Software Alternatives & Reviews

Harp VS Opa

Compare Harp VS Opa and see what are their differences

Harp logo Harp

The static web server with built-in preprocessing.

Opa logo Opa

Opa is an open source, simple and unified platform for writing web applications.
  • Harp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-10
  • Opa Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16

Harp videos

Harp Review - 10 harps from 50$ to 15.000$ - comparison guide

More videos:

  • Review - Westside Discs Harp Review and Giveaway! | Danny Lindahl
  • Review - Dusty Strings Harp Review

Opa videos

My food review at Opa of Greece!

More videos:

  • Review - Classic Game Room - OPA OPA review for Sega Mark III

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Harp and Opa)
Javascript UI Libraries
57 57%
43% 43
Web Frameworks
0 0%
100% 100
CMS
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Harp and Opa. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Opa should be more popular than Harp. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Harp mentions (1)

  • Is there a technology for reusing HTML components?
    Sounds like what you want is a static site generator. I've used Harp for a long time but I'm not sure it's really maintained these days, so you might also look at 11ty. Source: over 1 year ago

Opa mentions (3)

  • Imba – The friendly full-stack language
    I remember Opa http://opalang.org/ tried something similar at the time when MongoDB was new and modern. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Ask HN: What web frameworks/technologies did not succeed as per your expectation
    We come across some web frameworks and technologies that we think will succeed, but they wither away as time passes by and don't succeed to the level we expected. Which web frameworks and or technologies did you come across that you thought would succeed but did not as per your expectations? For example, I thought that Opa Lang[0] and UrWeb[1] would succeed but did not, even though the ideas were sound. [0]... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Modern JavaScript:Everything you missed over the last 10 years(ECMAScript 2020)
    I think the Opa language was doing JSX-like code in the frontend before JSX http://opalang.org/ Both Opa and JSX were created in 2011. Opa had other innovations as well, such having the same code base run on both client and server (like Next.js). Unfortunately it didn't get traction and was abandoned by the creators. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Harp and Opa, you can also consider the following products

AngularJS - AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Metalsmith - An extremely simple, pluggable static site generator.

ember.js - A JavaScript framework for creating ambitious web apps