Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GNU Bourne Again SHell VS NASM

Compare GNU Bourne Again SHell VS NASM and see what are their differences

monday.com
The most intuitive platform to manage projects and teamwork featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

GNU Bourne Again SHell logo GNU Bourne Again SHell

Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.

NASM logo NASM

The Netwide Assembler, NASM, is an 80x86 and x86-64 assembler designed for portability and...
  • GNU Bourne Again SHell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-14
  • NASM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-11

GNU Bourne Again SHell features and specs

  • Compatibility
    Bash is highly compatible with sh, the original Bourne Shell, making it easy for users familiar with other Unix-like systems to adapt.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    Bash supports a wide range of scripting functionalities, including command substitution, variables, and control structures, making it powerful for complex scripting tasks.
  • Widespread Usage
    Bash is the default shell for many Linux distributions and macOS, ensuring widespread availability and community support.
  • Interactive Use
    Bash offers interactive features such as command line editing, history substitution, and tab completion, enhancing user productivity.
  • Strong Community and Resources
    There is a robust community around Bash, providing a wealth of resources including documentation, tutorials, and forums for support.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Bourne Again SHell

  • Performance Overhead
    When compared to newer shells like Zsh or Fish, Bash can have slower performance due to its older architecture and design.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Bash lacks some of the advanced features and improvements found in other modern shells, such as better autocomplete functionality and enhanced scripting syntax.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    The robust feature set of Bash can be overwhelming to new users, especially those unfamiliar with command-line interfaces.
  • Error Handling
    Bash scripts can be prone to errors if not carefully handled, as it has limited debugging facilities compared to languages specifically designed for scripting.

NASM features and specs

  • Standardization
    NASM (Netwide Assembler) uses a standard and simple syntax that is consistent across different platforms and projects, making it easier for programmers to read and write assembly code.
  • Cross-Platform
    NASM supports multiple operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, allowing developers to write assembly code that can be assembled on different platforms.
  • Wide Compatibility
    NASM is compatible with numerous output formats such as ELF, COFF, and Mach-O, which makes it versatile for different types of development, including system-level programming and application software.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, NASM allows developers to contribute to its development or adapt it to fit specific needs, granting a high degree of flexibility and customization.
  • Active Community
    NASM has an active user and developer community, providing extensive support, resources, and regular updates that help address issues and enhance features.

Possible disadvantages of NASM

  • Low-Level Language
    Writing in assembly language, including NASM, is inherently low-level, making it complex and time-consuming compared to high-level programming languages.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    NASM requires a significant understanding of assembly language and computer architecture, which may present a steep learning curve for beginners.
  • Error-Prone
    Due to its low-level nature, development in NASM is prone to errors, such as memory management bugs, which can be difficult to debug.
  • Limited Use Cases
    While powerful, NASM is generally used for specific use cases like embedded systems, operating system development, or performance-critical applications, limiting its utility for general software development.
  • Maintenance Difficulty
    Assembly code is less maintainable over time compared to high-level languages, as it can be harder for developers to understand and update long after it was originally written.

Analysis of GNU Bourne Again SHell

Overall verdict

  • Bash is generally considered an excellent tool for both beginners and advanced users who need to interact with Unix/Linux operating systems. Its strong scripting abilities and widespread use make it a valuable asset for many computing tasks.

Why this product is good

  • GNU Bourne Again SHell (Bash) is widely regarded as a robust and powerful command-line interface that is highly versatile. It is known for its scripting capabilities, automation potential, and extensive support available from the community. Bash is a cornerstone for system administrators and developers due to its integration with Unix and Linux systems, providing strong compatibility and productivity enhancements.

Recommended for

  • System administrators
  • DevOps professionals
  • Software developers
  • Data analysts
  • IT students

GNU Bourne Again SHell videos

No GNU Bourne Again SHell videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

NASM videos

+ Add

Why you should NOT get the NASM CPT || Certification

More videos:

  • Review - NASM CPT Certification | Chapter 1-20 Review |SHOW UP FITNESS PASS NASM GUARANTEED ONLINE INTERNSHIP
  • Review - NASM CPT review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Bourne Again SHell and NASM)

GNU Bourne Again SHell

NASM

Cryptocurrencies
100 100%
Cryptocurrencies
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
IDE
100% 100
Blockchain
100 100%
Blockchain
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
Text Editors
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Bourne Again SHell and NASM. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NASM seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Bourne Again SHell mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Bourne Again SHell yet. Tracking of GNU Bourne Again SHell recommendations started around Mar 2021.

NASM mentions (3)

  • How to improve at x86/C?
    Try https://nasm.us/ as a modern way to use assembly. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Help needed for asm related project
    Assembly is machine specific, have a look at NASM for a more generic assembly language. https://nasm.us/. Source: about 2 years ago
  • vcpkg now (finally) has site with search functionality
    I have a weird problem: when I try using vcpkg on my work laptop, it cannot download nasm. Instead of nasm, I get an HTML page that explains that I am kept safe and secure by CSIS who blocked downloads from this dangerous domain. Vcpkg barfs on the HTML file (as it should). Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Bourne Again SHell and NASM, you can also consider the following products

fish shell - The friendly interactive shell.

Yasm - Yasm is a complete rewrite of the NASM assembler.

zsh - The Z shell (Zsh) is a Unix shell that can be used as an interactive login shell and as a powerful command interpreter for shell scripting.

PCem - PCem emulates an IBM 5150 PC, several models of clones and successors, along with various graphics...

PowerShell Plus - Learn how to learn and master PowerShell fast with an interactive learning center, a powerful IDE, pre-loaded scripts, and a PowerShell Editor… all for free.

flat assembler - A fast and efficient self-assembling x86 assembler for DOS, Windows and Linux.

Loading...