Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GNU Bourne Again SHell VS fshell

Compare GNU Bourne Again SHell VS fshell and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

GNU Bourne Again SHell logo GNU Bourne Again SHell

Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.

fshell logo fshell

fshell is the Symbian equivalent of bash + telnet + a posix-like set of command-line tools.
  • GNU Bourne Again SHell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-14
  • fshell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-15

GNU Bourne Again SHell features and specs

  • Compatibility
    Bash is highly compatible with sh, the original Bourne Shell, making it easy for users familiar with other Unix-like systems to adapt.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    Bash supports a wide range of scripting functionalities, including command substitution, variables, and control structures, making it powerful for complex scripting tasks.
  • Widespread Usage
    Bash is the default shell for many Linux distributions and macOS, ensuring widespread availability and community support.
  • Interactive Use
    Bash offers interactive features such as command line editing, history substitution, and tab completion, enhancing user productivity.
  • Strong Community and Resources
    There is a robust community around Bash, providing a wealth of resources including documentation, tutorials, and forums for support.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Bourne Again SHell

  • Performance Overhead
    When compared to newer shells like Zsh or Fish, Bash can have slower performance due to its older architecture and design.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Bash lacks some of the advanced features and improvements found in other modern shells, such as better autocomplete functionality and enhanced scripting syntax.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    The robust feature set of Bash can be overwhelming to new users, especially those unfamiliar with command-line interfaces.
  • Error Handling
    Bash scripts can be prone to errors if not carefully handled, as it has limited debugging facilities compared to languages specifically designed for scripting.

fshell features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Bourne Again SHell and fshell)

GNU Bourne Again SHell

fshell

Cryptocurrencies
85 85%
Cryptocurrencies
15% 15
Blockchain
83 83%
Blockchain
17% 17
Developer Tools
79 79%
Developer Tools
21% 21
Cryptocurrency Wallets
72 72%
Cryptocurrency Wallets
28% 28

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Bourne Again SHell and fshell. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Bourne Again SHell and fshell, you can also consider the following products

fish shell - The friendly interactive shell.

zsh - The Z shell (Zsh) is a Unix shell that can be used as an interactive login shell and as a powerful command interpreter for shell scripting.

DASH - DASH is a secure, blockchain-based global financial network which offers private transactions.

PowerShell Plus - Learn how to learn and master PowerShell fast with an interactive learning center, a powerful IDE, pre-loaded scripts, and a PowerShell Editor… all for free.

the xonsh shell - Xonsh is a Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell language and command prompt.

PowerGui - A graphical user interface and script editor for Microsoft Windows https://alternativeto.

Loading...