Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GlassFish Server VS Red Hat JBoss EAP

Compare GlassFish Server VS Red Hat JBoss EAP and see what are their differences

GlassFish Server logo GlassFish Server

GlassFish Server is an open-source java application server.

Red Hat JBoss EAP logo Red Hat JBoss EAP

Use Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform to build, deploy, and host Java applications and services—quickly and flexibly.
  • GlassFish Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-06
  • Red Hat JBoss EAP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-21

GlassFish Server features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Red Hat JBoss EAP features and specs

  • Enterprise-grade Support
    Red Hat JBoss EAP comes with enterprise-grade support from Red Hat, providing reliable assistance and updates, which is crucial for businesses that require consistent performance and security.
  • Integration Capabilities
    JBoss EAP offers strong integration with other Red Hat products and third-party tools, making it a versatile choice for organizations that need to develop complex applications.
  • Compliance and Certification
    Being a product from Red Hat, JBoss EAP is compliant with various industry standards and certifications, which boosts its credibility and trustworthiness in enterprise environments.
  • Scalability
    JBoss EAP is designed to handle scalable, mission-critical applications, and provides features like clustering and distributed caching to support high availability and load balancing.
  • Open Source Foundations
    As an open source product, JBoss EAP allows for transparency, flexibility, and adaptability, enabling businesses to customize the platform according to their needs.

Possible disadvantages of Red Hat JBoss EAP

  • Cost
    While JBoss EAP itself is open source, enterprise-grade support and additional services from Red Hat come with licensing costs, which can be a disadvantage compared to purely free alternatives.
  • Complexity
    For smaller teams or projects, JBoss EAP might be overly complex, offering more features than necessary, which can make the learning curve and initial setup daunting.
  • Resource Intensive
    JBoss EAP can be resource-intensive, requiring substantial server and memory resources to run efficiently, particularly in a production environment, making it potentially costly in terms of hardware.
  • Configuration Management
    Managing the configuration of JBoss EAP can be cumbersome without proper tools, as changes might require significant manual intervention and understanding.
  • Community vs Enterprise Versions
    There can be confusion or disparities between the community version (WildFly) and the enterprise version (JBoss EAP), which may affect decisions around upgrades and migration.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GlassFish Server and Red Hat JBoss EAP)
Application Server
36 36%
64% 64
Web Servers
46 46%
54% 54
Web And Application Servers
Java
39 39%
61% 61

User comments

Share your experience with using GlassFish Server and Red Hat JBoss EAP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GlassFish Server and Red Hat JBoss EAP, you can also consider the following products

Payara Server - Payara Server is a fully supported, developer-friendly, open source application server. Innovative, cloud-native, optimized for production deployments. Jakarta EE & MicroProfile compatible.

Wildfly - WildFly is a flexible, lightweight application server.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Oracle WebLogic - Receive a complimentary technical review and consultation on moving your Oracle WebLogic Server applications into containers.

Eclipse Jetty - Jetty is a highly scalable modular servlet engine and http server that natively supports many modern protocols like SPDY and WebSockets.

JBoss - JBoss is Red Hats Java EE 5-compliant (soon Java EE 6-compliant) application server.