk.to is a free live chat app that lets you monitor and chat with visitors on your website or from a free customizable page

Sudo - Sudo is an automated smart sales assistant.

Rocket.Chat - Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework.

Crypton.sh - SMS - Secure Anonymous SMS in the cloud (and a phone number)

Lets Chat - Open source self-hosted chat app for small teams