Not too far ago, I invested several days into "mastering" and tuning TiddlyWiki. It was an interesting experience. I loved it on the whole and felt very enthusiastic about using it store all my knowledge. It's super flexible and use of tags, filters and macros make it unique. However, it's a bit complicated for mass adoption. Also, the extended use of its powerful features may make your computer tangibly slow.
That's why I found "Obsidian", that's what I'm using today to store my knowledge.
Based on our record, GitHub Pages should be more popular than TiddlyWiki. It has been mentiond 467 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
You can deploy to Github Pages in under 2 minutes by following their documentation. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
For this application, Elm controlled the routing. So, I had to adapt the scripts to deploy to Netlify instead of GitHub Pages. Why? Because you need to be able to tell the web server to redirect all relevant requests to the application. GitHub Pages doesn't have support for it. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
It's super easy to publish a static site like the resume with GitHub Pages. Just check out the docs. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
GitHub Pages: Host your static websites directly from your GitHub repository. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
If we forego human read-write-ability to gain some interactivity, we got https://tiddlywiki.com/ , a single long html file. - Source: Hacker News / about 21 hours ago
This reminds me of Perl's http://www.blosxom.com and also https://tiddlywiki.com. Self-contained sites with minimal requirements. - Source: Hacker News / 1 day ago
Tiddlywiki might be interesting. https://tiddlywiki.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
I use TiddlyWiki. It's a portable editable wiki that doesn't require a web server or web hosting. You open it from your computer, edit it, and save it. You get all of the linking that you'd expect to see in a wiki, and it's super readable and easy to use. Source: 6 months ago
Hopefully, this will make it much easier for software like tiddlywiki [1] where the idea is to be as self-contained as possible. It has depended on various mechanisms to save changes to disk, but this may lower the threshold to use it and feel more streamlined [1] https://tiddlywiki.com. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.
Obsidian.md - A second brain, for you, forever. Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
DokuWiki - DokuWiki is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database.
Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket
Zim Wiki - Zim is a graphical text editor used to maintain a collection of wiki pages. Each page can contain links to other pages, simple formatting and images.