Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

helidon VS Apache Kafka

Compare helidon VS Apache Kafka and see what are their differences

Promptaa
Prompt organization and AI enhancement. Engineer prompts with 1 click. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

helidon logo helidon

Helidon Project, Java libraries crafted for Microservices

Apache Kafka logo Apache Kafka

Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.
  • helidon Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-28
  • Apache Kafka Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-01

helidon features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Helidon is designed to be a lightweight framework, which makes it an excellent choice for microservices and applications where performance and resource utilization are critical.
  • Microservices Focus
    Helidon is crafted with microservices architecture in mind, offering features and support that align well with cloud-native development strategies.
  • Helidon SE and MP Options
    Helidon provides both Helidon SE (simple, functional style development) and Helidon MP (MicroProfile standard), giving developers the flexibility to choose the programming model that best fits their needs.
  • GraalVM Support
    Helidon has support for GraalVM native image, which can significantly reduce startup time and memory usage, benefiting deployment and execution in cloud environments.
  • Reactive Programming
    With Helidon SE, developers can easily create reactive applications using a non-blocking, asynchronous programming model.

Possible disadvantages of helidon

  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more established frameworks like Spring or Quarkus, Helidon's ecosystem of extensions, plugins, and third-party integrations is less extensive.
  • Smaller Community
    Helidon's community is not as large as some other Java microservices frameworks, which may mean fewer resources or community-driven support options are available.
  • Lack of Built-In Features
    While being lightweight is a benefit, it also means that Helidon might lack more comprehensive, built-in features that are found in larger frameworks, potentially requiring additional effort to implement common capabilities.
  • Newer in the Market
    Being a relatively newer framework, Helidon might not have as proven a track record or the same level of maturity and stability as older frameworks.

Apache Kafka features and specs

  • High Throughput
    Kafka is capable of handling thousands of messages per second due to its distributed architecture, making it suitable for applications that require high throughput.
  • Scalability
    Kafka can easily scale horizontally by adding more brokers to a cluster, making it highly scalable to serve increased loads.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Kafka has built-in replication, ensuring that data is replicated across multiple brokers, providing fault tolerance and high availability.
  • Durability
    Kafka ensures data durability by writing data to disk, which can be replicated to other nodes, ensuring data is not lost even if a broker fails.
  • Real-time Processing
    Kafka supports real-time data streaming, enabling applications to process and react to data as it arrives.
  • Decoupling of Systems
    Kafka acts as a buffer and decouples the production and consumption of messages, allowing independent scaling and management of producers and consumers.
  • Wide Ecosystem
    The Kafka ecosystem includes various tools and connectors such as Kafka Streams, Kafka Connect, and KSQL, which enrich the functionality of Kafka.
  • Strong Community Support
    Kafka has strong community support and extensive documentation, making it easier for developers to find help and resources.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Kafka

  • Complex Setup and Management
    Kafka's distributed nature can make initial setup and ongoing management complex, requiring expert knowledge and significant administrative effort.
  • Operational Overhead
    Running Kafka clusters involves additional operational overhead, including hardware provisioning, monitoring, tuning, and scaling.
  • Latency Sensitivity
    Despite its high throughput, Kafka may experience increased latency in certain scenarios, especially when configured for high durability and consistency.
  • Learning Curve
    The concepts and architecture of Kafka can be difficult for new users to grasp, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Hardware Intensive
    Kafka's performance characteristics often require dedicated and powerful hardware, which can be costly to procure and maintain.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing Kafka's dependencies and ensuring compatibility between versions of Kafka, Zookeeper, and other ecosystem tools can be challenging.
  • Limited Support for Small Messages
    Kafka is optimized for large throughput and can be inefficient for applications that require handling a lot of small messages, where overhead can become significant.
  • Operational Complexity for Small Teams
    Smaller teams might find the operational complexity and maintenance burden of Kafka difficult to manage without a dedicated operations or DevOps team.

helidon videos

+ Add

From Zero to Hello - Helidon MP / MicroProfile

More videos:

  • Review - Everything you must know about Helidon | MicroStream Hackathon Weekly Q&A | Edition 4

Apache Kafka videos

+ Add

Apache Kafka Tutorial | What is Apache Kafka? | Kafka Tutorial for Beginners | Edureka

More videos:

  • Review - Apache Kafka - Getting Started - Kafka Multi-node Cluster - Review Properties
  • Review - 4. Apache Kafka Fundamentals | Confluent Fundamentals for Apache Kafka®
  • Review - Apache Kafka in 6 minutes
  • Review - Apache Kafka Explained (Comprehensive Overview)
  • Review - 2. Motivations and Customer Use Cases | Apache Kafka Fundamentals

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to helidon and Apache Kafka)

helidon

Apache Kafka

Web Frameworks
100 100%
Web Frameworks
0% 0
Stream Processing
0 0%
Stream Processing
100% 100
PHP MVC Framework
100 100%
PHP MVC Framework
0% 0
Data Integration
0 0%
Data Integration
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using helidon and Apache Kafka. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare helidon and Apache Kafka

helidon Reviews

We have no reviews of helidon yet.
Be the first one to post

Apache Kafka Reviews

Best ETL Tools: A Curated List
Debezium is an open-source Change Data Capture (CDC) tool that originated from RedHat. It leverages Apache Kafka and Kafka Connect to enable real-time data replication from databases. Debezium was partly inspired by Martin Kleppmann’s "Turning the Database Inside Out" concept, which emphasized the power of the CDC for modern data pipelines.
Source: estuary.dev
Best message queue for cloud-native apps
If you take the time to sort out the history of message queues, you will find a very interesting phenomenon. Most of the currently popular message queues were born around 2010. For example, Apache Kafka was born at LinkedIn in 2010, Derek Collison developed Nats in 2010, and Apache Pulsar was born at Yahoo in 2012. What is the reason for this?
Source: docs.vanus.ai
Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
Apache Kafka is a highly scalable and robust messaging queue system designed by LinkedIn and donated to the Apache Software Foundation. It's ideal for real-time data streaming and processing, providing high throughput for publishing and subscribing to records or messages. Kafka is typically used in scenarios that require real-time analytics and monitoring, IoT applications,...
Source: blog.iron.io
10 Best Open Source ETL Tools for Data Integration
It is difficult to anticipate the exact demand for open-source tools in 2023 because it depends on various factors and emerging trends. However, open-source solutions such as Kubernetes for container orchestration, TensorFlow for machine learning, Apache Kafka for real-time data streaming, and Prometheus for monitoring and observability are expected to grow in prominence in...
Source: testsigma.com
11 Best FREE Open-Source ETL Tools in 2024
Apache Kafka is an Open-Source Data Streaming Tool written in Scala and Java. It publishes and subscribes to a stream of records in a fault-tolerant manner and provides a unified, high-throughput, and low-latency platform to manage data.
Source: hevodata.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Kafka seems to be a lot more popular than helidon. While we know about 144 links to Apache Kafka, we've tracked only 14 mentions of helidon. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

helidon mentions (14)

  • Year After Switching from Java to Go: Our Experiences
    But Javas has so many of these web frameworks?! * Spring (https://spring.io/) * Spring Boot (https://spring.io/projects/spring-boot) * Helidon (https://helidon.io/) * Micronaut (https://micronaut.io/) * Quarkus (https://quarkus.io/) * JHipster (https://www.jhipster.tech/) * Vaadin (https://vaadin.com/) That's just to mention the bigger ones, there's lots of mini frameworks like Javalin (https://javalin.io/) and... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Java web framework wihout annotations ?
    Maybe take a look at Helidon SE from Oracl (you find a short tutorial at https://www.baeldung.com/microservices-oracle-helidon). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Javalin v5 has been released! (web micro-framework)
    If you’ve used NodeJS & ExpessJS, in Java world, Vert.x, Helidon and Javalin should be familiar. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Is it worth to learn Spring Boot ?
    If you’ve used ExpressJS, you could try Vert.x and Helidon. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Average Oracle move
    You would think that if the site of one of the biggest programming languages is an abomination for both consumers and developers, then the one for a rest framework that the same company develops on the side should be even worse, but that's not the case as we are talking about oracle. How is the helidon website absolutely stunning on both mobile and desktop? It's still developed by oracle, just how is it possible... Source: about 3 years ago
View more

Apache Kafka mentions (144)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing helidon and Apache Kafka, you can also consider the following products

Micronaut Framework - Build modular easily testable microservice & serverless apps

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

vert.x - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

StatCounter - StatCounter is a simple but powerful real-time web analytics service that helps you track, analyse and understand your visitors so you can make good decisions to become more successful online.

Javalin - Simple REST APIs for Java and Kotlin

Histats - Start tracking your visitors in 1 minute!

Loading...