Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Inferno VS WPF Toolkit

Compare Inferno VS WPF Toolkit and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Inferno logo Inferno

An extremely fast React-like javascript library for building modern user interfaces.

WPF Toolkit logo WPF Toolkit

All the controls missing in WPF. Over 1 million downloads. - GitHub - xceedsoftware/wpftoolkit: All the controls missing in WPF. Over 1 million downloads.
  • Inferno Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-11
  • WPF Toolkit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24

Inferno features and specs

  • High Performance
    Inferno is known for its impressive speed and performance, often comparable to or surpassing many other front-end frameworks and libraries, making it suitable for high-performance applications.
  • React-Like API
    Inferno uses a similar API to React, which makes it easier for developers who are already familiar with React to transition to or integrate Inferno.
  • Compatibility
    Due to its React-like API, Inferno can work with many existing React components and libraries, enhancing its versatility and integration capabilities.
  • Small Size
    Inferno has a small footprint, reducing load times and improving overall application performance, especially on mobile devices and slower networks.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Inferno supports server-side rendering out of the box, allowing for faster initial page loads and better SEO.

Possible disadvantages of Inferno

  • Smaller Community
    Inferno has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to more widely used libraries and frameworks like React, potentially leading to fewer resources, plugins, and support.
  • Limited Third-Party Libraries
    While compatibility with React libraries is a strength, there are still fewer third-party libraries specifically designed for Inferno, which can limit development options in some scenarios.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are not familiar with React, there can be a learning curve associated with understanding the Inferno API and concepts.
  • Infrequent Updates
    Compared to larger projects like React, Inferno may have less frequent updates and new feature releases, which can impact the adoption of the latest web development trends.
  • Less Market Demand
    There is currently less market demand for developers proficient in Inferno compared to those skilled in more popular frameworks and libraries, potentially affecting job prospects and opportunities.

WPF Toolkit features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Inferno videos

+ Add

Inferno - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - Inferno - Movie Review
  • Review - Inferno - Official Movie Review

WPF Toolkit videos

No WPF Toolkit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Inferno and WPF Toolkit)

Inferno

WPF Toolkit

Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0
Cross-Platform Development
0 0%
Cross-Platform Development
100% 100
JavaScript Framework
100 100%
JavaScript Framework
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Inferno and WPF Toolkit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Inferno and WPF Toolkit

Inferno Reviews

The Best JavaScript Frameworks You’re Not Using
There isn’t an overall number we can use to gauge performance on the chart above, but smaller numbers are better. Obviously, Inferno performs very well again. If you’re a React developer and have a project that requires excellent performance, Inferno is definitely something you should consider. We’ll finish with this from the Inferno “About” page:
Source: jsreport.io

WPF Toolkit Reviews

12 Best Frameworks and Toolkits to Build Desktop Applications
As the name suggests, the WPF Toolkit by Xceed Software comes with WPF components, controls, and utilities for developing next-generation Windows applications. Professional developers use the toolkit for creating high-performing WPF applications for Windows desktops.
Source: geekflare.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Inferno should be more popular than WPF Toolkit. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Inferno mentions (2)

  • Solid vs React - the Fastest VS the Most Popular UI Library
    Some might argue that React’s relatively poor performance (it’s still plenty-fast for many apps) is due to Virtual DOM and prioritization of development experience, i.e., clarity over complexity. To counter the first argument - there’s React-like Inferno. For the second one - there’s Solid. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • A Look at Compilation in JavaScript Frameworks
    A VDOM library like Inferno uses this information to compile its JSX directly into pre-optimized node structures. Marko, and Vue hoist their static VDOM nodes outside of their components so that they don't incur the overhead of recreating them on every render. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

WPF Toolkit mentions (1)

  • Extended WPF Toolkit include advanced input controls, layouts, and themes
    And there are more. Note it's free for non-commercial use, check their GitHub page for more details: Https://github.com/xceedsoftware/wpftoolkit. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Inferno and WPF Toolkit, you can also consider the following products

Preact.js - Preact is a fast 3kB alternative to React with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.

UWP - UWP is one of many ways to create client applications for Windows. UWP apps use WinRT APIs to provide powerful UI and advanced asynchronous features that are ideal for internet-connected devices.

Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps

Qt - Powerful, flexible and easy to use, Qt will help you not only meet your tight deadline, but also reduce the maintainable code by an astonishing percentage.

Deku - Functional view library for building UI components as an alternative to React

EnactJS - An app development framework built atop React that’s easy to use, performant and customizable.

Loading...