GlusterFS VS DockerSlim

I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: 12 months ago

If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: almost 3 years ago

I have heard of slim.ai, there core tool is open source Https://github.com/docker-slim/docker-slim. Source: almost 2 years ago

* We have a lightweight engineering process based on trust, self-alignment and visibility. Email me at cto@slim.ai if you'd like to learn more. P.S. Take a look at DockerSlim ( https://github.com/docker-slim/docker-slim ) if you are interested in working on the open source project that powers our SaaS. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

In last weeks blog I talked about what my plan was for release 2.9. My main areas of concern was finishing the migration to make use of the images stored in our Docker registry. The other area I was planning on taking on was to slim down those images in the registry by using Docker-Slim. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

Or you can save your time micromanaging your Dockerfile and just use docker-slim. Source: about 2 years ago

In my experience docker-slim[0] is the way to go for creating minimal and secure Docker images. I wasted a lot of time in the past trying to ship with Alpine base images and statically compiling complicated software. All the performance, compatibility, package availability headaches this brings is not worth it when docker-slim does a better job of removing OS from your images while letting you use any base image... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago