Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

IBM Bluemix Container Service VS Flox

Compare IBM Bluemix Container Service VS Flox and see what are their differences

IBM Bluemix Container Service logo IBM Bluemix Container Service

IBM Bluemix Container Service is a cloud-based service that allows users to run, deploy, and manage the applications of the cloud.

Flox logo Flox

Manage and share development environments with all the frameworks and libraries you need, then publish artifacts anywhere. Harness the power of Nix.
  • IBM Bluemix Container Service Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08
  • Flox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-03-15

IBM Bluemix Container Service videos

No IBM Bluemix Container Service videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Flox videos

A high ponytail in a wig!? Yes, please! Trying on the Flox Hair Sport Pony Wig.

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Flox Pony Wig - Review & How To Wear
  • Review - Flox Syandana Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to IBM Bluemix Container Service and Flox)
OS & Utilities
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
0% 0
Software Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using IBM Bluemix Container Service and Flox. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Flox seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

IBM Bluemix Container Service mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of IBM Bluemix Container Service yet. Tracking of IBM Bluemix Container Service recommendations started around Aug 2022.

Flox mentions (2)

  • Show HN: Brioche – A new Nix-like package manager
    Flox is the best thing I know of for articulating binary dependencies (language runtimes, etc.), which is probably the sweet spot for nix anyways at the moment. Flox uses nix for its backend, but has a simple TOML syntax and is properly humble about what it can do -- but killer at it -- as opposed to promising the world. https://flox.dev. - Source: Hacker News / 14 days ago
  • Nix is a better Docker image builder than Docker's image builder
    Nix and NixOS are in something like the state git was in before GitHub: the fundamental idea is based on more serious computer science than the status quo (SVN, Docker), the plumbing still has some issues but isn’t worse, and the porcelain and docs are just not there for mainstream adoption. I think that might have changed with the release of flox: https://flox.dev, it’s basically seamless (and that’s not... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing IBM Bluemix Container Service and Flox, you can also consider the following products

Azure Container Service - Azure Container Service is a solution that optimizes the configuration of popular open-source tools and technologies specifically for Azure, it provides an open solution that offers portability for both users containers and users application configu…

devenv - Fast, Declarative, Reproducible, and Composable dev envs

AppFormix - AppFormix provides cloud infrastructure performance optimization for OpenStack and Kubernetes.

Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images

DevBox - Everyday utilities for the everyday developer

Crane - Crane is a docker image builder to approach light-weight ML users who want to expand a container image with custom apt/conda/pip packages without writing any Dockerfile.