No Hakyll videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Semantic UI should be more popular than Hakyll. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Others have mentioned static site generators. I like Hakyll [1] because it can tightly integrate with Pandoc [2] and allows you to develop custom solutions if your needs ever grow. [1]: https://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/ [2]: https://pandoc.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Honestly, I've had a great experience with Hakyll for static site generation. There's a bit of a learning curve to effectively use the library/framework, but in my opinion the learning curve is much lower than Yesod/Fay. If all you need is to build static website pages, I'd suggest Hakyll. Source: about 2 years ago
Love SSGs too! Came here to share praise for Hakyll[1], for people with an FP leaning. Predictably, it's not easy to get started, but once you're into it the power of building your own arbitrary content "compilers" (and template extensions etc etc) is pretty impressive. [1] https://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Hi there. A friend of mine wanted to publish a blog/site at both French and English. I told him about static generators and Hakyll from u/jaspervdj but the internationalization piece was missing. Of course there are other generators with internationalization but... Well here is one for Hakyll. * Generator source code * Use case and its source code --- If it already exists, please hide that fact from me. If not... Source: over 2 years ago
This info is relevant because Hakyll application requires to be complied before it generates the pages, and the compilation process of Haskell is a pretty expensive (computationally saying). Although, the executable is incredible fast, due to great work made by the compiler. This processing cost will be discussed soon. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
What stack are you using? I personally recommend utilizing readily available components: https://ui.shadcn.com/ https://mui.com/ https://semantic-ui.com/ etc.. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Are you cool with JS frameworks? If so, you can use a higher level of abstraction that takes care of the CSS for you. If you just want to mock something up, you can use a pre-built UI system / component framework and just put together UIs declaratively, without having to worry about the underlying CSS or HTML at all. Examples include https://mui.com/ and https://chakra-ui.com/ and https://ant.design/ Really easy... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Honestly you should build a webpage and use a UI library if you want markdown with some extra pop. Check out semantic ui. Source: over 1 year ago
A lot of proof-of-concept and MVP projects start out with a number of libraries meant to be temporary. Maybe the app was using Chakra UI for its modal and custom buttons, while the rest of the imported library is just dead weight. Perhaps developers have been spending more time adjusting Semantic UI’s styling to match the designs than it’s worth. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Semantic UI Semantic is a development framework that helps create beautiful, responsive layouts using human-friendly HTML. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design
Hexo - A fast, simple & powerful blog framework, powered by Node.js
UIKit - A lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces