Software Alternatives & Reviews

Isabelle VS Steel Bank Common Lisp

Compare Isabelle VS Steel Bank Common Lisp and see what are their differences

Isabelle logo Isabelle

Isabelle is a proof assistant for writing and checking mathematical proofs by computer.

Steel Bank Common Lisp logo Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.
  • Isabelle Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-29
  • Steel Bank Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-24

Isabelle videos

*NEW* ISABELLE Skin! Reactive Test | Gameplay + Combos | Before You Buy (Fortnite Battle Royale)

More videos:

  • Review - Isabelle skin gameplay and review
  • Review - Should You Buy? ISABELLE Skin Fortnite (Fortnite Season 6)

Steel Bank Common Lisp videos

No Steel Bank Common Lisp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Isabelle and Steel Bank Common Lisp)
Programming Language
24 24%
76% 76
OOP
31 31%
69% 69
IDE
0 0%
100% 100
Generic Programming Language

User comments

Share your experience with using Isabelle and Steel Bank Common Lisp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Steel Bank Common Lisp seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Isabelle mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Isabelle yet. Tracking of Isabelle recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Steel Bank Common Lisp mentions (5)

  • Not only Clojure – Chez Scheme: Lisp with native code speed
    Tangential: if we're talking Lisp and native code speed, Steel Bank Common Lisp (by default) compiles everything to machine code. [0] https://sbcl.org. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • A few newbie questions about lisp
    Q5: Get http://sbcl.org/. Install https://quicklisp.org/. SBCL is the implementation that's the lowest friction, and Quicklisp is a package manager that's almost* painless. Source: 12 months ago
  • [C++20][safety] static_assert is all you need (no leaks, no UB)
    That is what we do in Lisp. Try sbcl if you haven't tried it yet. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Trying to wrap my head around `xbps-src`
    I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Areas in Programming to Avoid
    > Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Isabelle and Steel Bank Common Lisp, you can also consider the following products

Agda - Agda is a dependently typed functional programming language. It has inductive families, i.e.

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

Coq - Coq is a proof assistant, which allows you to write mathematical proofs in a rigorous and formal...

CMU Common Lisp - CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

Lean - Clean up your Live Photos

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.