Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GitHub Pages VS Underscore Templates

Compare GitHub Pages VS Underscore Templates and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

GitHub Pages logo GitHub Pages

A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

Underscore Templates logo Underscore Templates

Underscore.js template function for micro templating.
  • GitHub Pages Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-19
  • Underscore Templates Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-18

GitHub Pages features and specs

  • Free Hosting
    GitHub Pages provides free hosting for static websites, making it an economical choice given no cost is involved.
  • Easy Integration with GitHub
    Direct integration with GitHub repositories allows for seamless deployment directly from a repository’s branches.
  • Custom Domains
    Users can use their own custom domains, providing greater control over their site's branding and URL structure.
  • Jekyll Integration
    Built-in support for Jekyll, a popular static site generator, allows for easy creation and management of content.
  • Version Control
    Since your website's source code is hosted on GitHub, you can use Git version control to manage changes and collaborate with others.
  • SSL for Custom Domains
    Free SSL certificates provided for custom domains enhance security and improve SEO performance for your website.
  • GitHub Actions
    Integration with GitHub Actions allows for advanced CI/CD workflows, automating the process of testing and deploying updates.
  • Community and Documentation
    Extensive documentation and a large community make it easier to troubleshoot issues and find examples or guides.

Possible disadvantages of GitHub Pages

  • Static Site Limitations
    GitHub Pages only supports the hosting of static content, which means no support for server-side scripting or dynamic content.
  • Resource Limitations
    Imposed restrictions on bandwidth and storage may not be suitable for high-traffic or large-scale websites.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration, especially when dealing with custom domains or SSL, can be complex for beginners.
  • Limited Customization Options
    While Jekyll is powerful, there are still limitations in terms of plugins and customization compared to more robust CMS solutions.
  • No Backend Support
    Inability to run backend processes or databases means that dynamic applications requiring real-time data and complex backend logic cannot be hosted.
  • Corporate Restrictions
    Enterprises or organizations with strict security or compliance policies may find GitHub Pages insufficient for their needs.
  • Dependent on GitHub
    Reliance on GitHub's platform means that any downtime or outages on GitHub can directly affect the availability of your website.

Underscore Templates features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Underscore templates offer a simple and straightforward syntax for embedding JavaScript logic within HTML templates, making it easier for developers to create templates without a steep learning curve.
  • Server-Side and Client-Side Rendering
    These templates can be easily used for both client-side and server-side rendering, which provides flexibility in where and how logic and templates can be executed.
  • Lightweight
    Since Underscore.js is a utility library, it is relatively lightweight compared to larger frameworks, making template rendering faster for simple projects.
  • JavaScript Expressions
    Allows the use of any JavaScript expressions, providing the flexibility to include complex logic directly within the templates without additional processing.

Possible disadvantages of Underscore Templates

  • Limited Features
    Compared to full-fledged templating engines like Handlebars or Mustache, Underscore templates are limited in features, lacking built-in helpers and partials, which can make complex templating harder.
  • HTML Escaping
    By default, Underscore templates do not escape HTML, which requires developers to manually handle HTML escaping to prevent security vulnerabilities like XSS (Cross-Site Scripting).
  • Performance
    For very large templates or numerous updates, the performance might not be as efficient as specialized React/Vue components or virtual DOM implementations due to lack of optimizations.
  • Maintenance Difficulty
    Embedding logic directly within templates can lead to maintenance difficulties, as templates can become cluttered with JavaScript code, reducing the separation of concerns.

GitHub Pages videos

Intro to GitHub Pages

More videos:

  • Review - What is GitHub Pages?
  • Tutorial - How to Setup GitHub Pages (2020) | Data Science Portfolio

Underscore Templates videos

No Underscore Templates videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GitHub Pages and Underscore Templates)
Static Site Generators
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Localization
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GitHub Pages and Underscore Templates. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GitHub Pages and Underscore Templates

GitHub Pages Reviews

Exploring alternatives to Vercel: A guide for web developers
GitHub Pages is a free hosting service provided by GitHub, primarily intended for hosting static sites directly from a GitHub repository. While it lacks some of the advanced features found in other platforms, its simplicity and integration with GitHub make it an attractive option for certain types of projects.
Source: fleek.xyz
Top 10 Netlify Alternatives
Static Site Generators — It is a good way for developers to build sites on GitHub pages with the help of site generators. Yes, it has the ability to publish and release any static file. But it is recommended to proceed with Jekyll.

Underscore Templates Reviews

We have no reviews of Underscore Templates yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitHub Pages seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 495 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GitHub Pages mentions (495)

View more

Underscore Templates mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Underscore Templates yet. Tracking of Underscore Templates recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GitHub Pages and Underscore Templates, you can also consider the following products

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

Mustache.js - Minimal templating with {{mustaches}} in JavaScript - janl/mustache.js

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

Vash - Vash is a template engine that offers a swift flow between code and content using Razor Syntax

surge.sh - Static website hosting for front-end developers.

FLAVE - Flave was created to bring ASP.