Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GitHub Reader VS Gitea

Compare GitHub Reader VS Gitea and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

GitHub Reader logo GitHub Reader

A quick way to browse GitHub issues and pull requests.

Gitea logo Gitea

A painless self-hosted Git service
  • GitHub Reader Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-01-14
  • Gitea Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-20

GitHub Reader features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    GitHub Reader simplifies the process of browsing and reading issues from GitHub repositories, making it more user-friendly compared to using GitHub directly.
  • Efficient Issue Tracking
    The tool provides a streamlined interface for tracking and managing issues, improving productivity for developers and project managers.
  • Enhanced Search Capabilities
    GitHub Reader offers advanced search features that allow users to quickly find specific issues without needing deep knowledge of search syntax.
  • Cross-Platform Access
    As a web-based tool, GitHub Reader is accessible from any device with a web browser, offering flexibility for users to manage their workload on-the-go.

Possible disadvantages of GitHub Reader

  • Limited Functionality
    While GitHub Reader is useful for reading and navigating issues, it may lack some advanced features found on the official GitHub site, such as code review tools or integrated CI/CD services.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    Being a web-based tool, GitHub Reader requires a stable internet connection, which might be a limitation for users in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Potential Security Concerns
    As a third-party tool interacting with GitHub data, there could be security and privacy concerns that users need to consider, especially for sensitive or private repositories.
  • Integration Limitations
    GitHub Reader might not support all third-party integrations or extensions available on GitHub, which can be a disadvantage for users relying on specific workflows.

Gitea features and specs

  • Open Source
    Gitea is open source, allowing users to freely inspect, modify, and contribute to its codebase. This fosters transparency and community-driven development.
  • Lightweight
    Gitea is designed to be lightweight, making it easy to run even on resource-limited systems. This makes it ideal for self-hosted environments.
  • Easy Installation
    Gitea offers a straightforward installation process, making it simple for users to get up and running quickly without complex setup procedures.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Despite being lightweight, Gitea provides a robust feature set, including issue tracking, pull requests, and continuous integration support, which covers the majority of use cases.
  • Active Community
    Gitea has an active and growing community, which contributes to its development and provides support through forums, documentation, and tutorials.
  • Customizable
    Gitea allows for extensive customization through configuration options and extensions, enabling users to tailor the platform to their specific needs.
  • Self-Hosting
    Users have full control over their repositories and data when self-hosting Gitea, which enhances privacy and security compared to third-party hosting services.

Possible disadvantages of Gitea

  • Limited Enterprise Features
    Gitea may lack some advanced enterprise features found in other platforms like GitHub Enterprise or GitLab, such as advanced permissions management and extensive integrations.
  • Smaller Ecosystem
    Compared to larger platforms like GitHub, Gitea has a smaller ecosystem of plugins and integrations, which may limit certain functionalities.
  • Community Support
    While Gitea has an active community, it lacks the formal, professional support options available from larger commercial services, which might be a drawback for businesses seeking guaranteed support.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may experience a learning curve when transitioning to Gitea, especially if they are accustomed to other platforms with different workflows and interfaces.
  • Scalability Concerns
    For very large projects or organizations, Gitea may face scalability issues, as it is designed to be lightweight and may not handle extremely large loads as well as some competitors.
  • Update Management
    Users are responsible for managing Gitea updates and server maintenance when self-hosting, which requires additional administrative effort compared to cloud-hosted solutions.

GitHub Reader videos

No GitHub Reader videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Gitea videos

GITEA REVIEW ⭐ TUTORIAL 👨 RUN YOUR OWN GIT SERVER 💻 $50 FREEBIE 💰

More videos:

  • Review - Migrate to a Microsoft Github Alternative: Gitea
  • Review - Gitea - Git with a cup of tea - Installation and Configuration

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GitHub Reader and Gitea)
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Git
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GitHub Reader and Gitea. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GitHub Reader and Gitea

GitHub Reader Reviews

We have no reviews of GitHub Reader yet.
Be the first one to post

Gitea Reviews

The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives
Gitea is a painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service that includes Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry, and CI/CD. It is similar to GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab. Gitea was forked from Gogs originally and almost all the code has been changed.
Top 7 GitHub Alternatives You Should Know (2024)
Gitea is a lightweight, fast, and reliable DevOps platform providing development teams with essential version control and collaboration features. k
Source: snappify.com
Let's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Option
The Pull Request workflow is so dominant now that it’s considered the default path for code to permanently enter into a repository. You can see a similar features in GitHub’s smaller competition Codeberg, GitLab, BitBucket, and Gitea. These competitors don’t offer other, major code collaboration tools, and their Pull Request-like features aren’t just there to help users come...
Gitea - Alternative to GitLab and GitHub
There are still plenty of things you might want centralized on a server somewhere, but it seems like a lot of the value add of GitHub, GitLab, and now Gitea is in making git repos easier to manage and interact with.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Gitea seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 60 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GitHub Reader mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GitHub Reader yet. Tracking of GitHub Reader recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Gitea mentions (60)

  • Beware Offers of “Help” with Your Projects
    This reminds me of Gogs [0], where the original author refused a lot of good ideas and improvements, eventually leading to a fork [1] that's now a lot more popular and active than the original. [0] https://gogs.io/ [1] https://gitea.io/en-us/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Incident with Issues and Pull Requests
    Yes, we do this using https://gitea.io/en-us/ on a private server. Firewall, backups and a replica running for most projects. Github is only used when it's required by a stakeholder. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Let's Make Sure GitHub Doesn't Become the Only Option
    There's a number of places out there, some of which also support alternatives to Git itself. By no means a complete list and in no particular order: GitLab - https://about.gitlab.com/ Sourcehut - https://sourcehut.org/ Codeberg - https://codeberg.org/ Launchpad - https://launchpad.net/ Debian Salsa - https://salsa.debian.org/public Pagure - https://pagure.io/pagure For self hsoted options, there's these below... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • If you're on DSM 6 and still waiting for an update on the GitLab package, don't bother
    And if you need GitLab (for runner, etc...) then it's not too bad to run in Docker. But if anyone is looking for a somewhat simpler git solution, gitea is pretty great. Source: about 2 years ago
  • OpenBSD Upgrade 7.2 to 7.3
    Check: Configuration and syntax changes and Special packages. The latter includes changes on PostgreSQL, Python and Gitea. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GitHub Reader and Gitea, you can also consider the following products

Gitscout - A beautiful Github Issues experience for macOS

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Shrink for Github - A macOS app for your Github issues

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

VarCI - The missing assistant For GitHub issues

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.