Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

HTTP Ripper VS WebVideoCap

Compare HTTP Ripper VS WebVideoCap and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

HTTP Ripper logo HTTP Ripper

HTTP Ripper is a tool to rip content out of the web. Examples

WebVideoCap logo WebVideoCap

WebVideoCap is a very small program that will let you save the .
  • HTTP Ripper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-29
  • WebVideoCap Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14

HTTP Ripper features and specs

  • Efficient Data Extraction
    HTTP Ripper is designed to efficiently download and extract media content from web pages, which can save time and effort for users needing to collect multimedia data.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    This tool is compatible with multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it accessible to a wide range of users regardless of their preferred platform.
  • Open Source Software
    As an open-source project, users can modify and improve the software to better suit their needs or contribute to its development.

Possible disadvantages of HTTP Ripper

  • Limited Documentation
    The available documentation for HTTP Ripper might not be comprehensive, potentially making it challenging for new users to fully understand and utilize all its features.
  • Outdated Interface
    The user interface may be considered outdated compared to more modern applications, which might affect usability and user experience.
  • Potential Legal Issues
    Using HTTP Ripper to download content might violate the terms of service of some websites, potentially leading to legal issues for users who do not comply with copyright laws.

WebVideoCap features and specs

  • Lightweight
    WebVideoCap is a lightweight utility that does not require heavy resources to run, making it suitable for older and less powerful systems.
  • Portable
    This application is portable, meaning it does not require installation and can be run directly from any folder or removable drive.
  • Simple Interface
    WebVideoCap features a straightforward, easy-to-use interface, which makes it accessible for users with limited technical expertise.
  • Freeware
    The tool is free to use, offering users a cost-effective solution for capturing streaming video content.
  • No Additional Software Needed
    WebVideoCap does not rely on external codecs or additional software to capture video streams, which simplifies the setup process.

Possible disadvantages of WebVideoCap

  • Limited Format Support
    The software may provide limited support for various video formats, which can restrict its usability for capturing streams encoded with the latest codecs.
  • Compatibility Issues
    WebVideoCap may have compatibility problems with modern browsers and streaming technologies, as it hasn't been updated in years.
  • Unix and Mac OS Compatibility
    This tool is designed specifically for Windows, leaving users on other operating systems without a compatible version.
  • Lack of Updates
    The tool has not been updated frequently, which can lead to stability or functionality issues with current online streaming protocols.
  • No Advanced Features
    WebVideoCap lacks advanced features such as editing, scheduling, or batch processing, which may be available in more comprehensive video capturing solutions.
  • Potential Legal and Ethical Issues
    Using WebVideoCap to capture streaming content may violate terms of service for streaming platforms and could infringe on copyright laws.

HTTP Ripper videos

No HTTP Ripper videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

WebVideoCap videos

+ Add

WebVideoCap 1 41 Free

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to HTTP Ripper and WebVideoCap)

HTTP Ripper

WebVideoCap

Download Manager
45 45%
Download Manager
55% 55
Video Downloader
43 43%
Video Downloader
57% 57
Music Downloader
43 43%
Music Downloader
57% 57
YouTube Downloader
42 42%
YouTube Downloader
58% 58

User comments

Share your experience with using HTTP Ripper and WebVideoCap. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, WebVideoCap seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

HTTP Ripper mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of HTTP Ripper yet. Tracking of HTTP Ripper recommendations started around Mar 2021.

WebVideoCap mentions (11)

  • Help with partial internet disconnects
    Get pinginfoview from nirsoft.net and see. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Discussion on Windows 11's Explorer speed
    Go to nirsoft.net and download a utility named ShellExView. It will show all the registered shell extensions and will let you disable them. Under Options you can choose to hide all Microsoft extensions (which I'd recommend to start), and I would uncheck the 'Show 32-bit Shell Extensions' since it restricts it to only the 32-bit ones. Then disable all the 3rd-party extensions and gradually enable them. You're... Source: almost 2 years ago
  • A tip for those having issues with out-of-order photos due to Date Taken
    Some I use to adjust down to the second are BulkFileChanger (nirsoft.net) (often for correcting Video time stamps to align to pictures correct), GeoSetter (more for geotags but also for date corrections), and occasionally EXIF Date Changer (relliksoftware.com). I also use Bulk Rename Utility (TGRMN Software) for renaming files after date-taken correction so that it renames video files in line with photos as File... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Bullshit Has Dominated the Tech Industry
    To mention what good software without bloatware looks like, go checkout https://nirsoft.net website. Small size and absolutely wonderfully working tools made by single dev. Its epitome of craftmanship. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • elevated privileged and remotely accessed
    So a few months back I bought a prepaid altel alcatel. The company that manufactures this phone also owns tsl tv, roku tv, blackberry to name a few. (the chinese government owns majority of these companies, department of defense claims they spy on americans. anyways, that phone I bought suddenly became not mine, it had cellular activity that I never activated, it would randomly display nirsoft.net or... Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing HTTP Ripper and WebVideoCap, you can also consider the following products

aTube Catcher - aTube Catcher also can burn in DVD/VCD your videos without use any other third party software.

Jaksta - Get great Video, Music and Radio downloaders and converters for your Windows PC and Apple Mac. Jaksta recorders are easy to use and fast!

streamWriter - streamWriter records music broadcasted by internet-radiostations. Features:

Replay Media Catcher - Downloads streaming video and audio files from thousands of sites.

Downie - Video download for OS X. Downie supports at this moment over 1,000 different sites.

RTMPExplorer - RTMPExplorer is a GUI for RTMPDump.

Loading...