Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

IBM Cloud Object Storage VS rkt

Compare IBM Cloud Object Storage VS rkt and see what are their differences

IBM Cloud Object Storage logo IBM Cloud Object Storage

IBM Cloud Object Storage is a platform that offers cost-effective and scalable cloud storage for unstructured data.

rkt logo rkt

App Container runtime
  • IBM Cloud Object Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18
  • rkt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08

IBM Cloud Object Storage features and specs

  • Scalability
    IBM Cloud Object Storage offers very high scalability, allowing businesses to store large amounts of data easily. This flexibility is crucial for businesses that are growing their storage needs or have fluctuating demands.
  • Data Resiliency
    The service provides robust data resiliency options, including geo-dispersed storage configurations, enabling enhanced protection against data loss and improved availability.
  • Cost Efficiency
    With its flexible pricing model, businesses can choose options that best fit their budget, such as 'Pay-as-you-go' plans, thereby optimizing costs according to actual usage.
  • Security Features
    It comes with comprehensive security features, including encryption, access control, and integration with IAM policies, ensuring that data is protected both at rest and in transit.
  • Integration
    Seamless integration with the broader IBM Cloud ecosystem, as well as other cloud services and applications, allows businesses to easily incorporate this storage solution into their existing cloud strategy.

Possible disadvantages of IBM Cloud Object Storage

  • Complexity
    The extensive feature set and customization options might lead to a steeper learning curve for new users or smaller teams without dedicated IT resources.
  • Performance Variability
    Depending on the region and specific use case, users might encounter variability in performance, particularly in scenarios requiring low-latency or high-throughput data access.
  • Support Availability
    While IBM offers various support plans, certain users might find the support mechanisms, such as community forums and basic plans, less responsive compared to some other providers.
  • Pricing Complexity
    Although pricing models are flexible, they can also become complex and convoluted, making it difficult for some businesses to predict costs precisely without detailed monitoring and analysis.
  • Limited Proprietary Tooling
    Compared to some competitors, IBM might have fewer proprietary tools and native applications directly integrated with their cloud storage, potentially requiring additional third-party tools or custom development for specific needs.

rkt features and specs

  • Compatibility
    rkt supports the App Container (appc) spec and can also run Docker container images, providing flexibility and compatibility with various container formats.
  • Security
    rkt is designed with security in mind, offering features like process isolation through Linux namespaces, user namespaces, and SELinux/AppArmor integration.
  • Isolation
    rkt runs applications in their own stage1 environments, ensuring strong isolation between containers and better resource management.
  • Modularity
    rkt is built with a modular architecture, allowing users to swap out the stage1 implementation to better fit their needs.
  • Lightweight
    rkt avoids running a central daemon, thus using fewer system resources and simplifying debugging and monitoring.

Possible disadvantages of rkt

  • Maturity
    rkt is not as mature as Docker, meaning it may lack some features and integrations that have been developed for Docker.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    rkt has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Docker, which may limit the availability of third-party tools and support.
  • Adoption
    rkt has lower adoption rates, leading to fewer tutorials, guides, and community-driven content, which can make the learning curve steeper.
  • Development Activity
    rkt's development and maintenance activity is not as high as Docker's, which could impact long-term viability and feature development.
  • Enterprise Support
    Enterprise-grade support and services for rkt may not be as widely available or comprehensive as those for Docker.

IBM Cloud Object Storage videos

IBM Cloud Object Storage: Built for business

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started with IBM Cloud Object Storage
  • Review - IBM Cloud Object Storage webinar

rkt videos

RKT IPO Review | Is Rocket a Buy for 2020? | Matt Mulvihill

More videos:

  • Review - 2018 Niner RKT 9 RDO - First Look and Build Kit Overview
  • Review - Best Stock Picks Today | RKT Stock 9-2-20

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to IBM Cloud Object Storage and rkt)
Cloud Storage
71 71%
29% 29
Cloud Computing
68 68%
32% 32
Object Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using IBM Cloud Object Storage and rkt. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare IBM Cloud Object Storage and rkt

IBM Cloud Object Storage Reviews

We have no reviews of IBM Cloud Object Storage yet.
Be the first one to post

rkt Reviews

5 Container Alternatives to Docker
In 2018, 12 percent of production containers were rkt (pronounced “Rocket”). Rkt supports two types of images: Docker and appc. A selling point of rkt is its pod-based process that works out of the box with Kubernetes (also referred to as “rktnetes”). In Kubernetes, an rkt container runtime can easily be specified:

What are some alternatives?

When comparing IBM Cloud Object Storage and rkt, you can also consider the following products

Alibaba Object Storage Service - Alibaba Object Storage Service is an encrypted and secure cloud storage service which stores, processes and accesses massive amounts of data

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage - Storage made simple. Faster than Amazon's S3. Less expensive than Glacier.

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Contabo Object Storage - S3-compatible cloud object storage with unlimited, free transfer at a fraction of what others charge. Easy migration & predictable billing. Sign up now & save.

Apache ServiceMix - Apache ServiceMix is an open source ESB that combines the functionality of a Service Oriented Architecture and the modularity.