Software Alternatives & Reviews

iCompaas VS Signed Pages

Compare iCompaas VS Signed Pages and see what are their differences

iCompaas logo iCompaas

Cloud infrastructure Compliance, CyberSecurity and Cost Saving as-a-Service

Signed Pages logo Signed Pages

A browser extension to verify the authenticity of websites
  • iCompaas Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-26

iCompaas provides a suite of tools and services to maintain the Compliance and Security posture of your cloud infrastructure. We automate services of a Cloud Security Specialist, a Compliance Analyst, and a Cloud Architect all rolled into one product.

Our services helps companies focus on faster time to market by taking care of the cloud infrastructure security and compliance roadblocks by providing remediation reports for Certifications, Regulations and Frameworks for your Cloud infrastructure.

Automate the enforcement of compliance standards including CIS and HIPAA, using real-time, secure, agentless auditing, notification and remediation.

  • Signed Pages Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-05

iCompaas

$ Details
freemium $100.0 / Monthly (Lite Tier - Per Account)
Platforms
AWS
Release Date
2020 June

Signed Pages

Website
github.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

iCompaas features and specs

  • Cloud-based: Yes
  • Security: yes
  • Compliance Management: Yes
  • Cost Management: Yes
  • Cyber Security: Yes
  • Cost Savings: Yes
  • Compliance: Yes

Signed Pages features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

iCompaas videos

iCompaas provides a suite of tools and services to maintain the Compliance and Security posture of your cloud infrastructure. We automate services of a Cloud Security Specialist, a Compliance Analyst, and a Cloud Architect all rolled into one product.

Signed Pages videos

No Signed Pages videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to iCompaas and Signed Pages)
Developer Tools
69 69%
31% 31
SaaS
63 63%
37% 37
Tech
72 72%
28% 28
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using iCompaas and Signed Pages. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Signed Pages seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

iCompaas mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of iCompaas yet. Tracking of iCompaas recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Signed Pages mentions (12)

  • E2EE on the web: is the web that bad?
    There is "Signed Pages" by the debeloper of EteSync. It is a browser extension, that checks webapps based on signatures in the html file. The addon then warns the user if the signature is not correct or - if I remember correctly - the source changed. This allows you to be sure what webapp code was delivered. But it seems like it did not really get used outside of his own projects. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Cloudflare and CDNs - call for community opinions
    EteSync has implemented something called Signed Pages, this might be worth looking closer at. This uses PGP keys which is preloaded into the browser; but I suspect that will be a barrier too high for most non-tech users. Source: 12 months ago
  • Truly safe?
    There are also projects like signed web pages which can also help increasing the trust level to some degree. But that requires that you can download the source code and regenerate the verification hash locally - or have other trusted methods to verify the hash value hasn't been modified as well. The current concept is reasonably sane, but it requires too much from users currently to make it widely used. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Security experts declare all Proton apps secure after security audit
    > The server can at any time start serving malicious payloads True, and I call this threat model "Beware Each and Every Fetch" (BEEF) in contrast to the more common TOFU model (although if you trust a desktop app to auto-update itself then these two models might not be all that different). In any case, I think you're being a little quick to dismiss the idea of server-hosted applications. It's true that browsers... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • ProtonMail Is Inherently Insecure, Your Emails Are Likely Compromised
    Something like a browser extension for this does already exist, fortunately: https://github.com/tasn/webext-signed-pages. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing iCompaas and Signed Pages, you can also consider the following products

Gold Fig - Version control for settings pages

Marshal - Quickly scan your cloud for exposed sensitive information.

The Security Checklist - The Practical Security Checklist for Web Developers

Oatfin - Painless cloud infrastructure

Google Capture the Flag 2017 - Google's 2nd annual worldwide security competition

DivvyCloud - Learn why customers love and trust DivvyCloud