Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

HTTP Toolkit VS Control-M for Mainframe

Compare HTTP Toolkit VS Control-M for Mainframe and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

HTTP Toolkit logo HTTP Toolkit

Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.

Control-M for Mainframe logo Control-M for Mainframe

BMC helps customers run and reinvent their businesses with open, scalable, and modular solutions to complex IT problems.
  • HTTP Toolkit
    Image date //
    2024-11-03
  • Control-M for Mainframe Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07

HTTP Toolkit

$ Details
freemium €7.0 / Monthly (for a Pro subscription)
Platforms
Windows Linux Mac OSX Cross Platform GraphQL API JavaScript Android iOS Docker
Startup details
Country
Spain
State
Barcelona
City
Barcelona
Founder(s)
Tim Perry
Employees
1 - 9

HTTP Toolkit features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    HTTP Toolkit provides a user-friendly interface that makes it simple for developers to intercept, view, and debug HTTP traffic without needing extensive setup or configuration.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    HTTP Toolkit is available on multiple platforms (Windows, macOS, and Linux), ensuring a broad usability across different operating systems.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, HTTP Toolkit allows for community contributions and transparency. Developers can inspect, modify, and enhance the tool to better suit their needs.
  • Comprehensive Debugging Features
    It allows for detailed analysis of HTTP requests and responses, including the ability to edit live traffic, simulating various networking conditions, and automatically retrying requests.
  • Integrations and Plugins
    HTTP Toolkit supports a range of common integrations and plugins for popular tools and services, which helps extend its functionality seamlessly.
  • SSL & HTTPS Support
    Has robust support for SSL and HTTPS, allowing for the interception and debugging of secure traffic in a straightforward manner.

Control-M for Mainframe features and specs

  • Comprehensive Job Scheduling
    Control-M for Mainframe offers a versatile and comprehensive job scheduling capability, enabling users to manage and automate complex workflows across various systems and applications, enhancing efficiency.
  • Cross-Platform Integration
    The solution integrates seamlessly with other platforms and applications, facilitating a unified workflow management system that spans multiple environments, which is crucial for enterprises with diverse IT infrastructures.
  • Advanced Automation Features
    Control-M provides advanced automation features that reduce manual intervention, minimize errors, and optimize job processing, which improves overall system performance and reliability.
  • Enhanced Monitoring and Reporting
    The tool offers robust monitoring and reporting capabilities, allowing users to easily track job statuses, receive alerts on failures, and generate reports, which aids in making informed decisions quickly.
  • Scalability
    Control-M is designed to scale according to business needs, accommodating growing workloads and more complex job streams as the organization's requirements evolve.

Possible disadvantages of Control-M for Mainframe

  • Complexity
    The advanced features and extensive capabilities of Control-M can introduce a level of complexity that may require specialized training and a steep learning curve for new users.
  • Cost
    Control-M is a premium tool, and its comprehensive features can come with a high cost, which may be a consideration for smaller organizations with limited budgets.
  • Dependency on Mainframe Expertise
    Operating Control-M on mainframes typically requires specialized knowledge and expertise in mainframe systems, which can be a constraint if such resources are not readily available.
  • Integration Challenges with Legacy Systems
    While Control-M supports integration with various platforms, there may be challenges when integrating with older legacy systems, which might require additional effort and customization.
  • Resource Intensive
    The software can be resource-intensive, requiring adequate system resources for optimal performance, which might necessitate additional investments in hardware or infrastructure upgrades.

Analysis of HTTP Toolkit

Overall verdict

  • HTTP Toolkit is highly regarded in the developer community for its combination of ease of use and advanced debugging capabilities, making it an excellent choice for developers looking to understand and fine-tune their HTTP(S) traffic.

Why this product is good

  • HTTP Toolkit is praised for its user-friendly interface and robust features designed to intercept, view, and debug HTTP(S) traffic. It offers automatic setup for many platforms, which makes it accessible even to those with limited experience in network debugging. Additionally, it supports a wide range of platforms including Windows, macOS, Linux, and Android, making it a versatile tool for developers working on different systems. The tool also provides powerful inspection capabilities, allowing users to explore the full context of each HTTP request or response, including headers, cookies, and bodies.

Recommended for

  • Developers needing to debug and modify HTTP/S requests and responses
  • QA professionals seeking a reliable way to test API interactions
  • Individuals or teams working on full-stack development who need to analyze backend and frontend interactions
  • Students learning about networking who require tools to visualize and understand HTTP(S) traffic

HTTP Toolkit videos

HTTP Toolkit Demo

Control-M for Mainframe videos

No Control-M for Mainframe videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to HTTP Toolkit and Control-M for Mainframe)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
100% 100
Proxy
100 100%
0% 0
Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy

User comments

Share your experience with using HTTP Toolkit and Control-M for Mainframe. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare HTTP Toolkit and Control-M for Mainframe

HTTP Toolkit Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
HTTP ToolKit is an open-source tool for debugging. It works with the three main OS and has good features attached to it. Just with a click, it can intercept and view all your HTTP(s). Compared to others, it targets interception of HTTP and HTTPS automatically from clients, with the inclusion of Android applications and browsers, desktop browsers, backend, and scripting...
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
HTTP Toolkit supports standard HTTP debugger features including breakpoints & rewriting HTTP(S) traffic, filtering and searching collected traffic, and highlighting & autoformatting for many popular request & response body formats. Core features to intercept, inspect & rewrite HTTP(S) are all available for free, while some advanced premium features like import/export and...
Source: geekflare.com
Best Postman Alternatives: Fastest API Testing Tools
For debugging, testing, and building APIs with HTTPs, you can effectively use HTTP Toolkit because it is built for this purpose. Also, this is the reason why it is known as a good Postman alternative for various purposes.
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
On the pricing front, Requestly strikes a balance between affordability and functionality. It is an open-source tool, offering freemium to individual developers and affordable pricing plans for team collaboration. We have also clearly differentiated how Requestly differs from Wireshark and other web debugging tools like Proxyman, Modheader, and HTTP ToolKit separately.
Source: dev.to

Control-M for Mainframe Reviews

We have no reviews of Control-M for Mainframe yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HTTP Toolkit seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

HTTP Toolkit mentions (26)

View more

Control-M for Mainframe mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Control-M for Mainframe yet. Tracking of Control-M for Mainframe recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing HTTP Toolkit and Control-M for Mainframe, you can also consider the following products

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

Charles Proxy - HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy

Google Cloud Load Balancing - Google Cloud Load Balancer enables users to scale their applications on Google Compute Engine.

mitmproxy - mitmproxy is an SSL-capable man-in-the-middle proxy for HTTP.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing - Amazon ELB automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple Amazon EC2 instances in the cloud.