Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Ignite VS GraphQL Cache

Compare Apache Ignite VS GraphQL Cache and see what are their differences

Apache Ignite logo Apache Ignite

high-performance, integrated and distributed in-memory platform for computing and transacting on...

GraphQL Cache logo GraphQL Cache

GraphQL provides a complete description of the data in your API, gives clients the power to ask for exactly what they need and nothing more, makes it easier to evolve APIs over time, and enables powerful developer tools.
  • Apache Ignite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-08
  • GraphQL Cache Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29

Apache Ignite features and specs

  • In-Memory Data Grid
    Apache Ignite provides a robust in-memory data grid that can drastically improve data access speeds by storing data in memory across distributed nodes.
  • Scalability
    The system is designed to scale horizontally, allowing users to add more nodes to handle increased loads, thereby ensuring high availability and performance.
  • Distributed Compute Capabilities
    Ignite supports parallel execution of tasks across cluster nodes, which is beneficial for complex computations and real-time processing.
  • Persistence
    Although primarily in-memory, Ignite offers a durable and transactional Persistence layer that ensures data can be persisted on disk, providing a hybrid in-memory and persistent storage solution.
  • SQL Queries
    Ignite offers support for ANSI-99 SQL, which allows users to execute complex SQL queries across distributed datasets easily.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with existing Hadoop and Spark setups, allowing users to enhance their existing data pipelines with Ignite’s capabilities.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Apache Ignite includes built-in mechanisms for recovery and ensures that data copies are maintained across nodes for resilience against node failures.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Ignite

  • Complexity
    Apache Ignite can be complex to set up and manage, especially when configuring a large, distributed system with multiple nodes.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running an in-memory data grid like Ignite requires significant memory resources, which can increase operational costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive features and distributed nature, there is a steep learning curve associated with effectively utilizing Ignite.
  • Configuration Overhead
    There is substantial configuration overhead involved to optimize performance and ensure proper cluster management.
  • Community Support
    Although it has active development, the community support might not be as robust compared to other more mature solutions, possibly leading to challenges in finding solutions to niche issues.
  • YARN Dependence
    For those looking to integrate with Hadoop, Ignite's optimal performance is sometimes reliant on Hadoop YARN, which can introduce additional complexity.

GraphQL Cache features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Apache Ignite videos

Best Practices for a Microservices Architecture on Apache Ignite

More videos:

  • Review - Apache Ignite + GridGain powering up banks and financial institutions with distributed systems

GraphQL Cache videos

No GraphQL Cache videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Ignite and GraphQL Cache)
Databases
87 87%
13% 13
NoSQL Databases
85 85%
15% 15
Key-Value Database
82 82%
18% 18
Relational Databases
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Ignite and GraphQL Cache. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

GraphQL Cache might be a bit more popular than Apache Ignite. We know about 4 links to it since March 2021 and only 3 links to Apache Ignite. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Ignite mentions (3)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Ignite — Free and open-source, Apache Ignite is a horizontally scalable key-value cache store system with a robust multi-model database that powers APIs to compute distributed data. Ignite provides a security system that can authenticate users' credentials on the server. It can also be used for system workload acceleration, real-time data processing, analytics, and as a graph-centric programming model. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Ask HN: P2P Databases?
    Ignite works as you describe: https://ignite.apache.org/ I wouldn't really recommend this approach, I would think more in terms of subscriptions and topics and less of a 'database'. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • .NET and Apache Ignite: Testing Cache and SQL API features — Part I
    Last days, I started using Apache Ignite as a cache strategy for some applications. Apache Ignite is an open-source In-Memory Data Grid, distributed database, caching, and high-performance computing platform. Source: over 3 years ago

GraphQL Cache mentions (4)

  • What are the Differences between GQL and REST?
    'id' data type and field to help support caching: https://graphql.org/learn/caching/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • GraphQL Is a Trap?
    > Take a look at this. I repeat: client-side caching is not a problem, even with GraphQL. The technical problems regarding GraphQL's blockers to caching lies in server-side caching. For server-side caching, the only answer that GraphQL offers is to use primary keys, hand-wave a lot, and hope that your GraphQL implementation did some sort of optimization to handle that corner case by caching results. Don't take my... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • GraphQL Is a Trap?
    > Checkout Relay.js: https://relay.dev/ Relay is a GraphQL client. That's the irrelevant side of caching, because that can be trivially implemented by an intern, specially given GraphQL's official copout of caching based on primary keys [1], and doesn't have any meaningful impact on the client's resources. The relevant side of caching is server-side caching: the bits of your system that allow it to fulfill... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Designing a URL-based query syntax for GraphQL
    This is clever! Can anyone help me understand how this lines up with the original value proposition of GraphQL? I was under the impression that the Big Idea behind GraphQL was, amongst other things, client-side caching[1]. I’m probably missing some nuance here, so bear with me: if your GraphQL client is caching properly, then what would this syntax give a developer that a URL query parameter parser couldn’t? [1]... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Ignite and GraphQL Cache, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Ehcache - Java's most widely used cache.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Hazelcast - Clustering and highly scalable data distribution platform for Java

memcached - High-performance, distributed memory object caching system

WunderGraph - Save 2-4 weeks / 90% of the code building web apps by automating API integrations and security.