Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GlusterFS VS AppImageKit

Compare GlusterFS VS AppImageKit and see what are their differences

GlusterFS logo GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

AppImageKit logo AppImageKit

Linux apps that run anywhere
  • GlusterFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-10
  • AppImageKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18

GlusterFS videos

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

AppImageKit videos

No AppImageKit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GlusterFS and AppImageKit)
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GlusterFS and AppImageKit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AppImageKit seems to be a lot more popular than GlusterFS. While we know about 52 links to AppImageKit, we've tracked only 2 mentions of GlusterFS. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GlusterFS mentions (2)

  • [D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
    I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: about 1 year ago
  • Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
    If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: almost 3 years ago

AppImageKit mentions (52)

  • GoboLinux
    What you're looking for sounds like AppImages (https://appimage.org/) . I have only used them while downloading games from itch.io, etc. (since I prefer package managers) but they seem to work out of the box on popular distros. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Bitwarden Heist – How to Break into Password Vaults Without Using Passwords
    Ideally a new instance of the application is installed for each user. This also provides better isolation if one user upgrades/removes/breaks their application instance. I, for one, have really come around to the AppImage model [0] in the last couple of years. [0] https://appimage.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: What's the best CLI installation experience you've ever seen?
    There is AppImage[1], which packs a lot of stuff into a SquashFS filesystem, appends it to the executable, so everything is in one file. [1] https://appimage.org. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Linux users when their preferred app isn't packaged in the main repository
    Nah I think yall just hating appimage. Real gold standard. Source: 11 months ago
  • How to minimize RAM usage during Go binary compilation
    Although I haven't used plugins feature myself yet, this does sound like the perfect use case for them. Not every patient needs to access every single source. With plugins you can load only the source (or few sources) that they actually need. You can still use something like https://appimage.org/ to give them "a single binary", but will actually contain your slim binary and all the plugins. Source: 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GlusterFS and AppImageKit, you can also consider the following products

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

Flatpak - Flatpak is the new framework for desktop applications on Linux

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

FLATHUB - Apps for Linux, right here

rkt - App Container runtime

Snapcraft - Snaps are software packages that are simple to create and install.