No Gitless videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Homebrew seems to be a lot more popular than Gitless. While we know about 918 links to Homebrew, we've tracked only 14 mentions of Gitless. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Homebrew is the go to for developer using MacOs to be able to install applications. It's the equivalent of Aptitude in Ubuntu. - Source: dev.to / about 10 hours ago
Install glibc and patchelf using brew (Homebrew), or build from source, or use a prebuilt binary (if available). This guide uses brew. Also you can see this. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
In past personal projects, and in my most recent role, I've used Docker for dependency management to avoid the "works on my machine" scenario. I also just like keeping dependencies off my machine, but for this project I opted not to use containers given my lack of dependencies. I used Homebrew for all my needs :). - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Install Homebrew if it's not already available on your computer. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
# ./launch.sh: #!/bin/bash if ! Command -v brew &> /dev/null; then echo "❌ Homebrew is not installed. Install it from https://brew.sh/" exit 1 fi if ! Command -v docker &> /dev/null; then echo "⚙️ Installing Docker..." brew install --cask docker fi if ! Command -v php &> /dev/null; then echo "🐘 Installing PHP..." brew install php@8.3 fi. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
This is unrelated to the tool called "Gitless": https://gitless.com/. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
One such project is the Gitless initiative which has a Python wrapper around Git proper providing far-simpler workflows based on some solid research. Unfortunately it doesn't look like Gitless' Python codebase has had active development recently, which doesn't inspire much confidence. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
You and me both. Git's interface has been very hard for me to understand (especially coming from Mercurial). I ended up finding Gitless (https://gitless.com), a wrapper around Git with a better interface, and loving it. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
> > To differentiate from Git Pijul should focus on usability... If Pijul has an easy to use interface like Mercurial did then that will massively help adoption. > I don't think the goal or differentiation of pijul is to be popular via good UI, though. If the theory of patches is good, it doesn't matter if pijul "wins" or not, as long as whatever does can integrate it. If the theory of patches is bad, I... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I'd like to think it was my project (https://github.com/martinvonz/jj), but other possibilities include Gitless (https://gitless.com/) or Bazaar (https://bazaar.canonical.com/). - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Chocolatey - The sane way to manage software on Windows.
Pro Git - The Git Book is the official tutorial about Git.
iTerm2 - A terminal emulator for macOS that does amazing things.
Pijul - Pijul is a free and open source distributed version control system based on a sound theory of...
VS Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft
Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.