Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Heroku VS NocoDB

Compare Heroku VS NocoDB and see what are their differences

Umso
The Website Builder for Startups featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Heroku logo Heroku

Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

NocoDB logo NocoDB

The Open Source Airtable alternative
  • Heroku Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05
  • NocoDB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29

Heroku features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Heroku offers an extremely user-friendly interface and a high level of abstraction, making it easy for developers to deploy, manage, and scale applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
  • Quick Deployment
    One of Heroku’s strongest points is the ability to deploy applications quickly using Git. Developers can push their code to Heroku with a simple command, streamlining the entire process.
  • Scalability
    Heroku provides effortless scaling options by allowing developers to add more dynos (containers) with a single command to handle increased traffic and workload.
  • Add-Ons Ecosystem
    Heroku offers a rich ecosystem of add-ons, such as databases, caching, monitoring, and more, which can be easily integrated into applications to extend their functionality.
  • Automatic Updates
    Heroku automatically handles operating system and server updates, allowing developers to focus solely on their application code rather than maintenance tasks.
  • Free Tier
    Heroku offers a free tier with sufficient resources to host small projects and learn the platform without incurring costs, making it accessible for beginners and small-scale applications.

Possible disadvantages of Heroku

  • Cost
    While Heroku offers a free tier, the costs can quickly add up for larger applications and professional use. Paid plans and additional dynos or add-ons can become expensive.
  • Performance
    Heroku’s performance can sometimes be suboptimal compared to other cloud providers, particularly when running high-performance or resource-intensive applications.
  • Limited Control
    Heroku abstracts away a lot of infrastructure management, which can be a downside for developers who need fine-grained control over their environments and configurations.
  • Dyno Sleeping
    Applications running on Heroku’s free tier experience 'dyno sleeping,' where the application goes to sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, causing a delay when it wakes up after receiving a new request.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Relying heavily on Heroku’s ecosystem and platform-specific features can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate to another platform if needed.
  • Add-On Costs
    The costs for add-ons can also become significant, as many useful features and integrations require paid add-ons, increasing the overall expense.

NocoDB features and specs

  • Open Source
    NocoDB is an open-source platform, making it highly customizable and cost-effective for both individual developers and organizations.
  • User Friendly
    The interface is designed to be intuitive and easy to use, lowering the barrier for non-technical users to create and manage databases visually.
  • Integration Capabilities
    NocoDB supports a wide range of integrations with other popular tools and services, enabling seamless workflows and data synchronization.
  • Collaboration
    The platform allows multiple users to collaborate on projects in real time, which is beneficial for team-based projects and remote work setups.
  • Data Security
    Being open source, users can handle their own data security and privacy as per their specific requirements, which can be advantageous over cloud-dependent solutions.
  • Extensible
    Offers an API-first approach, allowing developers to extend its functionalities and integrate it into existing systems easily.

Possible disadvantages of NocoDB

  • Limited Community Support
    As a relatively new player, the community and third-party support may not be as vast and well-established as more mature platforms.
  • Self-Hosting Requirements
    Requires users to manage their own hosting environment, which can be a drawback for those looking for a fully managed service.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic features are user-friendly, utilizing advanced functionalities may require a steeper learning curve, particularly for those unfamiliar with database management.
  • Performance Concerns
    Being dependent on the hosting environment and configurations, performance might not be optimal compared to proprietary SaaS solutions.
  • Scalability Issues
    Scaling the application might require significant technical expertise, particularly in configuring and managing the underlying infrastructure.
  • Inconsistent Updates
    Reliance on community contributions for updates can lead to less predictable release schedules, which might delay access to new features or bug fixes.

Analysis of Heroku

Overall verdict

  • Heroku is a solid choice for developers seeking a straightforward, cloud-based solution for deploying and managing applications. However, it may not be the most cost-effective option for large-scale or data-intensive applications.

Why this product is good

  • Heroku is a popular platform as a service (PaaS) due to its ease of use, fast deployment process, and robust support for multiple programming languages. It allows developers to focus on building applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. Heroku offers scaling capabilities, a wide variety of add-ons, and a strong developer community.

Recommended for

    Heroku is recommended for startups, small to medium-sized applications, hobby projects, and developers who value ease of use and quick deployment cycles. It is particularly suited for those who are developing web applications in languages such as Ruby, Node.js, Python, and others supported by the platform.

Analysis of NocoDB

Overall verdict

  • Yes, NocoDB is a good option for users who want a no-code or low-code solution to manage databases efficiently. It provides a powerful alternative to more complex database management systems, especially for small to medium-sized projects or teams. It's highly regarded for its ease of use, extensive features, and active open-source community.

Why this product is good

  • NocoDB is a feature-rich, open-source platform that allows users to convert their databases into smart spreadsheets. It's an appealing option for those looking to manage databases with a user-friendly interface without deep technical expertise. It supports a wide range of database systems like MySQL, PostgreSQL, and several others. It also offers REST APIs, which make it flexible and extendable for various application needs.

Recommended for

    NocoDB is recommended for small businesses, startups, non-developers, and teams who wish to streamline database management with an easy-to-navigate interface. It's also suitable for developers or organizations looking to integrate no-code solutions into their applications without heavy investment in additional software infrastructure.

Heroku videos

+ Add

What is Heroku | Ask a Dev Episode 14

More videos:

NocoDB videos

No NocoDB videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Heroku and NocoDB)

Heroku

NocoDB

Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Spreadsheets
0 0%
Spreadsheets
100% 100
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
Cloud Hosting
0% 0
No Code
0 0%
No Code
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Heroku and NocoDB. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Heroku and NocoDB

Heroku Reviews

  1. mark-mercer
    Useful Cloud Platform

    Great service to build, run and manage applications entirely in the cloud!

    🏁 Competitors: Amazon AWS, Dokku on Digital Ocean, Firebase
    👍 Pros:    Easy user interface|Good customer service|Multi-language cloud application platform
    👎 Cons:    Limitation with some addons|Low network performance
  2. jamestelford
    · Full Stack Developer at OutDev ·
    🏁 Competitors: Docker, Amazon AWS
    👍 Pros:    Powerful development environments|Great value for the money|Great customer support|Paas
10 Top Firebase Alternatives to Ignite Your Development in 2024
Heroku’s focus on simplicity and developer experience makes it a perfect fit for those who want to focus on building their apps, not babysitting servers. Startups and small businesses, in particular, can benefit from Heroku’s ability to accelerate development and deployment, allowing them to get their ideas to market faster.
Source: genezio.com
2023 Firebase Alternatives: Top 10 Open-Source & Free
Heroku Postgres – Majority of businesses like Heroku because of its SQL database support. Yes, PostgreSQL as a service is an appealing product of this PaaS vendor with quick deployment approaches.
Source: digitalcruch.com
5 Free Heroku Alternatives with Free Plan for Developers
Koyeb is a decent alternative to Heroku that you can consider for hosting or deploying your web apps and APIs. It has all the features of Heroku that you will need for your projects. So far, I have not encountered an importer tool for migrating Heroku deployments but I am sure doing that manually will not be that hard. Just like Heroku it offers you an intuitive web UI as...
Source: www.ilovefreesoftware.com
Choosing the best Next.js hosting platform
However, there are a few disadvantages to Heroku. First of all, despite its build pack, Heroku will run your project as a Node.js application. As a result, you will lose some of Next.js’ most interesting features, such as Incremental Static Regeneration. Analytics are replaced by metrics and measured throughput, response time, and memory usage (only on paid plans).
Source: blog.logrocket.com
Top 10 Netlify Alternatives
Heroku is another alternative to Netlify that doesn’t only host static websites but has the ability to host dynamic websites. This PaaS platform was launched in 2007 and conferred highly scalable features to deploy, host and launch applications.
Source: blog.back4app.com

NocoDB Reviews

We have no reviews of NocoDB yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Heroku should be more popular than NocoDB. It has been mentiond 73 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Heroku mentions (73)

View more

NocoDB mentions (35)

  • Wikipedia and Stack Overflow Search
    Hi, https://mach3db.com is now a frontend to search Wikipedia and Stack Overflow article titles. Right now I only have simple substring search to reduce load on my server. The results are clickable links that point to lightweight versions of Wikipedia and Stack Overflow articles. Please give it a try! It works best in the Vivaldi browser: https://vivaldi.com/ Stack Overflow results can also be filtered by minimum... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • How to Build Internal Tools 100x Faster
    It is possible to speed up the development and delivery process for many internal applications by using no-code or low code tools. These vary in offerings from open source to SaaS, including popular ones like AirTable, BudiBase, Retool, NocoDB and others. These can all greatly help speed up delivery times. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Show HN: Visual DB – Web front end for your database
    How would you describe the differences with https://nocodb.com/ ? - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Getting my feet wet with Kubernetes
    Inside each namespace, there are K8 services pointing to self hosted tools (at this point, I’ve only got NocoDB setup). Each namespace also has a Postgres database. The database is hostpath storage mounted since I am only using single node clusters and also didn’t have time to look too much into “Stateful Sets” and how to correctly host a database within a K8 cluster. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Pocketbase: Open-source back end in 1 file
    It is great to see the number of good opensource projects in this area. Grist and NocoDB deserve mentions, although more targeted towards database management. It is also amazing that they provide so simple ways to get started (single file/electron) - https://github.com/gristlabs. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Heroku and NocoDB, you can also consider the following products

DigitalOcean - Simplifying cloud hosting. Deploy an SSD cloud server in 55 seconds.

Airtable - Airtable works like a spreadsheet but gives you the power of a database to organize anything. Sign up for free.

Linode - We make it simple to develop, deploy, and scale cloud infrastructure at the best price-to-performance ratio in the market.

Baserow - Open source no-code database and Airtable alternative. Create your own online database without technical experience. Performant with high volumes of data, can be self hosted and supports plugins

Amazon AWS - Amazon Web Services offers reliable, scalable, and inexpensive cloud computing services. Free to join, pay only for what you use.

Rows - The spreadsheet where teams work faster

Loading...