Haml might be a bit more popular than Skulpt. We know about 17 links to it since March 2021 and only 15 links to Skulpt. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
First of all, I like Slim. I like the beauty and cleanness of Slim templates, to me they are way more readable than regular ERB templates and I think they fit in the ruby/Rails ecosystem very well. Slim is a close cousin to Haml, without the ugly percent characters, haha. I've used Slim exclusively in my projects since about 2016. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
> I can't say what problem it is supposed to solve "Haml accelerates and simplifies template creation" https://haml.info/ If you'd rather write raw HTML, keeping track of closing tags etc, then don't use HAML. No need to bash it because you personally feel it is ugly or unnecessary. FWIW I personally feel the exact opposite. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
There is a better side by side of the syntax here https://haml.info (i've been using haml for 17 years lol, I find it more enjoyable to read and write). - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Personally, I'd recommend Maud if you don't need something with runtime reloading. Not only is it much faster, it implements a template language that is effectively the Rust-syntax equivalent to Slim or Haml using a procedural macro, so you get compile-time verification that your HTML output is well-formed. Source: about 1 year ago
Does this support HAML-style syntax? We're 100% HAML-only for templating, whether normal Rails views or ViewComponent... https://github.com/haml/haml so going back to writing HTML or ERB feels like a huge downgrade. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
As for python being supported in the browser, I think you're looking for something like https://skulpt.org/. I haven't used it though, but you'll need to learn how to use libraries first. Source: 11 months ago
It's a simple editor, but looks like it would be good for beginners and should work on Chromebooks and mobile devices. It appears to be a React single page app that uses Skulpt behind the scenes. Source: 12 months ago
We ended Part 2 by asking the questions: once we've created an object x, how and why does its 'lifetime' end? In this article, we'll learn the answers by exploring how CPython frees objects from memory. CPython isn't the only implementation of Python - for example, there's Skulpt, which Anvil uses to run Python in the browser - but it's the one we'll focus on specifically for this article. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
I currently use Skulpt for in-browser Python tutorials, how does this compare to that? Source: almost 2 years ago
It's great to see more options for Python in the browser but the ecosystem has existed for a while. If anyone is interested, there are some cool Python-in-the-browser implementations like Brython and Skulpt that are worth checking out. Source: about 2 years ago
Handlebars - Handlebars is a JavaScript template library that is, more or less, based on ...
Brython - Brython's goal is to replace Javascript with Python, as the scripting language for web browsers.
Jinja2 - Jinja2 is a template engine written in Python.
Transcrypt - Transcrypt is a Python to JavaScript transpiler.
Pug - Pug is a robust, elegant, feature rich template engine for Node.js
JavaScript - Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions