InterestExplorer VS PostImage.org

InterestExplorer Reviews

PostImage.org Reviews

InterestExplorer mentions (3)

• Have you tried interestexplorer.io, are the hidden interests efficient?

  What got me wondering about this is that I found YouTube videos claiming that hidden interests that you can't find on the main Facebook search in detailed targeting. Also in the promotional video of "interestexplorer.io" they mention this and they say that you have an advantage compared to other marketers who use the usual interests. Source: about 1 year ago

• Have you tried interestexplorer.io, are the hidden interests efficient?

  I recently started searching for how to optimize my campaigns. I found that there are some hidden interests that Facebook doesn't display on the usual interests explorer. Those interests could only be accessed through Facebook API. I found a site "interestexplorer.io" I'm wondering if this site could help improve campaign performance by targeting hidden audiences. So you can improve your performance and ROI. Any... Source: about 1 year ago

• Does anyone already tested "Interest Explorer" ?

  I am working in social media advertising and I would like to try https://interestexplorer.io/ in order to build audiences for my clients. Source: over 1 year ago

PostImage.org mentions (343)

• How to test open graph meta tags locally ?

  Local images won't share directly, upload the images in postimages or imgbb first, use the url in the meta tags. Then click the extension again to create a new sharer link! - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Topography [3440x1440]

  I think sometimes the png downloaded from here may be compressed too. Compare the file sizes. From now on I think I will use postimages.org to supplement my posts. It is quick and easy to use. Maximum 10,000 pixels images make note. Source: 5 months ago

• Surface Interpolation

  You can host the image free (e.g. https://postimages.org/) and drop a link here. I don't understand the role of the ray in the fitting. Or is it that you want to just intersect the ray with the surface after fitting? In that case your problem breaks naturally into two parts. Source: 5 months ago

• Topography [3440x1440]

  Maybe consider using postimages.org as an additional link in the comments, so we can DL your full sized pngs. Bewilderingly, these are the 3 different images /variants I could download from a single one of your images. 6mb, 2mb and the .webp is 320kb! Source: 5 months ago

• Reddit Compression Test/Please Ignore [5160x2160]

  On and off. I distinctly remember testing some of my posts and the downloaded jpgs were the same size as the originals,not compressed down to 350kb! I wish I could find the set criteria they are working to. In the meantime I think using postimages.org after posting might be the way to go. Source: 5 months ago