Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Heroku VS ASP.NET MVC

Compare Heroku VS ASP.NET MVC and see what are their differences

InfinyHost
Smart hosting solutions for small businesses, eCommerce, and personal websites. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Heroku logo Heroku

Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

ASP.NET MVC logo ASP.NET MVC

Download ASP.NET MVC and learn how to build web apps using the model view controller pattern.
  • Heroku Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05
  • ASP.NET MVC Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-26

Heroku features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Heroku offers an extremely user-friendly interface and a high level of abstraction, making it easy for developers to deploy, manage, and scale applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
  • Quick Deployment
    One of Heroku’s strongest points is the ability to deploy applications quickly using Git. Developers can push their code to Heroku with a simple command, streamlining the entire process.
  • Scalability
    Heroku provides effortless scaling options by allowing developers to add more dynos (containers) with a single command to handle increased traffic and workload.
  • Add-Ons Ecosystem
    Heroku offers a rich ecosystem of add-ons, such as databases, caching, monitoring, and more, which can be easily integrated into applications to extend their functionality.
  • Automatic Updates
    Heroku automatically handles operating system and server updates, allowing developers to focus solely on their application code rather than maintenance tasks.
  • Free Tier
    Heroku offers a free tier with sufficient resources to host small projects and learn the platform without incurring costs, making it accessible for beginners and small-scale applications.

Possible disadvantages of Heroku

  • Cost
    While Heroku offers a free tier, the costs can quickly add up for larger applications and professional use. Paid plans and additional dynos or add-ons can become expensive.
  • Performance
    Heroku’s performance can sometimes be suboptimal compared to other cloud providers, particularly when running high-performance or resource-intensive applications.
  • Limited Control
    Heroku abstracts away a lot of infrastructure management, which can be a downside for developers who need fine-grained control over their environments and configurations.
  • Dyno Sleeping
    Applications running on Heroku’s free tier experience 'dyno sleeping,' where the application goes to sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, causing a delay when it wakes up after receiving a new request.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Relying heavily on Heroku’s ecosystem and platform-specific features can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate to another platform if needed.
  • Add-On Costs
    The costs for add-ons can also become significant, as many useful features and integrations require paid add-ons, increasing the overall expense.

ASP.NET MVC features and specs

  • Separation of Concerns
    ASP.NET MVC enforces a clear separation between the model, view, and controller components, which helps in managing and structuring code more efficiently.
  • Testability
    The framework is inherently testable due to its separation of concerns and design pattern, facilitating unit testing of both the controllers and business logic.
  • Extensibility
    ASP.NET MVC is highly extensible, allowing developers to customize components like routing, view engines, serialization, and others as per their needs.
  • Powerful Routing
    The framework provides a powerful and flexible URL routing system that makes it easy to create SEO-friendly URLs.
  • Rich Ecosystem
    Developers can leverage the rich .NET ecosystem, utilizing libraries, tools, and third-party extensions that are compatible with ASP.NET.

Possible disadvantages of ASP.NET MVC

  • Complexity for Small Applications
    For smaller applications, the overhead of setting up and maintaining the MVC structure might be more complex than necessary.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    Developers coming from a WebForms background or without MVC experience might find the ASP.NET MVC framework more challenging to learn initially.
  • Lacks Built-in Controls
    Unlike ASP.NET WebForms, ASP.NET MVC does not provide a wide range of built-in server controls, which can increase the time to develop certain UI components.
  • Heavy on Convention
    The framework is built heavily on conventions, which might not appeal to developers who prefer configuration over convention.

Heroku videos

+ Add

What is Heroku | Ask a Dev Episode 14

More videos:

ASP.NET MVC videos

+ Add

Step-by-step ASP.NET MVC Tutorial for Beginners | Mosh

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to ASP.NET MVC in C#: Basics, Advanced Topics, Tips, Tricks, Best Practices, and More

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Heroku and ASP.NET MVC)

Heroku

ASP.NET MVC

Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
Web Frameworks
100% 100
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
Cloud Hosting
0% 0
Developer Tools
95 95%
Developer Tools
5% 5

User comments

Share your experience with using Heroku and ASP.NET MVC. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Heroku and ASP.NET MVC

Heroku Reviews

  1. mark-mercer
    Useful Cloud Platform

    Great service to build, run and manage applications entirely in the cloud!

    🏁 Competitors: Amazon AWS, Dokku on Digital Ocean, Firebase
    👍 Pros:    Easy user interface|Good customer service|Multi-language cloud application platform
    👎 Cons:    Limitation with some addons|Low network performance
  2. jamestelford
    · Full Stack Developer at OutDev ·
    🏁 Competitors: Docker, Amazon AWS
    👍 Pros:    Powerful development environments|Great value for the money|Great customer support|Paas
10 Top Firebase Alternatives to Ignite Your Development in 2024
Heroku’s focus on simplicity and developer experience makes it a perfect fit for those who want to focus on building their apps, not babysitting servers. Startups and small businesses, in particular, can benefit from Heroku’s ability to accelerate development and deployment, allowing them to get their ideas to market faster.
Source: genezio.com
2023 Firebase Alternatives: Top 10 Open-Source & Free
Heroku Postgres – Majority of businesses like Heroku because of its SQL database support. Yes, PostgreSQL as a service is an appealing product of this PaaS vendor with quick deployment approaches.
Source: digitalcruch.com
5 Free Heroku Alternatives with Free Plan for Developers
Koyeb is a decent alternative to Heroku that you can consider for hosting or deploying your web apps and APIs. It has all the features of Heroku that you will need for your projects. So far, I have not encountered an importer tool for migrating Heroku deployments but I am sure doing that manually will not be that hard. Just like Heroku it offers you an intuitive web UI as...
Source: www.ilovefreesoftware.com
Choosing the best Next.js hosting platform
However, there are a few disadvantages to Heroku. First of all, despite its build pack, Heroku will run your project as a Node.js application. As a result, you will lose some of Next.js’ most interesting features, such as Incremental Static Regeneration. Analytics are replaced by metrics and measured throughput, response time, and memory usage (only on paid plans).
Source: blog.logrocket.com
Top 10 Netlify Alternatives
Heroku is another alternative to Netlify that doesn’t only host static websites but has the ability to host dynamic websites. This PaaS platform was launched in 2007 and conferred highly scalable features to deploy, host and launch applications.
Source: blog.back4app.com

ASP.NET MVC Reviews

We have no reviews of ASP.NET MVC yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Heroku seems to be a lot more popular than ASP.NET MVC. While we know about 73 links to Heroku, we've tracked only 2 mentions of ASP.NET MVC. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Heroku mentions (73)

  • How to deploy your web application? 3 different approaches to consider (+1 bonus)
    Providers include Digital Ocean, Heroku or Render for example. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Heroku Reviews Apps prevent delivering bugs on production
    Review Apps run the code in any GitHub PR in a complete, disposable Heroku application. Review Apps each have a unique URL you can share. It’s then super easy for anyone to try the new code. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • How to keep an HTTP connection alive for 9 hours
    The app is deployed to Heroku and when it came time to switch the mode to email-on-account-creation mode, it was a very simple environment change:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • How to Process Scheduled Queue Jobs in Node.js with BullMQ and Redis on Heroku
    Heroku is a cloud platform that makes it easy to deploy and scale web applications. It provides a number of features that make it ideal for deploying background job applications, including:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • I made a Bot.. How do I use it?
    Once you've created it you can host it locally (this means leaving the program running on your computer) or host it through a service online. I haven't personally tried this yet, but I believe you can use a site like heroku.com or other similar services. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

ASP.NET MVC mentions (2)

  • ELI5: .NET ecosystem & equivalents
    IMO, .NET's strength is Web API. If you're wanting to build user interfaces, go with Next, Nuxt or Sveltekit. If you want to build user interfaces with .NET, go with ASP.NET MVC. Source: about 2 years ago
  • OWASP Top Ten and Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
    After processing the entries, the analyzer concludes that they are all related to various versions of a product with the name "asp.net_model_view_controller" released by a company called Microsoft. All these entries correspond to a vulnerability with the CVE-2014-4075 identifier. However, the library in which the vulnerability was discovered is called "System.Web.Mvc". Most likely we'll get this name from the list... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Heroku and ASP.NET MVC, you can also consider the following products

DigitalOcean - Simplifying cloud hosting. Deploy an SSD cloud server in 55 seconds.

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

Linode - We make it simple to develop, deploy, and scale cloud infrastructure at the best price-to-performance ratio in the market.

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

Amazon AWS - Amazon Web Services offers reliable, scalable, and inexpensive cloud computing services. Free to join, pay only for what you use.

CodeIgniter - A Fully Baked PHP Framework

Loading...