interviewing.io Reviews

Celestia Reviews

interviewing.io mentions (96)

• Ask HN: Any previous experience with interviewing.io dedicated coaches?

  Interviewing.io[1] lets users to practice mock interviews (coding interviews) with peers or professional interviewers. These interviews are anonymous. They also offer mentorship sessions with “dedicated coaches” from FAANG or other backgrounds. They claim 99% satisfaction rate and 82% of success (landing a job in the desired company). It sounds really vague and difficult to verify due to the anonymous aspect. Does... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• Guidance for cracking coding interviews

  There is also https://interviewing.io/, but that platform is a rip off. Either you need to pay an arm and a leg, or you need to trade two interviews that you do for others in exchange for a single interview that you receive. Pramp is much better in that respect. With Pramp, you interview the other job-hunter for 30 minutes and they interview you for 30 minutes. It's a much fairer exchange. Source: 6 months ago

• Failing C++ Job Interviews

  There are also some services I've used in the past like https://interviewing.io/ that give mock interviews with actual feedback from a human instead of the blank wall that is every company's recruiting team (I think they will give you a few mock interviews for free in exchange for the chance to refer you to a few tech companies.). Source: 7 months ago

• I'm Sorry I Bit You During My Job Interview

  I'm not affiliated with them, but it seems like paying for a one time consultation/mock interview through https://interviewing.io/ might help uncover something useful. It does suck to have to pay to hear the "other side". Is this "Honesty as a Service"..? - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Not sure how to get my career started

  Here is the founder of interviewing.io making many of the same points: https://blog.alinelerner.com/how-different-is-a-b-s-in-computer-science-from-a-m-s-in-computer-science-when-it-comes-to-recruiting/. Source: 11 months ago

Celestia mentions (27)

• ESASky

  Pretty much everything beyond our solar system is essentially fixed on a human timescale. Over 2000 years, a typical star will move about half a degree. That's the width of the moon in the sky. There are of course notable exceptions like Barnard's Star, whose movement is pretty obvious on photographs taken over several decades. If you want to explore how space changes over time, I recommend you look into... - Source: Hacker News / about 17 hours ago

• My 9 year old nephews drawing of stars

  I think Celestia could be a good one. I also thought about SpaceEngine, but AFAIK it was kind of terrible at generating realistic planetary systems, among other things (pricey, huge, etc.). Source: over 1 year ago

• What are the best resources to explore space from my computer?

  Celestia was something I played with before. Pretty interesting. Source: over 1 year ago

• Lunar Occultation of Mars

  Celestia looks as though it would do it. Source: over 1 year ago

• Tips to visualize Apollo 17 trajectory

  I'm looking for data and software to visualize the Apollo 17 trajectory (especially the "powered descent", lunar rendezvous and entry). I'm thinking of using celestia. I'm look for a data tables as well (time stamp, position for each part of the stack). Any tips are appreciated. Source: over 1 year ago