Table of contents
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if GraphQL Cache is good.
Check the traffic stats of GraphQL Cache on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of GraphQL Cache on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of GraphQL Cache's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of GraphQL Cache on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about GraphQL Cache on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
'id' data type and field to help support caching: https://graphql.org/learn/caching/. Source: over 3 years ago
> Take a look at this. I repeat: client-side caching is not a problem, even with GraphQL. The technical problems regarding GraphQL's blockers to caching lies in server-side caching. For server-side caching, the only answer that GraphQL offers is to use primary keys, hand-wave a lot, and hope that your GraphQL implementation did some sort of optimization to handle that corner case by caching results. Don't take my... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
> Checkout Relay.js: https://relay.dev/ Relay is a GraphQL client. That's the irrelevant side of caching, because that can be trivially implemented by an intern, specially given GraphQL's official copout of caching based on primary keys [1], and doesn't have any meaningful impact on the client's resources. The relevant side of caching is server-side caching: the bits of your system that allow it to fulfill... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
This is clever! Can anyone help me understand how this lines up with the original value proposition of GraphQL? I was under the impression that the Big Idea behind GraphQL was, amongst other things, client-side caching[1]. I’m probably missing some nuance here, so bear with me: if your GraphQL client is caching properly, then what would this syntax give a developer that a URL query parameter parser couldn’t? [1]... - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
Do you know an article comparing GraphQL Cache to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is GraphQL Cache good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss GraphQL Cache here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
