HTTP Reviews

SE Ranking Reviews

HTTP mentions (7)

• Evolving the Web: Discovering the History of HTTP Versions

  HTTP/1.1 was such a game changer for the Internet that it works so well that even through two revisions, RFC 2616 published in June 1999 and RFC 7230– RFC 7235 published in June 2014, HTTP/1.1 was extremely stable until the release of HTTP/2.0 in 2014 — Nearly 18 years later. Before continuing to the next section about HTTP/2.0, let us revisit what journey HTTP/1.1 has been through. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

• Poll: Are client web requests sent to upstream servers or downstream servers?

  On the one hand, it just seems natural that "upstream" refers to the inbound request being sent from one system to another. It takes effort (connection pooling, throttling, retries, etc.) to make a request to an (upstream) dependency, just as it takes effort to swim upstream. The response is (usually) easy... Just return it... hence, "downstream". Recall the usual meaning of "upload" and "download". Upstream seems... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

• How to cache TCP, SSL handshake on ALB?

  To me it sounds like you’ve not solved this as the config you’ve mentioned is about preventing “illegal” (none RFC7230 ) requests, it isn’t really related to the problem you posted. Source: over 2 years ago

• HTTP Protocol Overview

  The program you are using to send data to the server may or may not automatically determine the right content-type header for your data, and knowing how to set and check headers is an essential skill. To learn more about the HTTP protocol check out the MDN guide or read the official standard, RFC 7230. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

• Show HN: Micro HTTP server in 22 lines of C

  It's neat, but I don't believe it is a compliant implementation of HTTP/1.1 (or 1.0). For example, it does not handle percent-encoded characters in the request URI.[1][2] [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7230#section-3.1.1 [2]: https://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.0/spec.html#Request-URI. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

SE Ranking mentions (16)

• Best alternatives to SEMRush?

  Https://raventools.com - used it waaay back, since been acquired by TapClicks -not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing Https://serpstat.com - see this one get mentioned quite a bit; never used tho Https://www.link-assistant.com - has been around for a while Https://seranking.com - has grown beyond just ranking tools Https://cognitiveseo.com - I've heard some decent SEOs rave about this... Source: 12 months ago

• SE Ranking vs Surfer SEO. The best content editor for SEO

  1) SE Ranking is an SEO multi-tool designed for solo webmasters and large marketing agencies. In a nutshell, it analyzes and provides optimization tips on web resources with the goal of increasing their search rankings. A couple of weeks ago, the functions of this platform were expanded to include content analysis. And imho it turned out incredibly well. Source: about 1 year ago

• Considering the best Ahrefs alternatives in 2023

  It’s logical that at this moment the question of alternatives arises and such players as Semrush, SE Ranking, MOZ, Screaming Frog take front position since everyone wants to understand which tool is the best alternative to Ahrefs. I remember the times of Alexa and how the SEO market was divided into "before" and "after". It was a time when a swift decision had to be made, and many of us did so in favor of Ahrefs.... Source: over 1 year ago

• How to audit a website. Fundamentals and explanations

  Let's try to conduct a simple audit of Apple. I will use the SE Ranking website audit tool, but you can use any other platform. Fortunately, the market of SEO tools is very wide. Source: over 1 year ago

• How to hide AI text from search engines. The hypothesis of using multiple SEO tools (Prepostseo and SE ranking)

  3) Rewriting an already edited text using second tools (let's say SE ranking). Source: over 1 year ago