Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GNU Bourne Again SHell VS Tiny C Compiler

Compare GNU Bourne Again SHell VS Tiny C Compiler and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

GNU Bourne Again SHell logo GNU Bourne Again SHell

Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.

Tiny C Compiler logo Tiny C Compiler

The Tiny C Compiler is an x86, x86-64 and ARM processor C compiler created by Fabrice Bellard.
  • GNU Bourne Again SHell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-14
  • Tiny C Compiler Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-11-06

GNU Bourne Again SHell features and specs

  • Compatibility
    Bash is highly compatible with sh, the original Bourne Shell, making it easy for users familiar with other Unix-like systems to adapt.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    Bash supports a wide range of scripting functionalities, including command substitution, variables, and control structures, making it powerful for complex scripting tasks.
  • Widespread Usage
    Bash is the default shell for many Linux distributions and macOS, ensuring widespread availability and community support.
  • Interactive Use
    Bash offers interactive features such as command line editing, history substitution, and tab completion, enhancing user productivity.
  • Strong Community and Resources
    There is a robust community around Bash, providing a wealth of resources including documentation, tutorials, and forums for support.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Bourne Again SHell

  • Performance Overhead
    When compared to newer shells like Zsh or Fish, Bash can have slower performance due to its older architecture and design.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Bash lacks some of the advanced features and improvements found in other modern shells, such as better autocomplete functionality and enhanced scripting syntax.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    The robust feature set of Bash can be overwhelming to new users, especially those unfamiliar with command-line interfaces.
  • Error Handling
    Bash scripts can be prone to errors if not carefully handled, as it has limited debugging facilities compared to languages specifically designed for scripting.

Tiny C Compiler features and specs

  • Fast Compilation
    Tiny C Compiler (TCC) is known for its incredibly fast compilation speed, which makes it ideal for quick compilations and testing.
  • Small Size
    TCC has a very small footprint compared to other compilers, making it easy to include in applications and use in environments with limited resources.
  • C99 Support
    TCC provides support for the C99 standard, allowing the use of newer C language features.
  • Dynamic Code Generation
    TCC can compile and execute code dynamically, which can be useful for scripting or embedded contexts.
  • Simplified Licensing
    Under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), TCC can be more easily used in various projects, including proprietary ones, compared to compilers with more restrictive licenses.

Possible disadvantages of Tiny C Compiler

  • Limited Optimization
    TCC does not perform extensive optimization, which can result in less efficient executable code compared to compilers like GCC or Clang.
  • Incomplete C Standard Library
    TCC's standard C library implementation is not as complete as those of more established compilers, which might lead to compatibility issues.
  • Lack of Detailed Documentation
    Users may find the available documentation lacking in detail, which can hinder learning and debugging for complex projects.
  • Limited Platform Support
    TCC is primarily designed for smaller-scale applications and lacks some platform-specific and cross-compilation capabilities.
  • Fewer Community Resources
    Compared to major compilers like GCC or Clang, TCC has a smaller user community, which can mean fewer tutorials, forums, and third-party support tools.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Bourne Again SHell and Tiny C Compiler)
Cryptocurrencies
100 100%
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
100% 100
Blockchain
100 100%
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Bourne Again SHell and Tiny C Compiler. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Tiny C Compiler seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 35 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Bourne Again SHell mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Bourne Again SHell yet. Tracking of GNU Bourne Again SHell recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Tiny C Compiler mentions (35)

  • Weird Lexical Syntax
    > I'm not sure who wants to be able to syntax highlight C at 35 MB per second, but I am now able to do so Fast, but tcc *compiles* C to binary code at 29 MB/s on a really old computer: https://bellard.org/tcc/#speed. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Pnut: A C to POSIX Shell Compiler you can Trust
    "Because Pnut can be distributed as a human-readable shell script (`pnut.sh`), it can serve as the basis for a reproducible build system. With a POSIX compliant shell, `pnut.sh` is sufficiently powerful to compile itself and, with some effort, [TCC](https://bellard.org/tcc/). Because TCC can be used to bootstrap GCC, this makes it possible to bootstrap a fully featured build toolchain from only human-readable... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Cwerg: C-like language that can be implemented in 10kLOC
    For what it's worth you can implement a C compiler in under 10kLOC. The chibi C compiler is only a few thousand lines [1]. There is also Cake [2] and the tiny C compiler [3] which are both relatively small. [1] https://github.com/rui314/chibicc [3] https://bellard.org/tcc/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Exploring the Internals of Linux v0.01
    I was going to say, the list should include something by Fabrice Bellard. Tiny C Compiler is one. https://bellard.org/tcc/ I was thinking, maybe first version/commit of QEMU would be interesting to read. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • The C Interpreter: A Tutorial for Cin
    I occasionally use tcc (https://bellard.org/tcc/) like an interpreter (`tcc -run`), it's convenient for certain odd tasks. Not so much for interactive stuff, but if I'm building little PoCs for an idea that will get dropped into a C project, or fiddling with structs work out how something should/is being stored, or in situations where I'm making stuff that interacts with or examples based on C code and I want to... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Bourne Again SHell and Tiny C Compiler, you can also consider the following products

fish shell - The friendly interactive shell.

GNU Compiler Collection - The GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) is a compiler system produced by the GNU Project supporting...

zsh - The Z shell (Zsh) is a Unix shell that can be used as an interactive login shell and as a powerful command interpreter for shell scripting.

clang - C, C++, Objective C and Objective C++ front-end for the LLVM compiler.

PowerShell Plus - Learn how to learn and master PowerShell fast with an interactive learning center, a powerful IDE, pre-loaded scripts, and a PowerShell Editor… all for free.

LLVM - LLVM is a compiler infrastructure designed for compile-time, link-time, run-time, and...