Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GNU Make VS Gulp.js

Compare GNU Make VS Gulp.js and see what are their differences

This page does not exist

GNU Make logo GNU Make

GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Gulp.js logo Gulp.js

Automate and enhance your workflow
  • GNU Make Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12
  • Gulp.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-26

GNU Make features and specs

  • Portability
    GNU Make is highly portable and can be used across various Unix-like operating systems as well as on Windows.
  • Dependency Management
    It efficiently handles complex dependencies between various parts of the software, ensuring that changes are propagated properly.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source software, GNU Make is freely available and can be modified according to user needs.
  • Wide Adoption
    It is widely adopted in the industry, which means that there is extensive documentation and a large community for support.
  • Efficiency
    GNU Make speeds up the build process by only recompiling the necessary parts of the codebase.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Make

  • Complex Syntax
    The syntax of GNU Makefiles can become very complex, especially for large projects, making them hard to read and maintain.
  • Limited Cross-Platform Scripting
    While the tool itself is cross-platform, Makefiles can sometimes include shell commands that are not portable.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Beginners may find it challenging to grasp the concepts and syntax of GNU Make, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Debugging Difficulty
    Debugging Makefiles can be difficult, with limited tools available to trace or step through the make process.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    For extremely large projects, performance can become an issue, as the evaluation of dependencies might become slow.

Gulp.js features and specs

  • Efficiency
    Gulp.js is designed to be fast and efficient, handling asynchronous task execution seamlessly, reducing build times compared to many other task runners.
  • Code over Configuration
    Gulp uses code instead of complex configuration files, making it easier for developers to set up tasks in JavaScript, which can be more intuitive and flexible.
  • Strong Ecosystem
    Gulp has a rich ecosystem of plugins available for virtually any task a developer might need, from CSS preprocessing to live reloading, making it highly extensible.
  • Stream Processing
    Gulp leverages Node.js streams to process files, which helps in chaining tasks and minimizes the need to write temporary files, making tasks faster and more memory efficient.
  • Easy to Read and Maintain
    Gulp files are typically concise and easy to read, which can help in maintaining and updating build processes as project requirements evolve.

Possible disadvantages of Gulp.js

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For developers new to task runners or Node.js, Gulp can have a steep learning curve due to the need to understand concepts such as streams, pipes, and asynchronous execution.
  • Plugin Dependencies
    Relying on Gulp plugins can sometimes lead to compatibility issues or outdated plugins, which might require developers to write custom tasks or wait for plugin updates.
  • Limited Debugging
    Debugging Gulp tasks can be challenging, as error messages are not always descriptive, and tracking down bugs in the build process may require additional effort.
  • Maintenance Overhead
    Maintaining a Gulp setup can become burdensome as the number of tasks and complexity of the build process grows, potentially leading to complicated and hard-to-manage code.
  • Changing APIs
    Gulp has undergone significant changes across its major versions, which can lead to breaking changes and the need to refactor build scripts when upgrading.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Make and Gulp.js)
Front End Package Manager
Web Application Bundler
0 0%
100% 100
JS Build Tools
50 50%
50% 50
JavaScript Package Manager

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Make and Gulp.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Gulp.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 28 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Make mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Make yet. Tracking of GNU Make recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Gulp.js mentions (28)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Make and Gulp.js, you can also consider the following products

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Grunt - The Grunt ecosystem is huge and it's growing every day.

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

Parcel - Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler