Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
G
GH

Githunt VS Git History

Compare Githunt VS Git History and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Githunt logo Githunt

Explore the top projects on GitHub 🏆

Git History logo Git History

Quickly browse the history of any GitHub file Replace github.com with github.githistory.xyz in any file url.
  • Githunt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-25
  • Git History Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-13

Githunt features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Githunt offers a simple and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and discover trending GitHub repositories.
  • Daily Updates
    The platform provides daily updates of trending repositories, ensuring users have access to the most current popular projects.
  • Category Filtering
    Users can filter repositories by language and time frame, allowing for more tailored and relevant search results.
  • Streamlined Discovery
    Githunt simplifies the process of finding trending repositories, saving users time and effort compared to searching directly on GitHub.

Possible disadvantages of Githunt

  • Limited Scope
    The platform mainly focuses on trending repositories, which might overlook less popular but high-quality projects.
  • Dependence on GitHub API
    Githunt relies heavily on GitHub's API for data, and any changes or limitations to the API could affect its functionality.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Githunt is more suited for basic searches and lacks advanced features and filters that a more intensive search might require.

Git History features and specs

  • Easy Visualization
    Git History provides an intuitive interface to visualize the commit history of a Git repository, making it easier to understand the project's development timeline.
  • Interactive Features
    The tool offers interactive features, such as the ability to click on specific commits to see detailed information, including lines of code changed, author, and timestamps.
  • No Installation Required
    As a web-based tool, Git History does not require any installation, allowing users to access it from any device with a web browser.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, Git History allows developers to contribute improvements or customize the tool according to their needs.

Possible disadvantages of Git History

  • Limited Functionality
    Compared to robust Git clients, Git History may lack some advanced features such as rebasing or detailed branch management.
  • Performance Issues
    For large repositories, Git History might suffer from performance lags or may not handle the complexity efficiently.
  • Dependency on GitHub
    The tool requires repositories to be hosted on GitHub, limiting its use for repositories hosted on other platforms.
  • Security Concerns
    Using a web-based tool means potential exposure to security vulnerabilities, particularly if sensitive information is being accessed.

Githunt videos

No Githunt videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Git History videos

+ Add

How to view git history of files in vscode | git commit history and local history without extension

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Githunt and Git History)

Githunt

Git History

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Git
0 0%
Git
100% 100
Productivity
73 73%
Productivity
27% 27
Data Dashboard
0 0%
Data Dashboard
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Githunt and Git History. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Git History seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Githunt mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Githunt yet. Tracking of Githunt recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Git History mentions (2)

  • Github on Steroids
    Sometime you want to know what changes have been made to a file. Github do have a history button for a file, but In my opinion, it's not really detail and still have to click a a lot of things. Luckily there is another awesome tool Git History. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Scrollycoding – A new way to write code walkthroughs
    I also have this project http://githistory.xyz/, I want to make a new version of it specific for tutorials, using commit messages or git notes to display a better description of each step. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Githunt and Git History, you can also consider the following products

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

Waydev - Waydev analyzes your codebase from Github, Gitlab, Azure DevOps & Bitbucket to help you bring out the best in your engineers work.

GitHub Repository Size - Browser extension to show file and repo size in GitHub

Git analytics - for software developers, teams, and open-source communities

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

gitui - blazing fast terminal-ui for git

Loading...