Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Heroku VS Browsh

Compare Heroku VS Browsh and see what are their differences

SuperOps
Modern PSA and RMM Software for MSP's and IT Teams featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Heroku logo Heroku

Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

Browsh logo Browsh

A fully-modern text-based browser, rendering to TTY and browsers
  • Heroku Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05
  • Browsh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04

Heroku features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Heroku offers an extremely user-friendly interface and a high level of abstraction, making it easy for developers to deploy, manage, and scale applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
  • Quick Deployment
    One of Heroku’s strongest points is the ability to deploy applications quickly using Git. Developers can push their code to Heroku with a simple command, streamlining the entire process.
  • Scalability
    Heroku provides effortless scaling options by allowing developers to add more dynos (containers) with a single command to handle increased traffic and workload.
  • Add-Ons Ecosystem
    Heroku offers a rich ecosystem of add-ons, such as databases, caching, monitoring, and more, which can be easily integrated into applications to extend their functionality.
  • Automatic Updates
    Heroku automatically handles operating system and server updates, allowing developers to focus solely on their application code rather than maintenance tasks.
  • Free Tier
    Heroku offers a free tier with sufficient resources to host small projects and learn the platform without incurring costs, making it accessible for beginners and small-scale applications.

Possible disadvantages of Heroku

  • Cost
    While Heroku offers a free tier, the costs can quickly add up for larger applications and professional use. Paid plans and additional dynos or add-ons can become expensive.
  • Performance
    Heroku’s performance can sometimes be suboptimal compared to other cloud providers, particularly when running high-performance or resource-intensive applications.
  • Limited Control
    Heroku abstracts away a lot of infrastructure management, which can be a downside for developers who need fine-grained control over their environments and configurations.
  • Dyno Sleeping
    Applications running on Heroku’s free tier experience 'dyno sleeping,' where the application goes to sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, causing a delay when it wakes up after receiving a new request.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Relying heavily on Heroku’s ecosystem and platform-specific features can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate to another platform if needed.
  • Add-On Costs
    The costs for add-ons can also become significant, as many useful features and integrations require paid add-ons, increasing the overall expense.

Browsh features and specs

  • Low Bandwidth Usage
    Browsh uses textual and minimal visual elements by rendering web pages in a text-based browser like Lynx, which reduces the bandwidth requirement significantly.
  • Compatibility with Modern Websites
    Unlike traditional text-based browsers, Browsh can handle modern web technologies like HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, making it more adaptable to contemporary web standards.
  • Remote Access
    Browsh can be used over SSH, allowing users to browse the internet from a remote server, which is beneficial in accessing blocked content or when local internet is slow.
  • System Resources Efficiency
    Browsh primarily operates in a terminal, consuming fewer system resources compared to graphic-intensive web browsers, ideal for users on older hardware.
  • Privacy
    Running Browsh on a remote server can enhance user privacy by hiding the user's IP address and isolating sessions from the local machine.

Possible disadvantages of Browsh

  • Limited Visual Experience
    As Browsh primarily functions in a text-based environment, it lacks the full visual and interactive experience of a fully-featured graphical web browser.
  • Learning Curve
    Users may find navigating and understanding the terminal interface challenging, particularly for those unfamiliar with using command-line tools.
  • JavaScript Limitations
    Even though Browsh supports JavaScript, complex functionalities might not render as effectively as in graphic browsers, potentially impacting interactive web applications.
  • Limited Multimedia Support
    Multimedia content, like videos or animated graphics, may not display perfectly, limiting the user's ability to consume certain types of content.
  • Setup Complexity
    Setting up Browsh to work optimally, especially for remote access scenarios, can be more complex compared to regular web browsers, requiring some technical knowledge.

Analysis of Heroku

Overall verdict

  • Heroku is a solid choice for developers seeking a straightforward, cloud-based solution for deploying and managing applications. However, it may not be the most cost-effective option for large-scale or data-intensive applications.

Why this product is good

  • Heroku is a popular platform as a service (PaaS) due to its ease of use, fast deployment process, and robust support for multiple programming languages. It allows developers to focus on building applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. Heroku offers scaling capabilities, a wide variety of add-ons, and a strong developer community.

Recommended for

    Heroku is recommended for startups, small to medium-sized applications, hobby projects, and developers who value ease of use and quick deployment cycles. It is particularly suited for those who are developing web applications in languages such as Ruby, Node.js, Python, and others supported by the platform.

Heroku videos

+ Add

What is Heroku | Ask a Dev Episode 14

More videos:

Browsh videos

+ Add

Browsh A Text based Browser that is Actually Pretty Good! | Odd Projects #2

More videos:

  • Review - Linux Fails on the Desktop, Plus Arch Malware and the Browsh Browser
  • Review - Linux Terminal Browser [Browsh]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Heroku and Browsh)

Heroku

Browsh

Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Web Browsers
0 0%
Web Browsers
100% 100
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
Cloud Hosting
0% 0
Rental Property Management
0 0%
Rental Property Management
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Heroku and Browsh. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Heroku and Browsh

Heroku Reviews

  1. mark-mercer
    Useful Cloud Platform

    Great service to build, run and manage applications entirely in the cloud!

    🏁 Competitors: Amazon AWS, Dokku on Digital Ocean, Firebase
    👍 Pros:    Easy user interface|Good customer service|Multi-language cloud application platform
    👎 Cons:    Limitation with some addons|Low network performance
  2. jamestelford
    · Full Stack Developer at OutDev ·
    🏁 Competitors: Docker, Amazon AWS
    👍 Pros:    Powerful development environments|Great value for the money|Great customer support|Paas
10 Top Firebase Alternatives to Ignite Your Development in 2024
Heroku’s focus on simplicity and developer experience makes it a perfect fit for those who want to focus on building their apps, not babysitting servers. Startups and small businesses, in particular, can benefit from Heroku’s ability to accelerate development and deployment, allowing them to get their ideas to market faster.
Source: genezio.com
2023 Firebase Alternatives: Top 10 Open-Source & Free
Heroku Postgres – Majority of businesses like Heroku because of its SQL database support. Yes, PostgreSQL as a service is an appealing product of this PaaS vendor with quick deployment approaches.
Source: digitalcruch.com
5 Free Heroku Alternatives with Free Plan for Developers
Koyeb is a decent alternative to Heroku that you can consider for hosting or deploying your web apps and APIs. It has all the features of Heroku that you will need for your projects. So far, I have not encountered an importer tool for migrating Heroku deployments but I am sure doing that manually will not be that hard. Just like Heroku it offers you an intuitive web UI as...
Source: www.ilovefreesoftware.com
Choosing the best Next.js hosting platform
However, there are a few disadvantages to Heroku. First of all, despite its build pack, Heroku will run your project as a Node.js application. As a result, you will lose some of Next.js’ most interesting features, such as Incremental Static Regeneration. Analytics are replaced by metrics and measured throughput, response time, and memory usage (only on paid plans).
Source: blog.logrocket.com
Top 10 Netlify Alternatives
Heroku is another alternative to Netlify that doesn’t only host static websites but has the ability to host dynamic websites. This PaaS platform was launched in 2007 and conferred highly scalable features to deploy, host and launch applications.
Source: blog.back4app.com

Browsh Reviews

We have no reviews of Browsh yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Heroku should be more popular than Browsh. It has been mentiond 73 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Heroku mentions (73)

View more

Browsh mentions (13)

  • This doesn’t sound right. Thoughts?
    Well I do also regularly make use of brow.sh expecially when I hit the slow hours of the internet. I just login to my old ssh sdf.org shell account and away I go. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Who wants to be hired? (November 2022)
    15 years experience. You may have seen my text-based modern browser, https://brow.sh, here on the front page a few times. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Is it still possible to live in a terminal?
    You might be interested in https://brow.sh. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Freelancer? Seeking freelancer? (May 2022)
    Some of you may know me from https://brow.sh `. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • [plugin] browse internet from neovim
    That looks really useful! It would be even nicer to see something like this, but integrated with brow.sh for those who prefer to stay on the terminal. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Heroku and Browsh, you can also consider the following products

DigitalOcean - Simplifying cloud hosting. Deploy an SSD cloud server in 55 seconds.

W3M - w3m is a text-based web browser as well as a pager like ' ...

Linode - We make it simple to develop, deploy, and scale cloud infrastructure at the best price-to-performance ratio in the market.

Links - Links is a graphics and text mode web browser, released under GPL. Links is free software.

Amazon AWS - Amazon Web Services offers reliable, scalable, and inexpensive cloud computing services. Free to join, pay only for what you use.

Lynx.invisible-island.net - Thomas Dickey is the maintainer/developer of the Lynx text-browser. This page gives some background and pointers to Lynx resources.

Loading...