Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

HTTP Toolkit VS Hurl.dev

Compare HTTP Toolkit VS Hurl.dev and see what are their differences

HTTP Toolkit logo HTTP Toolkit

Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.

Hurl.dev logo Hurl.dev

Hurl is a command line tool that runs HTTP requests defined in a simple plain text format.
  • HTTP Toolkit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-01-13
  • Hurl.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09

HTTP Toolkit

$ Details
freemium €7.0 / Monthly (for a Pro subscription)
Platforms
Windows Linux Mac OSX Cross Platform GraphQL API JavaScript Android iOS Docker

HTTP Toolkit videos

HTTP Toolkit Demo

Hurl.dev videos

No Hurl.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to HTTP Toolkit and Hurl.dev)
Developer Tools
79 79%
21% 21
API Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Security
100 100%
0% 0
Proxy
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using HTTP Toolkit and Hurl.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare HTTP Toolkit and Hurl.dev

HTTP Toolkit Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
HTTP ToolKit is an open-source tool for debugging. It works with the three main OS and has good features attached to it. Just with a click, it can intercept and view all your HTTP(s). Compared to others, it targets interception of HTTP and HTTPS automatically from clients, with the inclusion of Android applications and browsers, desktop browsers, backend, and scripting...
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
HTTP Toolkit supports standard HTTP debugger features including breakpoints & rewriting HTTP(S) traffic, filtering and searching collected traffic, and highlighting & autoformatting for many popular request & response body formats. Core features to intercept, inspect & rewrite HTTP(S) are all available for free, while some advanced premium features like import/export and...
Source: geekflare.com
Best Postman Alternatives: Fastest API Testing Tools
For debugging, testing, and building APIs with HTTPs, you can effectively use HTTP Toolkit because it is built for this purpose. Also, this is the reason why it is known as a good Postman alternative for various purposes.
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
On the pricing front, Requestly strikes a balance between affordability and functionality. It is an open-source tool, offering freemium to individual developers and affordable pricing plans for team collaboration. We have also clearly differentiated how Requestly differs from Wireshark and other web debugging tools like Proxyman, Modheader, and HTTP ToolKit separately.
Source: dev.to

Hurl.dev Reviews

We have no reviews of Hurl.dev yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hurl.dev should be more popular than HTTP Toolkit. It has been mentiond 39 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

HTTP Toolkit mentions (24)

View more

Hurl.dev mentions (39)

  • Bruno
    You may be able to replace some of your curl+shell with Hurl — https://hurl.dev/#also-an-http-test-tool . - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Bruno
    I am currently looking for a solution to run automated tests on a sql website generator I am working on ( https://sql.ophir.dev ) I wanted to use hurl (https://hurl.dev/), but Bruno's UI seems to be useful while developing the tests... Has someone tried both ? Which is better for automated testing, including when the response type is html and not json? - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Libcurl
    Shameless promotion: Hurl [1] is an Open Source cli using libcurl to run and tests HTTP requests with plain text! We use libcurl for the super reliability and top features (HTTP/3 for instance) and we've added little features like: - requests chaining, - capturing and passing data from a response to another request, - response tests (JSONPath, XPath, etc...) There is nice syntax sugar for resuesting... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Hoppscotch Desktop Application
    - This too will suffer the same fate as the previous two and will gradually also adopt a busy, unworkable, confusing UI This is why I’ve started using Hurl because that doesn’t even have a UI. Bonus: can be kept in source control and run as part of CI/CD. https://www.communication-generation.com/enshitification/ https://hurl.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Best practices for HarperDB projects using TypeScript
    Testing our application is a matter of running npm run start:dev and making requests to it. To test it better I'll leave a Hurl file in the repository that you can use to test the API. You can run it using hurl --test ./collection.hurl. This will run all the tests and make sure that everything is working as expected. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing HTTP Toolkit and Hurl.dev, you can also consider the following products

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

Insomnia REST - The most intuitive cross-platform REST API Client 😴

Charles Proxy - HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

mitmproxy - mitmproxy is an SSL-capable man-in-the-middle proxy for HTTP.

Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem