Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Google Cloud Dataflow VS Apache Oozie

Compare Google Cloud Dataflow VS Apache Oozie and see what are their differences

SysAid
SysAid is a robust IT Service Management (ITSM) platform powered by Agentic AI, automating the repetitive, time-consuming work. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Google Cloud Dataflow logo Google Cloud Dataflow

Google Cloud Dataflow is a fully-managed cloud service and programming model for batch and streaming big data processing.

Apache Oozie logo Apache Oozie

Apache Oozie Workflow Scheduler for Hadoop
  • Google Cloud Dataflow Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03
  • Apache Oozie Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-25

Google Cloud Dataflow features and specs

  • Scalability
    Google Cloud Dataflow can automatically scale up or down depending on your data processing needs, handling massive datasets with ease.
  • Fully Managed
    Dataflow is a fully managed service, which means you don't have to worry about managing the underlying infrastructure.
  • Unified Programming Model
    It provides a single programming model for both batch and streaming data processing using Apache Beam, simplifying the development process.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services like BigQuery, Cloud Storage, and Bigtable.
  • Real-time Analytics
    Supports real-time data processing, enabling quicker insights and facilitating faster decision-making.
  • Cost Efficiency
    Pay-as-you-go pricing model ensures you only pay for resources you actually use, which can be cost-effective.
  • Global Availability
    Cloud Dataflow is available globally, which allows for regionalized data processing.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Built-in fault tolerance mechanisms help ensure uninterrupted data processing.

Possible disadvantages of Google Cloud Dataflow

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The complexity of using Apache Beam and understanding its model can be challenging for beginners.
  • Debugging Difficulties
    Debugging data processing pipelines can be complex and time-consuming, especially for large-scale data flows.
  • Cost Management
    While it can be cost-efficient, the costs can rise quickly if not monitored properly, particularly with real-time data processing.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Using Google Cloud Dataflow can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate to another cloud provider.
  • Limited Support for Non-Google Services
    While it integrates well within Google Cloud, support for non-Google services may not be as robust.
  • Latency
    There can be some latency in data processing, especially when dealing with high volumes of data.
  • Complexity in Pipeline Design
    Designing pipelines to be efficient and cost-effective can be complex, requiring significant expertise.

Apache Oozie features and specs

  • Integration
    Apache Oozie is well-integrated with the Hadoop ecosystem, allowing it to schedule jobs across various components like Hive, Pig, Sqoop, and MapReduce. This makes it highly beneficial for users working in Hadoop environments.
  • Flexibility
    Oozie supports various job types and offers workflow orchestration capabilities which go beyond simple job scheduling, including decision paths, sub-workflows, and the ability to execute arbitrary shell scripts.
  • Extensibility
    It is highly extensible, allowing users to add custom action nodes in workflows. This extends its functionality beyond built-in support, accommodating more complex data processing needs.
  • Dependency Management
    Oozie provides ways to manage job dependencies, which is crucial for executing data pipelines where the output of one job may serve as the input for another.
  • Time and Event-based Triggering
    It supports both time-based and event-based triggering of workflows, which provides flexibility in how and when workflows are initiated according to specific business requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Oozie

  • Complexity
    Oozie's configuration and operation can be complex, requiring a steep learning curve for newcomers, especially those unfamiliar with XML-based configuration.
  • Limited User Interface
    Compared to other modern workflow scheduling tools, Oozie's UI is considered less intuitive and user-friendly, making it more challenging for users to manage and monitor workflows.
  • Scalability Issues
    For large-scale data processing, Oozie may face performance bottlenecks and scalability issues, especially when dealing with a vast number of concurrent workflows.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Oozie lacks some advanced features offered by newer workflow management tools, such as easy integration with modern DevOps practices, advanced failure handling, and sophisticated monitoring capabilities.
  • Resource Management
    Oozie does not offer built-in resource management, relying heavily on external tools and configurations to manage resources effectively, which can complicate workflow setups in resource-constrained environments.

Analysis of Google Cloud Dataflow

Overall verdict

  • Google Cloud Dataflow is a strong choice for users who need a flexible and scalable data processing solution. It is particularly well-suited for real-time and large-scale data processing tasks. However, the best choice ultimately depends on your specific requirements, including cost considerations, existing infrastructure, and technical skills.

Why this product is good

  • Google Cloud Dataflow is a fully managed service for stream and batch data processing. It is based on the Apache Beam model, allowing for a unified data processing approach. It is highly scalable, offers robust integration with other Google Cloud services, and provides powerful data processing capabilities. Its serverless nature means that users do not have to worry about infrastructure management, and it dynamically allocates resources based on the data processing needs.

Recommended for

  • Organizations that require real-time data processing.
  • Projects involving complex data transformations.
  • Users who already utilize Google Cloud Platform and need seamless integration with other Google services.
  • Developers and data engineers familiar with Apache Beam or those willing to learn.

Google Cloud Dataflow videos

+ Add

Introduction to Google Cloud Dataflow - Course Introduction

More videos:

  • Review - Serverless data processing with Google Cloud Dataflow (Google Cloud Next '17)
  • Review - Apache Beam and Google Cloud Dataflow

Apache Oozie videos

+ Add

Migrating Apache Oozie Workflows to Apache Airflow

More videos:

  • Review - Breathing New Life into Apache Oozie with Apache Ambari Workflow Manager
  • Review - Breathing New Life into Apache Oozie with Apache Ambari Workflow Manager

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Cloud Dataflow and Apache Oozie)

Google Cloud Dataflow

Apache Oozie

Big Data
100 100%
Big Data
0% 0
Workflow Automation
0 0%
Workflow Automation
100% 100
Data Dashboard
100 100%
Data Dashboard
0% 0
IT Automation
0 0%
IT Automation
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Cloud Dataflow and Apache Oozie. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Google Cloud Dataflow and Apache Oozie

Google Cloud Dataflow Reviews

Top 8 Apache Airflow Alternatives in 2024
Google Cloud Dataflow is highly focused on real-time streaming data and batch data processing from web resources, IoT devices, etc. Data gets cleansed and filtered as Dataflow implements Apache Beam to simplify large-scale data processing. Such prepared data is ready for analysis for Google BigQuery or other analytics tools for prediction, personalization, and other purposes.
Source: blog.skyvia.com

Apache Oozie Reviews

10 Best Airflow Alternatives for 2024
One of the workflow scheduler services/applications operating on the Hadoop cluster is Apache Oozie. It is used to handle Hadoop tasks such as Hive, Sqoop, SQL, MapReduce, and HDFS operations such as distcp. It is a system that manages the workflow of jobs that are reliant on each other. Users can design Directed Acyclic Graphs of processes here, which can be performed in...
Source: hevodata.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Cloud Dataflow seems to be a lot more popular than Apache Oozie. While we know about 14 links to Google Cloud Dataflow, we've tracked only 1 mention of Apache Oozie. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Cloud Dataflow mentions (14)

  • How do you implement CDC in your organization
    Imo if you are using the cloud and not doing anything particularly fancy the native tooling is good enough. For AWS that is DMS (for RDBMS) and Kinesis/Lamba (for streams). Google has Data Fusion and Dataflow . Azure hasData Factory if you are unfortunate enough to have to use SQL Server or Azure. Imo the vendored tools and open source tools are more useful when you need to ingest data from SaaS platforms, and... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Here’s a playlist of 7 hours of music I use to focus when I’m coding/developing. Post yours as well if you also have one!
    This sub is for Apache Beam and Google Cloud Dataflow as the sidebar suggests. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How are view/listen counts rolled up on something like Spotify/YouTube?
    I am pretty sure they are using pub/sub with probably a Dataflow pipeline to process all that data. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Best way to export several GCP datasets to AWS?
    You can run a Dataflow job that copies the data directly from BQ into S3, though you'll have to run a job per table. This can be somewhat expensive to do. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Why we don’t use Spark
    It was clear we needed something that was built specifically for our big-data SaaS requirements. Dataflow was our first idea, as the service is fully managed, highly scalable, fairly reliable and has a unified model for streaming & batch workloads. Sadly, the cost of this service was quite large. Secondly, at that moment in time, the service only accepted Java implementations, of which we had little knowledge... - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
View more

Apache Oozie mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Cloud Dataflow and Apache Oozie, you can also consider the following products

Google BigQuery - A fully managed data warehouse for large-scale data analytics.

Control-M - Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

Amazon EMR - Amazon Elastic MapReduce is a web service that makes it easy to quickly process vast amounts of data.

Stonebranch - Stonebranch builds IT orchestration and automation solutions that transform business IT environments from simple IT task automation into sophisticated, real-time business service automation.

Qubole - Qubole delivers a self-service platform for big aata analytics built on Amazon, Microsoft and Google Clouds.

ActiveBatch - Orchestrate the entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation & Job Scheduling. Build and manage workflows from one place.

Loading...