Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Google Open Source VS rkt

Compare Google Open Source VS rkt and see what are their differences

Google Open Source logo Google Open Source

All of Googles open source projects under a single umbrella

rkt logo rkt

App Container runtime
  • Google Open Source Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22
  • rkt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08

Google Open Source features and specs

  • Community Support
    Google Open Source projects often have large, active communities that contribute to the software's development and provide support.
  • Innovation
    Google frequently publishes cutting-edge projects, allowing developers to utilize the latest in technology and innovation.
  • Quality Documentation
    Google Open Source projects generally come with comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers to integrate and utilize their tools.
  • Scalability
    Many of Google's open-source projects are designed to scale efficiently, benefiting from Google's extensive experience in handling large-scale systems.
  • Integration with Other Google Services
    Open-source projects from Google often integrate smoothly with other Google services and platforms, providing a cohesive ecosystem.

Possible disadvantages of Google Open Source

  • Dependency on Google
    Being tied to Google ecosystems might lead to dependencies, making it harder for developers to switch to other alternatives.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Some developers are wary of data privacy issues when using tools developed by Google, given the company's history with data collection.
  • Complexity
    Google’s projects can sometimes be complex, requiring a steep learning curve for developers who are not familiar with their systems and methodologies.
  • Licensing Issues
    Open-source licensing can sometimes pose challenges, especially for companies trying to ensure compliance with multiple licensing requirements.
  • Longevity and Support
    Not all Google open-source projects have long-term support, and there is a risk that some projects may be abandoned or shelved.

rkt features and specs

  • Compatibility
    rkt supports the App Container (appc) spec and can also run Docker container images, providing flexibility and compatibility with various container formats.
  • Security
    rkt is designed with security in mind, offering features like process isolation through Linux namespaces, user namespaces, and SELinux/AppArmor integration.
  • Isolation
    rkt runs applications in their own stage1 environments, ensuring strong isolation between containers and better resource management.
  • Modularity
    rkt is built with a modular architecture, allowing users to swap out the stage1 implementation to better fit their needs.
  • Lightweight
    rkt avoids running a central daemon, thus using fewer system resources and simplifying debugging and monitoring.

Possible disadvantages of rkt

  • Maturity
    rkt is not as mature as Docker, meaning it may lack some features and integrations that have been developed for Docker.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    rkt has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Docker, which may limit the availability of third-party tools and support.
  • Adoption
    rkt has lower adoption rates, leading to fewer tutorials, guides, and community-driven content, which can make the learning curve steeper.
  • Development Activity
    rkt's development and maintenance activity is not as high as Docker's, which could impact long-term viability and feature development.
  • Enterprise Support
    Enterprise-grade support and services for rkt may not be as widely available or comprehensive as those for Docker.

Google Open Source videos

No Google Open Source videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

rkt videos

RKT IPO Review | Is Rocket a Buy for 2020? | Matt Mulvihill

More videos:

  • Review - 2018 Niner RKT 9 RDO - First Look and Build Kit Overview
  • Review - Best Stock Picks Today | RKT Stock 9-2-20

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Open Source and rkt)
Developer Tools
58 58%
42% 42
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
Open Source
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Open Source and rkt. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Google Open Source and rkt

Google Open Source Reviews

We have no reviews of Google Open Source yet.
Be the first one to post

rkt Reviews

5 Container Alternatives to Docker
In 2018, 12 percent of production containers were rkt (pronounced “Rocket”). Rkt supports two types of images: Docker and appc. A selling point of rkt is its pod-based process that works out of the box with Kubernetes (also referred to as “rktnetes”). In Kubernetes, an rkt container runtime can easily be specified:

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Open Source seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Open Source mentions (22)

  • Revolutionizing Blockchain and Open Source Funding: Microfunding and Project Funding Alternatives
    Sponsorship Programs: Platforms such as GitHub Sponsors and offerings from tech giants like Google Open Source and Microsoft Open Source provide recurring support while maintaining community values. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Funding Open Source Software: Sustaining the Backbone of Modern Digital Innovation
    As digital economies matured, the limitations of relying solely on volunteer support became apparent. Numerous OSS projects found that a lack of steady revenue streams led to developer burnout, limited maintenance, and even stagnation. Today, the OSS landscape has evolved to incorporate a blend of funding methods that include individual donations for open source projects, crowdfunding via platforms like GitHub... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Open Source Funding: Strategies, Case Studies, and Best Practices
    Corporate sponsorship is a stable source of funding where companies invest directly in projects crucial to their operations. Examples include initiatives under Microsoft Open Source and Google Open Source. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Navigating Innovation and Regulation: How the Trump Administration Shaped Open Source Policy
    Beyond federal systems, the Trump administration’s policies resonated within the private sector, where companies like Google continue to drive innovation using open source platforms. Reduced government intervention and a focus on intellectual property rights created an environment where private firms had the freedom to innovate while carefully navigating the tension between open collaboration and proprietary... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Mastering the Money Matters of Open Source: Navigating the Financial Landscape
    Corporate Support – Tech giants like Google and Microsoft often contribute resources, funding, and developer expertise. Their involvement not only adds financial stability but also helps legitimize and amplify the project within the broader tech community. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
View more

rkt mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of rkt yet. Tracking of rkt recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Open Source and rkt, you can also consider the following products

Code NASA - 253 NASA open source software projects

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Disney Open Source - Explore Disney's Open Source projects

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

LaunchKit - Open Source - A popular suite of developer tools, now 100% open source.

Apache ServiceMix - Apache ServiceMix is an open source ESB that combines the functionality of a Service Oriented Architecture and the modularity.