Gunicorn VS Webinoly

And Streamlit itself so far does not support Gunicorn, so its vertical scalability is limited. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

It's also worth mentioning that this Flask application is not production-ready. At the very least, you'll want to put an application server like Gunicorn in front of it (example in my repo). You'll also want to use a web server like NGINX to serve assets, or use a combination of WhiteNoise and a CDN to deliver assets. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

Every time I started the Flask service, it showed a warning in red that it shouldn't be used in production. While it's unrelated to OpenTelemetry, and though nobody complained, I was not too fond of it. For this reason, I added a "real" HTTP server. I chose Gunicorn, for no other reason than because my knowledge of the Python ecosystem is still shallow. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

The static files are managed with whitenoise, Gunicorn is used for the WSGI server and Sentry is used for error monitoring and reporting in production. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

Now, we can create the Procfile for Heroku. The Procfile contains the command that will be run once the application is deployed on Heroku. You can do this by creating a new file named Procfile and pasting the following command. We will be using Gunicorn to run the application instead of the default Flask server. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

I second Webinoly recommendation. Been using it for a number of years now, and I've had no issues all that time. Source: about 1 year ago

If you are just running Wordpress sites Webinoly is great. Source: over 1 year ago

Switched from Siteground to Vultr, haven't looked back. I use Webinoly- Optimized NGINX Web Server which is easy to setup for hosting Wordpress sites. Source: over 1 year ago

Best thing I did was to switch to VPS for hosting my Wordpress/Woocommerce. You should look into using Webinoly, or Wordops. Source: almost 3 years ago