Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Converse.JS VS Rocket.Chat

Compare Converse.JS VS Rocket.Chat and see what are their differences

Converse.JS logo Converse.JS

A free and open-source chat client for your website

Rocket.Chat logo Rocket.Chat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework.
  • Converse.JS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28
  • Rocket.Chat Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-05-23

Rocket.Chat

$ Details
Release Date
2016 January
Startup details
Country
Brazil
Founder(s)
Gabriel Engel
Employees
50 - 99

Converse.JS features and specs

  • Open Source
    Converse.JS is open-source, which means that it is free to use and can be modified to fit specific needs. This allows for broad community support and contributions.
  • XMPP Protocol
    It operates on the XMPP protocol which is a mature and open standard for messaging, providing robust real-time messaging capabilities.
  • Easy Integration
    Converse.JS can be easily integrated into existing systems or web applications due to its flexibility and the fact that it is a JavaScript library.
  • Customizable
    The library offers a high level of customization, enabling developers to tailor the UI and features to closely match their application's needs.
  • Rich Features
    It supports features such as group chats, chat rooms, message archiving, and more, making it a comprehensive solution for chat functionalities.
  • Mobile Friendly
    Designed to be responsive, Converse.JS works well on mobile devices, providing a good user experience across different screen sizes.

Possible disadvantages of Converse.JS

  • Learning Curve
    While powerful, Converse.JS can have a steep learning curve for developers who are not familiar with XMPP or the intricacies of setting up chat services.
  • Requires Server Setup
    To function properly, Converse.JS requires a compatible XMPP server, which may add to the setup and maintenance overhead.
  • Browser Compatibility
    Some users might experience issues on older or less common browsers, as modern JavaScript libraries often rely on up-to-date browser capabilities.
  • Scalability Concerns
    For very large-scale applications, using XMPP and Converse.JS might require additional configuration and optimization efforts to ensure scalability.

Rocket.Chat features and specs

  • Open Source
    Rocket.Chat is open source, which means it is freely available for anyone to download, modify, and use. This allows for extensive customization and flexibility.
  • Data Privacy
    Since Rocket.Chat is self-hosted, organizations have complete control over their data, ensuring higher privacy and compliance with data protection regulations.
  • Extensive Integrations
    Rocket.Chat offers numerous integrations with popular tools and services like GitHub, Jira, and Google Drive, enhancing its functionality and adaptability.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    The platform supports various devices, including web browsers, mobile devices (iOS and Android), and desktop applications, enabling seamless communication.
  • Active Community
    Rocket.Chat boasts an active and engaged developer community, which frequently contributes new features, bug fixes, and enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of Rocket.Chat

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup of Rocket.Chat can be complex, especially for users without technical expertise. It may require advanced server knowledge and maintenance.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Rocket.Chat on-premises can be resource-intensive, requiring adequate server hardware and performance optimizations to handle large-scale environments.
  • Limited Free Support
    While Rocket.Chat is free to use, official support and advanced features are typically part of their paid plans, which might be a limitation for some organizations.
  • User Interface Complexity
    Some users find the interface to be less intuitive compared to other chat applications, potentially leading to a steeper learning curve.
  • Scalability Challenges
    Scaling Rocket.Chat for very large organizations or communities can present challenges and might require substantial technical expertise to manage effectively.

Converse.JS videos

Real-Time Chat on the Web How to use XMPP and Converse.js to integrate webchat into any website

Rocket.Chat videos

What does Rocket.Chat look like?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Converse.JS and Rocket.Chat)
Communication
10 10%
90% 90
Group Chat & Notifications
Customer Support
100 100%
0% 0
Messaging
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Converse.JS and Rocket.Chat. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Converse.JS and Rocket.Chat

Converse.JS Reviews

We have no reviews of Converse.JS yet.
Be the first one to post

Rocket.Chat Reviews

7 best Mattermost alternatives for secure business messaging
While Mattermost supports internal communication, Rocket.Chat has extended abilities that promote internal as well as external communication with customers, suppliers, vendors, and others. Also, the platform attaches paramount importance to data security and has advanced features like self-hosting, end-to-end encryption, two-factor authentication, custom user controls, and...
Source: www.rocket.chat
Top 10 Webex alternatives in 2024
Let us know if you want to have a quick chat with our team over here at Rocket.Chat to go through the most important advantages Rocket.Chat holds over Webex.
Source: www.rocket.chat

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Rocket.Chat should be more popular than Converse.JS. It has been mentiond 67 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Converse.JS mentions (10)

  • Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (February 2025)
    Taking a sabbatical and spending more time on an open source XMPP web client that I started 10 years ago already. https://conversejs.org The website is a bit old, but lots of exciting changes are happening under the hood and I finally have the time to make big architectural and performance improvements. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • An actually private messaging self hosted server
    I agree. IMHO the best variant is then to use something that is truely free. Like XMPP. There are a lot of servers and many clients to chose from and I can strongly recommend converse.js as a web client. It supports different ways of end to end encryption but I would recommend OMEMO which is basically the same encryption idea that you find in Signal. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Xmpp Bot with its own address.
    Hello, I recently started exploring xmpp, with snikket app and conversejs.org. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Matrix was worth the effort to self host.
    It is Converse.js (https://conversejs.org/) packaged into a one-click install for openfire (from the web admin). So, one-click install for an xmpp web client. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: What is your recommended stack for real time chat?
    My choice, because it's the stack I know very well, would be Prosody ( https://prosody.im/ - I'm one of the devs) and a web client such as Converse.js ( https://conversejs.org/ ). XMPP is highly extensible, Prosody is highly modular, which make them a good foundation for building on top of. That said, the right stack is generally the one that matches your requirements, and (if this isn't primarily a learning... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
View more

Rocket.Chat mentions (67)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Converse.JS and Rocket.Chat, you can also consider the following products

tawk.to - tawk.to is a free live chat app that lets you monitor and chat with visitors on your website or from a free customizable page

Slack - A messaging app for teams who see through the Earth!

Openfire - Openfire (formerly Wildfire) is a cross-platform instant messaging (IM) and groupchat server.

Mattermost - Mattermost is an open source alternative to Slack.

Prosody - Prosody is a modern flexible communications server for Jabber/XMPP written in Lua.

Element.io - Secure messaging app with strong end-to-end encryption, advanced group chat privacy settings, secure video calls for teams, encrypted communication using Matrix open network. Riot.im is now Element.