Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Google App Engine VS ASP.NET MVC

Compare Google App Engine VS ASP.NET MVC and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Google App Engine logo Google App Engine

A powerful platform to build web and mobile apps that scale automatically.

ASP.NET MVC logo ASP.NET MVC

Download ASP.NET MVC and learn how to build web apps using the model view controller pattern.
  • Google App Engine Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-17
  • ASP.NET MVC Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-26

Google App Engine features and specs

  • Auto-scaling
    Google App Engine automatically scales your application based on the traffic it receives, ensuring that your application can handle varying workloads without manual intervention.
  • Managed environment
    App Engine provides a fully managed environment, covering infrastructure management tasks like server provisioning, patching, monitoring, and managing app versions.
  • Integrated services
    Seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services such as Datastore, Cloud SQL, Pub/Sub, and more, offering a comprehensive ecosystem for building and deploying applications.
  • Multiple languages support
    Supports multiple programming languages including Java, Python, PHP, Node.js, Go, Ruby, and .NET, giving developers flexibility in choosing their preferred language.
  • Security
    Offers robust security features including Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cloud Identity, and automated security updates, which help protect your applications from vulnerabilities.
  • Developer productivity
    App Engine allows rapid development and deployment, letting developers focus on writing code without worrying about infrastructure management, thus boosting productivity.
  • Versioning
    Supports versioning of applications, allowing multiple versions of the application to be hosted simultaneously, which helps in A/B testing and rollback capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of Google App Engine

  • Cost
    While you pay for what you use, costs can escalate quickly with high traffic or resource-intensive applications. Detailed cost prediction can be challenging.
  • Vendor lock-in
    Relying heavily on Google App Engine's proprietary services and APIs can make it difficult to migrate applications to other platforms, leading to vendor lock-in.
  • Limited control
    Being a fully managed service, App Engine provides limited control over the underlying infrastructure which might be a limitation for certain advanced use cases.
  • Environment constraints
    Certain restrictions and limitations are imposed on the runtime environment, such as request timeout limits and specific resource quotas, which can affect application performance.
  • Complex debugging
    Debugging issues in a highly abstracted managed environment can be more complex and difficult compared to traditional server-hosted applications.
  • Cold start latency
    Serverless environments like App Engine can suffer from cold start latency, where the initial request triggers a delay as the environment spins up resources.
  • Configuration complexity
    Despite its benefits, configuring and optimizing App Engine for specific scenarios can be more complex than expected, requiring a steep learning curve.

ASP.NET MVC features and specs

  • Separation of Concerns
    ASP.NET MVC enforces a clear separation between the model, view, and controller components, which helps in managing and structuring code more efficiently.
  • Testability
    The framework is inherently testable due to its separation of concerns and design pattern, facilitating unit testing of both the controllers and business logic.
  • Extensibility
    ASP.NET MVC is highly extensible, allowing developers to customize components like routing, view engines, serialization, and others as per their needs.
  • Powerful Routing
    The framework provides a powerful and flexible URL routing system that makes it easy to create SEO-friendly URLs.
  • Rich Ecosystem
    Developers can leverage the rich .NET ecosystem, utilizing libraries, tools, and third-party extensions that are compatible with ASP.NET.

Possible disadvantages of ASP.NET MVC

  • Complexity for Small Applications
    For smaller applications, the overhead of setting up and maintaining the MVC structure might be more complex than necessary.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    Developers coming from a WebForms background or without MVC experience might find the ASP.NET MVC framework more challenging to learn initially.
  • Lacks Built-in Controls
    Unlike ASP.NET WebForms, ASP.NET MVC does not provide a wide range of built-in server controls, which can increase the time to develop certain UI components.
  • Heavy on Convention
    The framework is built heavily on conventions, which might not appeal to developers who prefer configuration over convention.

Google App Engine videos

+ Add

Get to know Google App Engine

More videos:

  • Review - Developing apps that scale automatically with Google App Engine

ASP.NET MVC videos

+ Add

Step-by-step ASP.NET MVC Tutorial for Beginners | Mosh

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to ASP.NET MVC in C#: Basics, Advanced Topics, Tips, Tricks, Best Practices, and More

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google App Engine and ASP.NET MVC)

Google App Engine

ASP.NET MVC

Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
Web Frameworks
100% 100
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
Cloud Hosting
0% 0
Developer Tools
72 72%
Developer Tools
28% 28

User comments

Share your experience with using Google App Engine and ASP.NET MVC. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Google App Engine and ASP.NET MVC

Google App Engine Reviews

Top 5 Alternatives to Heroku
Google App Engine is fast, easy, but not that very cheap. The pricing is reasonable, and it comes with a free tier, which is great for small projects that are right for beginner developers who want to quickly set up their apps. It can also auto scale, create new instances as needed and automatically handle high availability. App Engine gets a positive rating for performance...
Source: blog.back4app.com
AppScale - The Google App Engine Alternative
AppScale is open source Google App Engine and allows you to run your GAE applications on any infrastructure, anywhere that makes sense for your business. AppScale eliminates lock-in and makes your GAE application portable. This way you can choose which public or private cloud platform is the best fit for your business requirements. Because we are literally the GAE...
Source: blog.appscale.com

ASP.NET MVC Reviews

We have no reviews of ASP.NET MVC yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google App Engine seems to be a lot more popular than ASP.NET MVC. While we know about 31 links to Google App Engine, we've tracked only 2 mentions of ASP.NET MVC. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google App Engine mentions (31)

  • Guide to modern app-hosting without servers on Google Cloud
    If Google App Engine (GAE) is the "OG" serverless platform, Cloud Run (GCR) is its logical successor, crafted for today's modern app-hosting needs. GAE was the 1st generation of Google serverless platforms. It has since been joined, about a decade later, by 2nd generation services, GCR and Cloud Functions (GCF). GCF is somewhat out-of-scope for this post so I'll cover that another time. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Security in the Cloud: Your Role in the Shared Responsibility Model
    As Windsales Inc. expands, it adopts a PaaS model to offload server and runtime management, allowing its developers and engineers to focus on code development and deployment. By partnering with providers like Heroku and Google App Engine, Windsales Inc. Accesses a fully managed runtime environment. This choice relieves Windsales Inc. Of managing servers, OS updates, or runtime environment behavior. Instead,... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Hosting apps in the cloud with Google App Engine in 2024
    Google App Engine (GAE) is their original serverless solution and first cloud product, launching in 2008 (video), giving rise to Serverless 1.0 and the cloud computing platform-as-a-service (PaaS) service level. It didn't do function-hosting nor was the concept of containers mainstream yet. GAE was specifically for (web) app-hosting (but also supported mobile backends as well). - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Fixing A Broken Deployment to Google App Engine
    In 2014, I took a web development on Udacity that was taught by Steve Huffman of Reddit fame. He taught authentication, salting passwords, the difference between GET and POST requests, basic html and css, caching techniques. It was a fantastic introduction to web dev. To pass the course, students deployed simple python servers to Google App Engine. When I started to look for work, I opted to use code from that... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Next.js Deployment: Vercel's Charm vs. GCP's Muscle
    GCP offers a comprehensive suite of cloud services, including Compute Engine, App Engine, and Cloud Run. This translates to unparalleled control over your infrastructure and deployment configurations. Designed for large-scale applications, GCP effortlessly scales to accommodate significant traffic growth. Additionally, for projects heavily reliant on Google services like BigQuery, Cloud Storage, or AI/ML tools,... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

ASP.NET MVC mentions (2)

  • ELI5: .NET ecosystem & equivalents
    IMO, .NET's strength is Web API. If you're wanting to build user interfaces, go with Next, Nuxt or Sveltekit. If you want to build user interfaces with .NET, go with ASP.NET MVC. Source: about 2 years ago
  • OWASP Top Ten and Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
    After processing the entries, the analyzer concludes that they are all related to various versions of a product with the name "asp.net_model_view_controller" released by a company called Microsoft. All these entries correspond to a vulnerability with the CVE-2014-4075 identifier. However, the library in which the vulnerability was discovered is called "System.Web.Mvc". Most likely we'll get this name from the list... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google App Engine and ASP.NET MVC, you can also consider the following products

Salesforce Platform - Salesforce Platform is a comprehensive PaaS solution that paves the way for the developers to test, build, and mitigate the issues in the cloud application before the final deployment.

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

Dokku - Docker powered mini-Heroku in around 100 lines of Bash

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

CodeIgniter - A Fully Baked PHP Framework

Loading...