Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Haraka VS MailerQ

Compare Haraka VS MailerQ and see what are their differences

Haraka logo Haraka

Open source SMTP server written in Node.js

MailerQ logo MailerQ

MailerQ is a high performance Mail Transfer Agent (MTA) designed for delivering large volume email messages at very high speeds.
  • Haraka Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-25
  • MailerQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-25

Haraka videos

Hi-Tec Haraka Trail Review

More videos:

  • Review - Haraka iPhone Gameplay Review - AppSpy.com
  • Review - Puma Complete Haraka XC Running Shoe | Daisi Jo Reviews

MailerQ videos

No MailerQ videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Haraka and MailerQ)
Email
42 42%
58% 58
SMTP Server
40 40%
60% 60
Self-hosted Email
100 100%
0% 0
MTA
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Haraka and MailerQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Haraka seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Haraka mentions (9)

  • How do you handle SMTP and service emails?
    The next time this happens I'll move to a self hosted solution, like haraka or anonaddy. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Quest for the simple SMTP Server
    Haraka Like: Simple to hook into the processing pipeline Dislike: Node.js and had some issues with stability when I last tried it. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Mailserver
    For the record, I'm using dovecot (https://www.dovecot.org/) for IMAP and Haraka (https://haraka.github.io/) for SMTP. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Is a 'dumb' self-hosted email server possible.
    Haraka (https://haraka.github.io/) is a plugin-based mailserver written in JavaScript. I've messed with postfix before but found Haraka easier because instead of arcane configuration files I can just read, copy, and tweak a plugin to suit my needs. Policies for receiving, storing, forwarding, and ignoring mail can be arbitrarily complex. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How to Monitor Exchange and Office 365 Mail Queues
    Exoprise leverages a node-based SMTP application, haraka, to process its messages as a well as series of custom plugins. You can read more about haraka here. Since its node-based its event driven, incredibly fast, and highly scable. Our auto-responders process 100’s of thousands of inbound and outbound messages each day, typically in < 10 milliseconds per each message. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

MailerQ mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MailerQ yet. Tracking of MailerQ recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Haraka and MailerQ, you can also consider the following products

Mail-in-a-box - Mail-in-a-Box provides webmail and an IMAP/SMTP server for use with mobile devices and desktop mail software and also includes contacts and calendar synchronization.

Postfix - Postfix is a mail transfer agent (MTA) that routes and delivers electronic mail.

PowerMTA - PowerMTA is an industrial-strength software for high-volume email delivery.

mailcow - An open source mailserver suite.

EmailSuccess - EmailSuccess is an advanced MTA built to handle the most critical reliability, performance, security, and deliverability requirements.

Zimbra - Zimbra is trusted by over 500 million users to increase productivity with a complete set of collaboration tools while maintaining total control over security and privacy.