Grunt VS Webpacker

Grunt Reviews

Webpacker Reviews

Grunt mentions (14)

• How to improve page load speed and response times: A comprehensive guide

  Many web pages use CSS and JavaScript files to handle various features and styles. Each file, however, requires a separate HTTP request, which can slow down page loading. Concatenation comes into play here. It involves combining multiple CSS or JavaScript files into a single file. As a result, pages load faster, reducing the time spent requesting individual files. Gulp, Grunt, and Webpack are some of the tools... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Build a Vite 5 backend integration with Flask

  Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them.... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Understanding package.json II: Scripts

  Keep scripts independent: Keep your scripts independent of each other to avoid dependency issues. If you need to run one script after another, use a task runner like Gulp or Grunt to define tasks and their dependencies. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago

• JavaScript Module Bundlers and all that Jazz ✨

  Browserify was great at bundling scripts, but what if we need to transform code - Say compile CoffeeScript to JavaScript, for this, a new group of tools for the web was born, which focussed on running code transforms. These are usually called task runners, and the most popular ones are Grunt and Gulp. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• The Emperor's New Library

  What we see, a decade ago, are that many of the "popular" libraries, frameworks, and methods, not surprisingly, have gone by the wayside, a lot that have remained in current code as difficult-to-removemodernize legacy cruft (Bower, Gulp, Grunt, Backbone, Angular 1, ...), and then we have the small minority that are still here. Some that remain have had their utility lessened/questioned by platform and language... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Webpacker mentions (15)

• Asset Pipeline JS Migration

  Using Webpacker in Rails provides several advantages over the traditional asset pipeline. First, Webpacker uses JavaScript modules, which allows for better code organization and improved code reusability. Second, it offers modern frontend build tools, such as Babel and PostCSS, for transforming and compiling assets. Third, it provides faster build times and faster runtime performance through code splitting and... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Thank you Webpacker, Goodbye Webpacker

  This article is replace Webpacker with Simpacker and webpack. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• How to setup ruby on rails + Angular

  In ruby ​​on rails 7 what is the best way to properly install Angular because I can't find any documentation about it. The only tutorial that exists uses webpacker (https://github.com/rails/webpacker) but unfortunately it is no longer supported and no longer up to date in terms of security. Source: over 1 year ago

• Using Rails+ReactJS with Webpacker on VS Code?

  Instead of using webpacker you should move to esbuild or importmap. Webpacker has been retired a few months ago (cf https://github.com/rails/webpacker) There are videos explained how to set this up (e.g. For importmap https://learnetto.com/tutorials/how-to-use-react-with-rails-7. Source: about 2 years ago

• Webpacker 6 development continues as shakacode/shakapacker

  But it's there in the webpacker README now, if anyone hasn't seen it. https://github.com/rails/webpacker. Source: over 2 years ago