Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Google Cloud Load Balancing VS LiteSpeed Web Server

Compare Google Cloud Load Balancing VS LiteSpeed Web Server and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Google Cloud Load Balancing logo Google Cloud Load Balancing

Google Cloud Load Balancer enables users to scale their applications on Google Compute Engine.

LiteSpeed Web Server logo LiteSpeed Web Server

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.
  • Google Cloud Load Balancing Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-29
  • LiteSpeed Web Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-31

Google Cloud Load Balancing features and specs

  • Global Load Balancing
    Google Cloud Load Balancing allows for distributing traffic across multiple regions, ensuring high availability and reliability by automatically routing traffic to the closest or least loaded backend.
  • Scalability
    Automatically scales up and down based on traffic demands without manual intervention, providing consistent performance during traffic spikes.
  • Integrated Security
    Offers built-in DDoS protection, SSL/TLS termination, and support for IAM roles, enhancing the security of your applications.
  • User-friendly Console
    Provides an easy-to-use interface for configuring and managing load balancers, making deployment and monitoring straightforward.
  • Backend Health Monitoring
    Continuously checks the health of backend services and directs traffic only to healthy instances, ensuring uninterrupted service.
  • Support for Hybrid and Multi-cloud
    Seamlessly integrates with on-premises and other cloud environments, supporting diverse deployment scenarios.

Possible disadvantages of Google Cloud Load Balancing

  • Complex Pricing
    Pricing can be complicated and may not be straightforward to calculate, potentially leading to unexpected costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Being a feature-rich service, it has a steep learning curve for new users unfamiliar with Google Cloud or advanced load balancing concepts.
  • Region Availability
    Although it offers global load balancing, specific features may only be available in certain regions, limiting some capabilities depending on the location.
  • Dependency on Google Cloud Services
    Heavily integrated with other Google Cloud services, which may pose challenges if you need to work with third-party services or other cloud providers.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Advanced configurations might require in-depth understanding and careful planning, potentially increasing the time and effort needed for optimal setup.

LiteSpeed Web Server features and specs

  • Performance
    LiteSpeed is known for its high performance, handling more traffic with fewer resources compared to traditional web servers like Apache.
  • Built-in Caching
    It comes with LSCache, which provides advanced server-side caching, significantly boosting loading times for web applications.
  • Security
    LiteSpeed includes built-in anti-DDoS features, application-level distributed defense, and the ability to mitigate different kinds of attacks effectively.
  • Easy Apache Replacement
    LiteSpeed is compatible with Apache's htaccess, mod_rewrite, and mod_security, making it easy to switch from Apache without changing configurations.
  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 Support
    LiteSpeed supports modern protocols such as HTTP/2 and HTTP/3, making it suitable for the latest website requirements and performance enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of LiteSpeed Web Server

  • Cost
    LiteSpeed is a commercial solution, and its licensing fees can be a disadvantage for smaller businesses or individual developers.
  • Proprietary Software
    Being a proprietary solution, it doesn’t offer the transparency and community support advantages of open-source web servers like Apache and Nginx.
  • Learning Curve
    Switching to LiteSpeed may involve a learning curve, especially for those accustomed to other web server technologies.
  • Limited Customization
    It may not offer the same level of customization and flexibility as some other web servers, particularly in specialized or highly unique environments.

Google Cloud Load Balancing videos

No Google Cloud Load Balancing videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

LiteSpeed Web Server videos

+ Add

What Is LiteSpeed Web Server?

More videos:

  • Review - What Is LiteSpeed Web Server?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Cloud Load Balancing and LiteSpeed Web Server)

Google Cloud Load Balancing

LiteSpeed Web Server

Web Servers
26 26%
Web Servers
74% 74
Web And Application Servers
23 23%
Web And Application Servers
77% 77
Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy
100 100%
Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy
0% 0
Application Server
0 0%
Application Server
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Cloud Load Balancing and LiteSpeed Web Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Google Cloud Load Balancing and LiteSpeed Web Server

Google Cloud Load Balancing Reviews

We have no reviews of Google Cloud Load Balancing yet.
Be the first one to post

LiteSpeed Web Server Reviews

Litespeed vs Nginx vs Apache: Web Server Showdown
LiteSpeed Web Server, abbreviated as LSWS, is almost a newcomer to the webserver ‘scene’. It has gained a huge, perhaps even cult-like following in the last few years among web hosting companies due to its efficiency. With its streamlined architecture, companies running LiteSpeed Web Server could (theoretically) double the maximum capacity of websites their servers, assuming...
Source: chemicloud.com
Top Linux Web Servers: Pros and Cons
LiteSpeed comes in two versions: a free one known as OpenLiteSpeed and a paid enterprise version with extended functionality.
Source: bigstep.com
Alternative web servers compared: Lighttpd, Nginx, LiteSpeed and Zeus
Brief info: LiteSpeed is a commercial web server designed specifically for large websites. One of LiteSpeed’s advantages is that it can read Apache configurations directly which makes it easy to integrate with existing products to replace Apache. The server is lightweight and as the name implies very fast.
Source: www.pingdom.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Cloud Load Balancing seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Cloud Load Balancing mentions (10)

View more

LiteSpeed Web Server mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of LiteSpeed Web Server yet. Tracking of LiteSpeed Web Server recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Cloud Load Balancing and LiteSpeed Web Server, you can also consider the following products

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

AWS Elastic Load Balancing - Amazon ELB automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple Amazon EC2 instances in the cloud.

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Azure Traffic Manager - Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager allows you to control the distribution of user traffic for service endpoints in different datacenters.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

Loading...