Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GNU Bourne Again SHell VS the xonsh shell

Compare GNU Bourne Again SHell VS the xonsh shell and see what are their differences

GNU Bourne Again SHell logo GNU Bourne Again SHell

Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.

the xonsh shell logo the xonsh shell

Xonsh is a Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell language and command prompt.
  • GNU Bourne Again SHell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-14
  • the xonsh shell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-07

GNU Bourne Again SHell features and specs

  • Compatibility
    Bash is highly compatible with sh, the original Bourne Shell, making it easy for users familiar with other Unix-like systems to adapt.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    Bash supports a wide range of scripting functionalities, including command substitution, variables, and control structures, making it powerful for complex scripting tasks.
  • Widespread Usage
    Bash is the default shell for many Linux distributions and macOS, ensuring widespread availability and community support.
  • Interactive Use
    Bash offers interactive features such as command line editing, history substitution, and tab completion, enhancing user productivity.
  • Strong Community and Resources
    There is a robust community around Bash, providing a wealth of resources including documentation, tutorials, and forums for support.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Bourne Again SHell

  • Performance Overhead
    When compared to newer shells like Zsh or Fish, Bash can have slower performance due to its older architecture and design.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Bash lacks some of the advanced features and improvements found in other modern shells, such as better autocomplete functionality and enhanced scripting syntax.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    The robust feature set of Bash can be overwhelming to new users, especially those unfamiliar with command-line interfaces.
  • Error Handling
    Bash scripts can be prone to errors if not carefully handled, as it has limited debugging facilities compared to languages specifically designed for scripting.

the xonsh shell features and specs

  • Python Integration
    Xonsh allows the use of Python throughout the shell session, enabling powerful scripting, access to Python libraries, and seamless integration with Python code.
  • Extensible
    Due to its foundation in Python, xonsh is highly extensible and customizable, allowing users to create plugins or modify the shell's behavior to suit their needs.
  • Unified Environment
    Xonsh provides a unified environment for both command-line operations and Python scripting, reducing the need to switch contexts and improving workflow efficiency.
  • Cross-Platform
    Xonsh runs on multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing a consistent shell experience across different platforms.
  • Rich Features
    Xonsh offers features like syntax highlighting, auto-completion, and history search, which enhance productivity and make the shell more user-friendly.

Possible disadvantages of the xonsh shell

  • Learning Curve
    Users unfamiliar with Python or new to xonsh may face a steeper learning curve, especially when transitioning from other shell environments.
  • Performance Overhead
    Being implemented in Python, xonsh might experience performance overhead, particularly when dealing with large and complex shell scripts compared to traditional shells like Bash.
  • Community and Support
    While growing, xonsh's community is smaller than those of more established shells, which might affect the availability of community support and third-party resources.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Scripts or features heavily reliant on legacy shell-specific behavior may face compatibility issues, requiring adjustments when running in xonsh.
  • Limited Adoption
    As a relatively new shell, xonsh may have limited adoption in enterprise environments, potentially impacting its integration into existing systems or workflows.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Bourne Again SHell and the xonsh shell)
Cryptocurrencies
44 44%
56% 56
Blockchain
46 46%
54% 54
Developer Tools
47 47%
53% 53
Cryptocurrency Wallets
48 48%
52% 52

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Bourne Again SHell and the xonsh shell. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, the xonsh shell seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 78 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Bourne Again SHell mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Bourne Again SHell yet. Tracking of GNU Bourne Again SHell recommendations started around Mar 2021.

the xonsh shell mentions (78)

  • Advanced Shell Scripting with Bash (2006) [pdf]
    (Not sure about the equivalent of shlex.quote, but in the worst case, you can just use "from shlex import quote as q" or something). So yes, there are good alternatives to bash - even Python based. [0] https://xon.sh/. - Source: Hacker News / 18 days ago
  • Advanced Shell Scripting with Bash (2006) [pdf]
    > Wondering what others have found to address this. Or if they just stuck with Bash, since it's just not going away anytime soon. If you're familiar with Python, give xonsh (https://xon.sh/) a go. It's a Bash-like shell but the syntax is Python. It has the same ease of writing shell scripts as Bash does, sans the insane language. Been using it since 2018. - Source: Hacker News / 18 days ago
  • Fish 4.0: The Fish of Theseus
    Also, do consider xonsh.[1] It's a Bash-like shell written in Python. It has significant overlap with the awesomeness of fish, and has the advantage of being able to write your shell scripts in a Python dialect. So if you know Python, the mental burden is much lower. On top of that, it's cross platform, since Python is. No WSL needed. I switched to it in 2018 and haven't looked back. Originally it was just because... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • A Second Search for Bash Scripting Alternatives
    No xonsh? (https://xon.sh/) Seems to hit most of the requirements. Been happily using it since 2018. It's great not to have to learn a whole other language just to do scripting. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • The Dune Shell
    Interesting thought experiment. Reminds me of my cousin's project Xonsh https://xon.sh/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Bourne Again SHell and the xonsh shell, you can also consider the following products

fish shell - The friendly interactive shell.

zsh - The Z shell (Zsh) is a Unix shell that can be used as an interactive login shell and as a powerful command interpreter for shell scripting.

Nu Shell - A modern shell written in Rust

PowerShell Plus - Learn how to learn and master PowerShell fast with an interactive learning center, a powerful IDE, pre-loaded scripts, and a PowerShell Editor… all for free.

KornShell - The KornShell language was designed and developed by David G. Korn at AT&T Bell Laboratories.

DASH - DASH is a secure, blockchain-based global financial network which offers private transactions.