Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Jekyll VS BuildKit

Compare Jekyll VS BuildKit and see what are their differences

Zarla
Zarla: The AI Website Builder for Local Businesses featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Jekyll logo Jekyll

Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

BuildKit logo BuildKit

BuildKit is an open-source toolkit manager application that allows you to build the artifacts in a minimum time frame and helps you to gather the garbage automatically.
  • Jekyll Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-17
  • BuildKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-02

Jekyll features and specs

  • Speed and Performance
    Jekyll generates static websites, which means they load faster compared to dynamic websites. No database queries are required, reducing server overhead and improving performance.
  • Security
    Static sites have a smaller attack surface compared to dynamic sites because they don't rely on databases or server-side code. This means fewer vectors for potential compromises.
  • Simplicity
    Jekyll setups are relatively straightforward, especially if you are comfortable writing in Markdown and HTML. This can make it easier to manage and maintain your website.
  • Integration with GitHub Pages
    Jekyll is designed to work seamlessly with GitHub Pages, allowing you to host your website for free with automatic deployment directly from your GitHub repository.
  • Customizability
    Jekyll allows for extensive customization through its support for plugins, themes, and templates. This can be helpful to create a unique look and functionality for your website.

Possible disadvantages of Jekyll

  • Learning Curve
    While Jekyll is simpler than some other static site generators, it does require some familiarity with the command line, version control (Git), and YAML configuration.
  • Build Time
    For large websites, the build times can become lengthy, which can slow down the development process, especially if you are making frequent updates.
  • Lack of Real-time Content Updates
    Since Jekyll generates static sites, real-time content updates (e.g., comments, dynamic forms) aren't natively supported and require third-party services or additional tooling.
  • Dependence on Ruby
    Jekyll is built with Ruby, so you will need to have Ruby installed and occasionally deal with Ruby-specific issues. This might be a drawback for developers who are not familiar with the Ruby ecosystem.
  • Limited Built-in Functionality
    While Jekyll is very flexible, it doesn’t have built-in support for many features out of the box, which might require you to manually implement or rely on plugins.

BuildKit features and specs

  • Improved Caching
    BuildKit offers enhanced caching mechanisms that can significantly speed up the build process. It supports more efficient layer caching and is capable of parallelizing builds, allowing for faster image creation and reduced rebuild times.
  • Parallel Build Stages
    BuildKit's ability to parallelize the processing of build stages allows for more efficient use of resources, reducing the overall time needed to compile and assemble Docker images.
  • Flexible Syntax
    It supports advanced Dockerfile syntax, such as 'RUN --mount=type=cache', enabling more granular control over build operations, which can help optimize the build process and reduce size and time.
  • Security Improvements
    BuildKit adds security features like rootless builds and build secrets, allowing developers to create safer environments by limiting the need for superuser permissions and securely managing sensitive information during builds.
  • Reduced Build Context
    BuildKit can help minimize the build context sent to the Docker daemon, optimizing network usage and performance by only sending necessary files.

Possible disadvantages of BuildKit

  • Complexity
    For users familiar with the traditional Docker build system, the new features and functionalities of BuildKit, such as the advanced syntax and caching options, may introduce added complexity and a steeper learning curve.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Not all environments and Dockerfile features are fully compatible with BuildKit's advanced capabilities, which might require adjustments or limit its applicability in certain scenarios.
  • Resource Consumption
    Due to its parallel processing capabilities, BuildKit might consume more resources than traditional builds, potentially leading to increased CPU and memory usage.
  • Maturation Level
    As a relatively newer tool, BuildKit may still face occasional bugs and is in an ongoing state of development, which can impact stability and reliability for production environments.

Analysis of Jekyll

Overall verdict

  • Jekyll is a good choice for individuals and organizations looking for a straightforward, reliable, and efficient way to build static websites. Its strengths include simplicity, flexibility, and strong community support, which contribute to a smooth development experience.

Why this product is good

  • Jekyll is a popular static site generator that is widely appreciated for its simplicity, speed, and ease of use. It is particularly suited for creating blogs and simple websites, leveraging Markdown and Liquid templates to generate static HTML content. Its integration with GitHub Pages also makes it a convenient choice for developers and non-developers alike who want to host their sites directly from their GitHub repositories without additional setup or cost.

Recommended for

  • Bloggers and content creators looking for a simple way to publish content online.
  • Developers who prefer writing in Markdown and managing content with a version control system.
  • Users who want to host their sites for free using GitHub Pages.
  • Anyone in need of a static site generator that is easy to set up, customize, and maintain with minimal resources.

Jekyll videos

+ Add

Getting Started With Jekyll, The Static Site Generator

BuildKit videos

No BuildKit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Jekyll and BuildKit)

Jekyll

BuildKit

CMS
100 100%
CMS
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
Cloud Computing
100% 100
Blogging
100 100%
Blogging
0% 0
OS & Utilities
0 0%
OS & Utilities
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Jekyll and BuildKit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Jekyll and BuildKit

Jekyll Reviews

Best Gitbook Alternatives You Need to Try in 2023
Jekyll is a static site generator often used to create blogs and websites, similar to Gitbook in its ability to generate documentation from markdown files. Jekyll is built in Ruby and is known for its flexibility and ease of use. It also has a large community and a wide variety of plugins and themes available. Jekyll's main advantage is that it is highly customizable,...
Source: www.archbee.com
11 Popular Free And Open Source WordPress CMS alternatives in 2021
Unlike some listed alternatives, Jekyll is also a static site generator so it lays in the same category. It uses Ruby and we would say it's simpler, free, and open-source CMS software.
Source: medevel.com
10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Jekyll isn’t strict with its content location. It expects pages in the root of your site, and will build whatever’s there. Here’s how you might organize these pages in your Jekyll site root:
Source: www.freecodecamp.org
9 Reasons I Think Craft is the Best CMS on the Market Today
Craft CMS is simple, minimalistic, agile and has every capability a modern CMS framework needs. Over the past ten years we have worked with every CMS you could think of (Wordpress, Drupal, Rails+ActiveAdmin, Ghost, Weebly, DjangoCMS, Jekyll, Joomla, Tumblr, Squarespace, Expression Engine, Statamic, Blogger)… here are the reasons why we’ve landed firmly with Craft as our №1...
Source: hackernoon.com

BuildKit Reviews

We have no reviews of BuildKit yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Jekyll seems to be a lot more popular than BuildKit. While we know about 195 links to Jekyll, we've tracked only 1 mention of BuildKit. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Jekyll mentions (195)

  • Building PicoSSG: 'Just Enough Code'
    The static site generator (SSG) landscape is crowded with feature-rich but increasingly complex solutions. As I looked at and used tools like lume, 11ty, lektor, or jekyll, I found myself drowning in configuration options, plugins, and middleware. What started as a simple desire to convert Markdown content into HTML had evolved into learning complex frameworks with steep learning curves. - Source: dev.to / 24 days ago
  • How to create a blog with Quartz, GitHub, and Cloudflare
    If you don't want to use Jekyll as your static site generator for GitHub Pages and you want to have a custom domain for your GitHub Pages. This post is for you! - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Blogging with Obsidian and Jekyll
    Jekyll is a static site generator that transforms Markdown files into a fully functional website. Everything is generated into plain HTML, which makes it simple to deploy on platforms like GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Create a Blogging Platform With No Backend (Zero Hosting Fee)
    Obviously, there are a dozen choices for generating static websites (efficiently and quickly), from the classic Jekyll to the new Next.js. And you are good to go with any of them as long as your confident with it. I choose 11ty because:. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • It's easy to dev blog
    In your repository settings you need to turn on GitHub Pages to make it pull Jekyll content (that's the magic✨ default GitHub Pages build tool) from your GitHub repository. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

BuildKit mentions (1)

  • Su issues within a pod
    It does look odd but its valid. It’s dockerfile buildkit secret mount. Https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/build_enhancements/. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Jekyll and BuildKit, you can also consider the following products

Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.

Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

ZeroVM - ZeroVM is an open source virtualization technology that is based on the Chromium Native Client project.

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.

Crane - Crane is a docker image builder to approach light-weight ML users who want to expand a container image with custom apt/conda/pip packages without writing any Dockerfile.

Loading...