Software Alternatives & Reviews

IBM UrbanCode Build VS Opa

Compare IBM UrbanCode Build VS Opa and see what are their differences

IBM UrbanCode Build logo IBM UrbanCode Build

IBM UrbanCode Build is a continuous integration and build management server optimized for the enterprise.

Opa logo Opa

Opa is an open source, simple and unified platform for writing web applications.
  • IBM UrbanCode Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-11
  • Opa Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16

IBM UrbanCode Build videos

No IBM UrbanCode Build videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Opa videos

My food review at Opa of Greece!

More videos:

  • Review - Classic Game Room - OPA OPA review for Sega Mark III

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to IBM UrbanCode Build and Opa)
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
100% 100
Continuous Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using IBM UrbanCode Build and Opa. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Opa seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

IBM UrbanCode Build mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of IBM UrbanCode Build yet. Tracking of IBM UrbanCode Build recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Opa mentions (3)

  • Imba – The friendly full-stack language
    I remember Opa http://opalang.org/ tried something similar at the time when MongoDB was new and modern. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Ask HN: What web frameworks/technologies did not succeed as per your expectation
    We come across some web frameworks and technologies that we think will succeed, but they wither away as time passes by and don't succeed to the level we expected. Which web frameworks and or technologies did you come across that you thought would succeed but did not as per your expectations? For example, I thought that Opa Lang[0] and UrWeb[1] would succeed but did not, even though the ideas were sound. [0]... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Modern JavaScript:Everything you missed over the last 10 years(ECMAScript 2020)
    I think the Opa language was doing JSX-like code in the frontend before JSX http://opalang.org/ Both Opa and JSX were created in 2011. Opa had other innovations as well, such having the same code base run on both client and server (like Next.js). Unfortunately it didn't get traction and was abandoned by the creators. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing IBM UrbanCode Build and Opa, you can also consider the following products

Apache Maven - Apache Maven is a project comprehension and management software tool.

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

Franz Allegro CL - Allegro CL is the most powerful dynamic object-oriented development system, and is especially suited to enterprise-wide, complex application development.

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

RapidDeploy - RapidDeploy is a powerful application release and deployment automation tool.

ember.js - A JavaScript framework for creating ambitious web apps