Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GitHub Pages VS intercooler.js

Compare GitHub Pages VS intercooler.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

GitHub Pages logo GitHub Pages

A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

intercooler.js logo intercooler.js

Simple, declarative AJAX using HTML attributes
  • GitHub Pages Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-19
  • intercooler.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

GitHub Pages features and specs

  • Free Hosting
    GitHub Pages provides free hosting for static websites, making it an economical choice given no cost is involved.
  • Easy Integration with GitHub
    Direct integration with GitHub repositories allows for seamless deployment directly from a repository’s branches.
  • Custom Domains
    Users can use their own custom domains, providing greater control over their site's branding and URL structure.
  • Jekyll Integration
    Built-in support for Jekyll, a popular static site generator, allows for easy creation and management of content.
  • Version Control
    Since your website's source code is hosted on GitHub, you can use Git version control to manage changes and collaborate with others.
  • SSL for Custom Domains
    Free SSL certificates provided for custom domains enhance security and improve SEO performance for your website.
  • GitHub Actions
    Integration with GitHub Actions allows for advanced CI/CD workflows, automating the process of testing and deploying updates.
  • Community and Documentation
    Extensive documentation and a large community make it easier to troubleshoot issues and find examples or guides.

Possible disadvantages of GitHub Pages

  • Static Site Limitations
    GitHub Pages only supports the hosting of static content, which means no support for server-side scripting or dynamic content.
  • Resource Limitations
    Imposed restrictions on bandwidth and storage may not be suitable for high-traffic or large-scale websites.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration, especially when dealing with custom domains or SSL, can be complex for beginners.
  • Limited Customization Options
    While Jekyll is powerful, there are still limitations in terms of plugins and customization compared to more robust CMS solutions.
  • No Backend Support
    Inability to run backend processes or databases means that dynamic applications requiring real-time data and complex backend logic cannot be hosted.
  • Corporate Restrictions
    Enterprises or organizations with strict security or compliance policies may find GitHub Pages insufficient for their needs.
  • Dependent on GitHub
    Reliance on GitHub's platform means that any downtime or outages on GitHub can directly affect the availability of your website.

intercooler.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

GitHub Pages videos

Intro to GitHub Pages

More videos:

  • Review - What is GitHub Pages?
  • Tutorial - How to Setup GitHub Pages (2020) | Data Science Portfolio

intercooler.js videos

Carson Gross - Intercooler.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GitHub Pages and intercooler.js)
Static Site Generators
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
JS Library
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GitHub Pages and intercooler.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GitHub Pages and intercooler.js

GitHub Pages Reviews

Exploring alternatives to Vercel: A guide for web developers
GitHub Pages is a free hosting service provided by GitHub, primarily intended for hosting static sites directly from a GitHub repository. While it lacks some of the advanced features found in other platforms, its simplicity and integration with GitHub make it an attractive option for certain types of projects.
Source: fleek.xyz
Top 10 Netlify Alternatives
Static Site Generators — It is a good way for developers to build sites on GitHub pages with the help of site generators. Yes, it has the ability to publish and release any static file. But it is recommended to proceed with Jekyll.

intercooler.js Reviews

We have no reviews of intercooler.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitHub Pages seems to be a lot more popular than intercooler.js. While we know about 492 links to GitHub Pages, we've tracked only 9 mentions of intercooler.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GitHub Pages mentions (492)

View more

intercooler.js mentions (9)

  • How do you do, fellow web developers? A growing disconnect
    Regardless of what CSS query you use to look the element up, in the jquery example you'd still have your logic (the url, etc) defined elsewhere the htmx version is symmetric with the href attribute in that it completely specifies what is going to happen directly on the element itself of course you could do something in jquery like using a data attribute to store the url and HTTP method, etc, but at that point... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Htmx and the Rule of Least Power
    An early version of Htmx was in fact based on jQuery (https://intercoolerjs.org). - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Rage: Fast web framework compatible with Rails
    I used HTMX since the intercooler days [0] but the stuff you can make is rather limited. Also you still need the JS to deal with a11y things like expanded state (or hyperscript, apparently). If you have a lot of components to implement, everything requires thinking. I really love it for simple applications though. Resist implementing a complicated menu, live notifications, an editable data-table and such... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Htmx is part of the GitHub Accelerator
    To an extent, there was `jQuery.get` but it wasn't tightly integrated with HTML the original version of htmx was intercooler.js: https://intercoolerjs.org released in 2013, and that version depended on jQuery. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Htmx is part of the GitHub Accelerator
    :) hyperscript came after htmx htmx is version 2 of intercoolerjs: https://intercoolerjs.org which had a proto-scripting language in it, the `ic-action` attribute: https://intercoolerjs.org/attributes/ic-action I dropped that attribute (along w/ the jQuery dependency) when I created htmx, but I felt there was some merit to the idea of a lightweight scripting language that abstracted away async behavior. Once htmx... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GitHub Pages and intercooler.js, you can also consider the following products

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

surge.sh - Static website hosting for front-end developers.

BULLETWEEK.app - BULLETWEEK - the GTD app inspired by the Bullet Journal