Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Gogs VS trustshare

Compare Gogs VS trustshare and see what are their differences

Gogs logo Gogs

A painless self-hosted Git service written in Go

trustshare logo trustshare

Escrow payments for marketplaces in 5 lines of code
  • Gogs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-21
  • trustshare Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24

Gogs features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Gogs is designed to be extremely lightweight and fast, running efficiently with minimal resource usage, which is ideal for personal projects or small teams.
  • Self-hosting
    By allowing users to host their own Git service, Gogs provides greater control over data privacy and security, making it suitable for sensitive projects.
  • Cross-platform Support
    Gogs can run on various operating systems including Windows, macOS, Linux, and ARM, offering flexible deployment options across different environments.
  • Easy Installation
    The installation process for Gogs is straightforward and quick, with binaries and Docker images available for different platforms, reducing setup time.
  • Active Development
    Gogs has an active open-source community and regular updates, ensuring new features, bug fixes, and improvements are continually being made.
  • Low Dependencies
    Gogs has few dependencies, simplifying the installation and maintenance process by reducing potential compatibility issues.
  • Customizable
    With a wide range of configuration options, Gogs allows users to tailor the platform to meet their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Gogs

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive Git platforms like GitLab or GitHub, Gogs lacks some advanced features such as built-in CI/CD pipelines and extensive integrations.
  • Smaller Community
    Gogs has a smaller user base compared to more popular platforms, which can lead to fewer third-party plugins, extensions, and external resources.
  • Scalability
    While Gogs is suitable for small to medium environments, it might not scale as effectively for large enterprises with extensive requirements.
  • Support
    Being an open-source project, Gogs primarily relies on community support, which may not be as immediate or extensive compared to commercial platforms offering professional support services.
  • User Interface
    While functional, Gogs' user interface is not as polished or feature-rich as those of some other Git service platforms.

trustshare features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of Gogs

Overall verdict

  • Gogs is generally well-regarded for its simplicity, performance, and ease of setup. It is particularly well-suited for users who do not need the full suite of features offered by larger Git services like GitHub or GitLab and prefer a more streamlined and resource-efficient solution.

Why this product is good

  • Gogs is a self-hosted Git service that is lightweight, easy to install, and simple to use. It's written in Go, which means it has minimal dependencies and can run on a variety of operating systems. This makes it an excellent choice for users who want to set up their own Git server with straightforward configuration and management. Gogs provides core Git functionalities and some additional features like an intuitive web interface, repository management, and user management.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking for a lightweight and easy-to-manage Git hosting solution.
  • Organizations that need a self-hosted option without the overhead of more complex systems.
  • Users who prioritize performance and simplicity over extensive features.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Gogs and trustshare)
Git
93 93%
7% 7
Code Collaboration
89 89%
11% 11
Fintech
0 0%
100% 100
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Gogs and trustshare. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Gogs and trustshare

Gogs Reviews

The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives
Lightweight: Gogs has low minimal requirements and can run on an inexpensive Raspberry Pi. Some users even run Gogs instances on their NAS devices, making it one of the few GitHub alternatives that can help you justify to your partner why you’re getting a NAS device apart from for pulling the latest episodes from your favourite anime show.
Gitea - Alternative to GitLab and GitHub
That said, Gita/Gogs is pretty. And might hold the hand of people only used to github. It is great that it is self-contained as a binary, so can be used with minimal configuration, like other front-ends.

trustshare Reviews

We have no reviews of trustshare yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Gogs seems to be a lot more popular than trustshare. While we know about 28 links to Gogs, we've tracked only 1 mention of trustshare. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Gogs mentions (28)

  • 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
    Gogs: An easy-to-setup self-hosted Git service. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Go's old $GOPATH story for development and dependencies
    Yeah, I'm actually doing that with Gitea: https://about.gitea.com/ Some people went with the forgejo fork: https://forgejo.org/ though Gitea itself was a fork of Gogs, if I remember correctly: https://gogs.io/ I also ran GitLab in the past: https://about.gitlab.com/ but keeping it updated and giving it enough resources for it to be happy was troublesome. There's also GitBucket: https://gitbucket.github.io/ and... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Forgejo forks its own path forward
    > Gitea but the other one Wouldn't that also be Gogs? https://gogs.io/ I remember when that one was what a lot of people were looking into, before the Gitea fork happened. It's odd to see how this has happened yet again, but I guess is a good thing that it's even possible in the first place, if there are indeed differing values and goals? - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Gitlab or Gitea for self-hosting Git?
    I did use https://gogs.io/ in the past. Was nice. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Beware Offers of “Help” with Your Projects
    This reminds me of Gogs [0], where the original author refused a lot of good ideas and improvements, eventually leading to a fork [1] that's now a lot more popular and active than the original. [0] https://gogs.io/ [1] https://gitea.io/en-us/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

trustshare mentions (1)

  • trustshare - Simple borderless escrow payments for marketplaces
    Trustshare is a UK fintech building borderless escrow API infrastructure to help marketplaces to go transactional in 5 lines of code. Their escrow API leverages the latest Open Banking technology for direct bank payments with over 1,000 UK and European Banks, supporting marketplace payments in over 180 countries and 55 currencies globally. Shortlisted as the Top 20 fintechs to watch in 2021 by Business Insider,... Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Gogs and trustshare, you can also consider the following products

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Pavooq - Pavooq is the analytics tool for work communicators, like Slack, MS Teams, Zoom, and work emails.

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

Codekeeper - Source code escrow for developers

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Parse.ly Analytics - Analytics for understanding audience attention