Quartz might be a bit more popular than Hakyll. We know about 6 links to it since March 2021 and only 6 links to Hakyll. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Others have mentioned static site generators. I like Hakyll [1] because it can tightly integrate with Pandoc [2] and allows you to develop custom solutions if your needs ever grow. [1]: https://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/ [2]: https://pandoc.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Honestly, I've had a great experience with Hakyll for static site generation. There's a bit of a learning curve to effectively use the library/framework, but in my opinion the learning curve is much lower than Yesod/Fay. If all you need is to build static website pages, I'd suggest Hakyll. Source: almost 2 years ago
Love SSGs too! Came here to share praise for Hakyll[1], for people with an FP leaning. Predictably, it's not easy to get started, but once you're into it the power of building your own arbitrary content "compilers" (and template extensions etc etc) is pretty impressive. [1] https://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Hi there. A friend of mine wanted to publish a blog/site at both French and English. I told him about static generators and Hakyll from u/jaspervdj but the internationalization piece was missing. Of course there are other generators with internationalization but... Well here is one for Hakyll. * Generator source code * Use case and its source code --- If it already exists, please hide that fact from me. If not... Source: over 2 years ago
This info is relevant because Hakyll application requires to be complied before it generates the pages, and the compilation process of Haskell is a pretty expensive (computationally saying). Although, the executable is incredible fast, due to great work made by the compiler. This processing cost will be discussed soon. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Quartz! https://quartz.jzhao.xyz/ Beautiful, performant, native support for editing via Obsidian. I use it for my personal side, https://thestu.art. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
I know this sort of undermines this post, but just incase anyone is actually in search of a good markdown to wiki generator, use Quartz. (https://quartz.jzhao.xyz) It's basically Obsidian Publish but free. (not made by me). - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
I use Quartz* for my personal site, and just edit it directly in Obsidian. One push to GitHub and it's deployed, with very little effort. It's like Obsidian Publish, but much more customizable. Before this, I felt the same as the linked post - there was too much friction for me to ever publish anything. *: https://quartz.jzhao.xyz/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
How does this compare to all the other publishing tools? quartz: https://quartz.jzhao.xyz/, and https://github.com/devidw/obsidian-to-hugo/ are of particular interest for me. Source: 11 months ago
If I'm not mistaken, Licat is fine with Obsidian user publish their content using free alternative like Quartz , So I don't think this spam or anything like that 🤔. Source: about 2 years ago
Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
ObsidianApp.io - Elegant 2FA (2 Factor Authentication) solution for iOS and MacOS
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
Roam Research - A note-taking tool for networked thought
Grav - The modern open source flat-file CMS
Onyx by Titanium - This website provides operating system utilities for macOS