Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Haproxy VS GraphQL Cache

Compare Haproxy VS GraphQL Cache and see what are their differences

Hive
Seamless project management and collaboration for your team. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Haproxy logo Haproxy

Reliable, High Performance TCP/HTTP Load Balancer

GraphQL Cache logo GraphQL Cache

GraphQL provides a complete description of the data in your API, gives clients the power to ask for exactly what they need and nothing more, makes it easier to evolve APIs over time, and enables powerful developer tools.
  • Haproxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-19
  • GraphQL Cache Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29

Haproxy features and specs

  • High Performance
    HAProxy is known for its high efficiency and low latency, making it suitable for handling a large amount of traffic with minimal overhead.
  • Reliability
    The software is robust and stable, having been battle-tested in numerous large-scale environments, ensuring reliable performance under heavy loads.
  • Flexibility
    HAProxy supports a wide range of configurations, allowing it to be used in various scenarios, from simple load balancing to complex traffic routing.
  • Scalability
    With HAProxy, you can easily scale out your infrastructure by distributing the traffic across multiple servers, ensuring better resource utilization.
  • Health Checking
    HAProxy provides powerful health check mechanisms to monitor the status of backend servers and automatically remove unhealthy servers from the pool.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, HAProxy is free to use and has a community of contributors that help improve and maintain the software continuously.
  • SSL Termination
    HAProxy supports SSL termination, which can offload the SSL decryption process from backend servers, improving overall performance.
  • Logging and Monitoring
    HAProxy offers comprehensive logging and monitoring features that allow administrators to gain insights into traffic patterns and server health.

Possible disadvantages of Haproxy

  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up HAProxy can be complex and may require a deep understanding of its configuration syntax and options, particularly for advanced use cases.
  • Lack of Built-in GUI
    HAProxy does not come with a built-in graphical user interface (GUI), which can make management more difficult for users who prefer visual tools over command-line interfaces.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    For beginners, the learning curve can be steep due to the advanced features and extensive configuration options provided by HAProxy.
  • Limited Application Layer Features
    While HAProxy excels at load balancing and basic traffic management, it lacks some application layer features that specialized application delivery controllers (ADCs) might offer.
  • Resource Intensive
    In certain high-traffic scenarios, HAProxy may consume significant CPU and memory resources, potentially requiring hardware upgrades.

GraphQL Cache features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Haproxy videos

+ Add

HAProxy Crash Course (TLS 1.3, HTTPS, HTTP/2 and more)

More videos:

  • Review - HAPROXY vs NGINX - 10,000 requests while killing servers
  • Tutorial - How To Setup ACME, Let's Encrypt, and HAProxy HTTPS offloading on pfsense

GraphQL Cache videos

No GraphQL Cache videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Haproxy and GraphQL Cache)

Haproxy

GraphQL Cache

Web Servers
100 100%
Web Servers
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
Databases
100% 100
Web And Application Servers
100 100%
Web And Application Servers
0% 0
NoSQL Databases
0 0%
NoSQL Databases
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Haproxy and GraphQL Cache. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Haproxy and GraphQL Cache

Haproxy Reviews

Top 5 Open Source Load Balancers in 2024
Widely regarded as a stalwart in the open source community, HAProxy has evolved into a versatile and powerful load balancing solution. HAProxy stands as a silent sentinel, orchestrating the seamless flow of data for some of the world's most visited websites. As a free, exceptionally fast, and reliable reverse-proxy, HAProxy is not just a load balancer; it's a digital maestro...
Source: www.techtimes.com
10 Awesome Open Source Load Balancers
HAProxy is an L4 and L7 load balancer supporting TCP and UDP traffic. It’s a well-established, open source solution used by companies such as Airbnb and GitHub. HAProxy is also a very capable L7 load balancer, supporting HTTP/2 and gRPC backends. Thanks to its long history, large community, and reliable nature, HAProxy has become the de facto open source load balancer—it...
Source: www.containiq.com
10 Open Source Load Balancer for HA and Improved Performance
One of the popular ones out there in the market is to provide high availability, proxy, TCP/HTTP load-balancing. HAProxy is used by some of the reputed brands in the world, like below.
Source: geekflare.com
Top 5 Open-Source Load Balancers 2021
HAProxy provides many distinct features such as it processes an enormous number of tasks in a millisecond, offers minimal cost for context switch and memory usage, ability to instantly detect a threat or event on tens of thousands of connections, efficient use of the CPU cycles, and memory bandwidth, optimized timer queue, optimized HTTP header analysis, GZip Compression,...
Source: linuxways.net
The 5 Best Open Source Load Balancers
HAProxy is another common name in the web ecosystem. HAProxy offers reverse proxying and load balancing of TCP and HTTP traffic. When you choose HAProxy, you’re choosing a high-performance, well-established solution.
Source: logz.io

GraphQL Cache Reviews

We have no reviews of GraphQL Cache yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GraphQL Cache should be more popular than Haproxy. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Haproxy mentions (2)

  • HA Proxy For MySQL Master – Slave
    Root@haproxy01:~# haproxy -v HA-Proxy version 2.0.13-2ubuntu0.3 2021/08/27 - https://haproxy.org/ How to Install it? You simply use yum or apt commands to install it Sudo apt install -y haproxy. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • cannot get haproxy / mjpeg streamer to play nice together
    HA-Proxy version 2.2.9-2+deb11u3 2022/03/10 - https://haproxy.org/ maxconn 4096 user haproxy group haproxy daemon log 127.0.0.1 local0 debug Defaults log global mode http option httplog option dontlognull retries 3 option redispatch option http-server-close option forwardfor maxconn 2000 ... Source: almost 3 years ago

GraphQL Cache mentions (4)

  • What are the Differences between GQL and REST?
    'id' data type and field to help support caching: https://graphql.org/learn/caching/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • GraphQL Is a Trap?
    > Take a look at this. I repeat: client-side caching is not a problem, even with GraphQL. The technical problems regarding GraphQL's blockers to caching lies in server-side caching. For server-side caching, the only answer that GraphQL offers is to use primary keys, hand-wave a lot, and hope that your GraphQL implementation did some sort of optimization to handle that corner case by caching results. Don't take my... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • GraphQL Is a Trap?
    > Checkout Relay.js: https://relay.dev/ Relay is a GraphQL client. That's the irrelevant side of caching, because that can be trivially implemented by an intern, specially given GraphQL's official copout of caching based on primary keys [1], and doesn't have any meaningful impact on the client's resources. The relevant side of caching is server-side caching: the bits of your system that allow it to fulfill... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Designing a URL-based query syntax for GraphQL
    This is clever! Can anyone help me understand how this lines up with the original value proposition of GraphQL? I was under the impression that the Big Idea behind GraphQL was, amongst other things, client-side caching[1]. I’m probably missing some nuance here, so bear with me: if your GraphQL client is caching properly, then what would this syntax give a developer that a URL query parameter parser couldn’t? [1]... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Haproxy and GraphQL Cache, you can also consider the following products

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

Ehcache - Java's most widely used cache.

Traefik - Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy

Apache Ignite - high-performance, integrated and distributed in-memory platform for computing and transacting on...

SKUDONET - Scale easy and avoid system disruptions with the ADC challengers through high availability, load balancing, security and high performance.

Hazelcast - Clustering and highly scalable data distribution platform for Java

Loading...