Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

HTTrack VS Wikipedia

Compare HTTrack VS Wikipedia and see what are their differences

VoIPstudio
VoIPstudio is an award-winning VoIP system that offers businesses of all sizes a scalable communication solution. It’s inexpensive, easy-to-use, offers a full suite of PBX features, and is fully integrated for CRM. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

HTTrack logo HTTrack

HTTrack is a free (GPL, libre/free software) and easy-to-use offline browser utility.

Wikipedia logo Wikipedia

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation.
  • HTTrack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24
  • Wikipedia Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24

HTTrack features and specs

  • Free and Open Source
    HTTrack is completely free to use and its source code is available for modification and redistribution, making it an accessible option for a wide range of users.
  • Cross-Platform
    HTTrack is available for Windows, Linux, and macOS, allowing users to utilize the tool regardless of their operating system.
  • Customizable
    The tool provides a variety of options for customizing the download process, such as adjusting the download speed, depth, and filtering certain file types or URLs.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    HTTrack offers a graphical user interface (GUI) that simplifies the web scraping process, even for users with minimal technical expertise.
  • Offline Browsing
    Users can download entire websites for offline browsing, which is particularly useful in low-bandwidth environments or for archival purposes.

Possible disadvantages of HTTrack

  • Legal and Ethical Concerns
    Downloading entire websites can violate terms of service and copyright laws. Users must ensure they have permission to scrape the content.
  • Resource Intensive
    HTTrack can consume significant bandwidth and disk space, affecting both the user's machine and the target website’s server, which can become a burden for sites with heavy traffic.
  • Complexity in Advanced Use
    While the basic functions are user-friendly, advanced customizations and troubleshooting can be complex and may require technical knowledge.
  • Incomplete or Broken Downloads
    Depending on the website's structure, HTTrack can sometimes fail to download all resources correctly, leading to incomplete or broken pages.
  • Security Risks
    Downloading and storing entire websites locally can pose security risks, especially if malicious scripts or malware are inadvertently downloaded.

Wikipedia features and specs

  • Comprehensive Coverage
    Wikipedia provides information on an enormous range of topics, often in great detail. This makes it an invaluable resource for quick fact-checking, general research, and gaining a surface-level understanding of a subject.
  • Free Access
    Wikipedia is free to use for anyone with internet access, reducing barriers to information and supporting educational equality.
  • Collaborative Editing
    Articles on Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, allowing for a collaborative and dynamic creation and updating process. This can lead to quick corrections and diverse perspectives.
  • Citations and Sources
    Many articles on Wikipedia include citations and references to external sources, which can be useful for further research and verification of the information provided.
  • Multilingual
    Wikipedia is available in numerous languages, which helps make information accessible to a global audience.

Possible disadvantages of Wikipedia

  • Potential for Vandalism
    Because Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, there's a potential for vandalism or the introduction of incorrect information, which can affect the reliability of some articles.
  • Citation Quality
    The quality and reliability of cited sources in Wikipedia articles can vary, and some articles may cite unreliable or biased sources.
  • Subjectivity and Bias
    Despite efforts to maintain neutrality, some articles may contain subjective viewpoints or bias, reflecting the opinions of their contributors.
  • Incomplete Information
    Not all topics are covered equally well on Wikipedia. Lesser-known or more recent topics may have sparse or poorly developed entries.
  • Misleading Editing Practices
    There can be instances where experienced editors dominate the editing process, potentially leading to gatekeeping and exclusion of alternative perspectives or newer editors.

Analysis of HTTrack

Overall verdict

  • HTTrack is generally considered a good tool for its intended purpose of website mirroring. It is reliable, user-friendly, and effective for offline browsing. However, users should ensure they have the proper permissions to copy website content.

Why this product is good

  • HTTrack is a widely-used tool for downloading websites to a local directory, enabling users to navigate and browse offline. It's popular due to its ease of use, functionality, and support for various web pages, including static and dynamic content.

Recommended for

  • Web developers and designers who want to analyze or test websites locally
  • Students conducting research on website structures and content
  • Users who need offline access to websites for travel or in areas with limited internet connectivity

HTTrack videos

+ Add

LABS 5 Mirroring Website Using HTTrack Web Site Copier REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - HakTip - Mirror Websites with HTTrack
  • Tutorial - How to clone any website||How to copy all webpage of a website httrack

Wikipedia videos

+ Add

Wikipedia The Game | Beer and Board Games

More videos:

  • Review - Using Wikipedia on an iPod Mini
  • Review - I Don't Use or Trust Wikipedia Anymore.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to HTTrack and Wikipedia)

HTTrack

Wikipedia

Utilities
100 100%
Utilities
0% 0
Content Collaboration
0 0%
Content Collaboration
100% 100
Download Manager
100 100%
Download Manager
0% 0
Note Taking
0 0%
Note Taking
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using HTTrack and Wikipedia. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare HTTrack and Wikipedia

HTTrack Reviews

15 Best Httrack Alternatives Offline Browser Utility
It offers features such as copying entire websites, selecting specific files to copy, and setting of download limits to manage bandwidth usage. However, WebHTTrack is less customizable than HTTrack, lacking some advanced customization options.
Source: technicalustad.com
15 Best Website Downloaders & Website Copier – Save website locally to read offline
The HTTrack Website Copier will help you build a local copy of a website by recursively looking out for URLs on the site, downloading pages, and other site assets (images, CSS, and JS files) until there is no new URL to be crawled.
Source: www.bestproxyreviews.com
8 Best HTTrack Alternatives and Similar Software
Without a doubt, HTTrack is a fantastic program, however, if you want something comparable, you may try some utilities below. These 8 HTTrack alternatives run on Windows, Mac, and Linux.
Source: www.regendus.com

Wikipedia Reviews

17 open source wiki engine/software
MediaWiki is a free and open source server based wiki engine written in PHP developed by Wikipedia. MediaWiki is an extremely powerful, scalable software and a feature-rich wiki implementation, that uses PHP to process and display data stored in its MySQL database. Pages use MediaWiki’s wiki-text format, so that users without knowledge of XHTML or CSS can edit pages easily...
Source: gadgetxplore.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Wikipedia seems to be a lot more popular than HTTrack. While we know about 127 links to Wikipedia, we've tracked only 2 mentions of HTTrack. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

HTTrack mentions (2)

  • Self Hosted Server For Multiple Types Media
    I Use httrack.com software to download my websites. I am aware of the following software: Ubooquity, TrueNas, Kavita, Plex, MediaMonkey, Jellyfin and MusicBrainzPicard. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How to make RSS download further into the past?
    - I do get the entire text through RSS successfully. - Turns out InoReader caches everything and will never delete it which is why they have it fetched so far back.. - I tried httrack.com without success. - I'm thinking about someone coding something to download each feed post as a PDF, which InoReader gives as a download option for single items. Source: almost 4 years ago

Wikipedia mentions (127)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing HTTrack and Wikipedia, you can also consider the following products

SiteSucker - SiteSucker is a Macintosh application that automatically downloads Web sites from the Internet.

Fandom - The entertainment site where fans come first.

GNU Wget - GNU Wget is a free software package for retrieving files using HTTP(S) and FTP, the most...

Miraheze - Miraheze is a wiki farm (hosts wikis) for free and with no ads, it also provides custom domains...

WebCopy - Cyotek WebCopy is a free tool for copying full or partial websites locally onto your harddisk for offline viewing.

Encyclopædia Britannica - Explore the fact-checked online encyclopedia from Encyclopaedia Britannica with hundreds of thousands of objective articles, biographies, videos, and images from experts.

Loading...